No Cover Image

Journal article 840 views 207 downloads

Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance

Andrew Tettenborn Orcid Logo

Law Quarterly Review, Volume: 138, Pages: 101 - 113

Swansea University Author: Andrew Tettenborn Orcid Logo

Abstract

The thesis that the validity of a consensual equitable security over personalty depends on the availability of specific performance to the secured party is heretical and unsound.

Published in: Law Quarterly Review
ISSN: 0023-933X
Published: London Sweet and Maxwell 2022
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa57249
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2021-06-30T16:53:23Z
last_indexed 2022-01-07T04:23:36Z
id cronfa57249
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-01-06T16:18:38.9153695</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>57249</id><entry>2021-06-30</entry><title>Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-8025-5630</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Tettenborn</surname><name>Andrew Tettenborn</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-06-30</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>The thesis that the validity of a consensual equitable security over personalty depends on the availability of specific performance to the secured party is heretical and unsound.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Law Quarterly Review</journal><volume>138</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>101</paginationStart><paginationEnd>113</paginationEnd><publisher>Sweet and Maxwell</publisher><placeOfPublication>London</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0023-933X</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Equitable charges; Legal history; Personal property; Specific performance</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-01-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2022-01-06T16:18:38.9153695</lastEdited><Created>2021-06-30T17:49:25.7898846</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Tettenborn</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8025-5630</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>57249__22018__df773b7197804d38babf0d5aa9cbdedb.pdf</filename><originalFilename>57249 (2).pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-01-05T12:08:53.2301464</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>92411</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Released under the terms of a CC BY-NC license</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-01-06T16:18:38.9153695 v2 57249 2021-06-30 Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2 0000-0002-8025-5630 Andrew Tettenborn Andrew Tettenborn true false 2021-06-30 LAWD The thesis that the validity of a consensual equitable security over personalty depends on the availability of specific performance to the secured party is heretical and unsound. Journal Article Law Quarterly Review 138 101 113 Sweet and Maxwell London 0023-933X Equitable charges; Legal history; Personal property; Specific performance 1 1 2022 2022-01-01 COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2022-01-06T16:18:38.9153695 2021-06-30T17:49:25.7898846 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Andrew Tettenborn 0000-0002-8025-5630 1 57249__22018__df773b7197804d38babf0d5aa9cbdedb.pdf 57249 (2).pdf 2022-01-05T12:08:53.2301464 Output 92411 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true Released under the terms of a CC BY-NC license true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance
spellingShingle Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance
Andrew Tettenborn
title_short Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance
title_full Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance
title_fullStr Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance
title_full_unstemmed Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance
title_sort Security over personalty: property, obligation and specific performance
author_id_str_mv 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2
author_id_fullname_str_mv 32453c4882e72f12ae003e34742302d2_***_Andrew Tettenborn
author Andrew Tettenborn
author2 Andrew Tettenborn
format Journal article
container_title Law Quarterly Review
container_volume 138
container_start_page 101
publishDate 2022
institution Swansea University
issn 0023-933X
publisher Sweet and Maxwell
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description The thesis that the validity of a consensual equitable security over personalty depends on the availability of specific performance to the secured party is heretical and unsound.
published_date 2022-01-01T04:12:50Z
_version_ 1763753874638766080
score 11.013731