Journal article 918 views 126 downloads
Consensus of travel direction is achieved by simple copying, not voting, in free-ranging goats
Royal Society Open Science, Volume: 8, Issue: 2, Start page: 201128
Swansea University Authors: Ines Fuertbauer , Andrew King
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2021 The Authors. Released under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Download (917.67KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1098/rsos.201128
Abstract
For group-living animals to remain cohesive they must agree on where to travel. Theoretical models predict shared group decisions should be favoured, and a number of empirical examples support this. However, the behavioural mechanisms that underpin shared decision-making are not fully understood. Gr...
Published in: | Royal Society Open Science |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2054-5703 |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa56075 |
Abstract: |
For group-living animals to remain cohesive they must agree on where to travel. Theoretical models predict shared group decisions should be favoured, and a number of empirical examples support this. However, the behavioural mechanisms that underpin shared decision-making are not fully understood. Groups may achieve consensus of direction by active communication of individual preferences (i.e. voting), or by responding to each other's orientation and movement (i.e. copying). For example, African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) are reported to use body orientation to vote and indicate their preferred direction to achieve a consensus on travel direction, while golden shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas) achieve consensus of direction by responding to the movement cues of their neighbours. Here, we present a conceptual model (supported by agent-based simulations) that allows us to distinguish patterns of motion that represent voting or copying. We test our model predictions using high-resolution GPS and magnetometer data collected from a herd of free-ranging goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) in the Namib Desert, Namibia. We find that decisions concerning travel direction were more consistent with individuals copying one another's motion and find no evidence to support the use of voting with body orientation. Our findings highlight the role of simple behavioural rules for collective decision-making by animal groups. |
---|---|
Keywords: |
coordination, decision-making, heuristics, rules-ofthumb, self-organization, collective behaviour |
College: |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
Funders: |
UKRI, NE/M015351/1 |
Issue: |
2 |
Start Page: |
201128 |