Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?

Brown, Lloyd

doi:10.1093/tandt/ttaa083

Journal article 1224 views

Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?

Lloyd Brown

Trusts & Trustees, Volume: 26, Issue: 8-9, Pages: 756 - 766

Swansea University Author: Lloyd Brown

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1093/tandt/ttaa083

Published in:	Trusts & Trustees
ISSN:	1363-1780 1752-2110
Published:	Oxford University Press (OUP) 2020
Online Access:	Check full text
URI:	https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa57970

first_indexed	2021-09-20T10:08:33Z
last_indexed	2023-01-11T14:38:14Z
id	cronfa57970
recordtype	SURis
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2023-01-03T16:41:02.2559214</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>57970</id><entry>2021-09-20</entry><title>Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>786add39c141818cbb959ce7277bbd69</sid><firstname>Lloyd</firstname><surname>Brown</surname><name>Lloyd Brown</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-09-20</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract/><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Trusts & Trustees</journal><volume>26</volume><journalNumber>8-9</journalNumber><paginationStart>756</paginationStart><paginationEnd>766</paginationEnd><publisher>Oxford University Press (OUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1363-1780</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1752-2110</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-11-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1093/tandt/ttaa083</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2023-01-03T16:41:02.2559214</lastEdited><Created>2021-09-20T10:56:52.9446870</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Lloyd</firstname><surname>Brown</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling	2023-01-03T16:41:02.2559214 v2 57970 2021-09-20 Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes? 786add39c141818cbb959ce7277bbd69 Lloyd Brown Lloyd Brown true false 2021-09-20 HRCL Journal Article Trusts & Trustees 26 8-9 756 766 Oxford University Press (OUP) 1363-1780 1752-2110 1 11 2020 2020-11-01 10.1093/tandt/ttaa083 COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University 2023-01-03T16:41:02.2559214 2021-09-20T10:56:52.9446870 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Lloyd Brown 1
title	Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?
spellingShingle	Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes? Lloyd Brown
title_short	Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?
title_full	Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?
title_fullStr	Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?
title_full_unstemmed	Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?
title_sort	Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?
author_id_str_mv	786add39c141818cbb959ce7277bbd69
author_id_fullname_str_mv	786add39c141818cbb959ce7277bbd69_***_Lloyd Brown
author	Lloyd Brown
author2	Lloyd Brown
format	Journal article
container_title	Trusts & Trustees
container_volume	26
container_issue	8-9
container_start_page	756
publishDate	2020
institution	Swansea University
issn	1363-1780 1752-2110
doi_str_mv	10.1093/tandt/ttaa083
publisher	Oxford University Press (OUP)
college_str	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id	facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str	Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
document_store_str	0
active_str	0
published_date	2020-11-01T14:13:23Z
_version_	1821415103341264896
score	11.247077

Cowan v Scargill and the fiduciary duty of investment: has the nature of the investment duty changed and what is currently driving “socially responsible investing” in pension schemes?

Similar Items