No Cover Image

Journal article 626 views 97 downloads

Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment

Abbie Jayne Parton, Mark Waldron Orcid Logo, Tom Clifford, Owen Jeffries

Physiology & Behavior, Volume: 229, Start page: 113250

Swansea University Author: Mark Waldron Orcid Logo

  • 55692.pdf

    PDF | Accepted Manuscript

    © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Download (833.56KB)

Abstract

AimsThis study investigated the efficacy of L-menthol mouth-rinsing on thermal sensation and perceived effort in females and males, using a fixed-rating of perceived exertion (RPE) exercise protocol in a hot environment.MethodsTwenty-two participants (eleven females, eleven males) completed two tria...

Full description

Published in: Physiology & Behavior
ISSN: 0031-9384
Published: Elsevier BV 2021
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa55692
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2020-11-18T16:40:42Z
last_indexed 2021-01-13T04:20:19Z
id cronfa55692
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-01-12T11:49:16.6688212</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>55692</id><entry>2020-11-18</entry><title>Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2720-4615</ORCID><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Waldron</surname><name>Mark Waldron</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-11-18</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>AimsThis study investigated the efficacy of L-menthol mouth-rinsing on thermal sensation and perceived effort in females and males, using a fixed-rating of perceived exertion (RPE) exercise protocol in a hot environment.MethodsTwenty-two participants (eleven females, eleven males) completed two trials using a fixed-RPE protocol at an exercise intensity between &#x2018;hard&#x2019; and &#x2018;very hard&#x2019;, equating to 16 on the RPE scale at &#x223C;35&#xB0;C. Participants adjusted power output to maintain RPE-16. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, L-menthol or a control mouthwash was administered at an orally neutral temperature (&#x223C;32 &#xB0;C) prior to exercise and at 10 min intervals thereafter. Measures of mechanical power output, core temperature, heart rate, perception of thermal sensation and thermal comfort, and whole-body sweat loss are reported.ResultsThermal sensation was lowered by L-menthol in both sexes (P &lt; 0.05), however during exercise this was only maintained for 40% of the trial duration in females. Thermal comfort did not differ between conditions (P &gt; 0.05). No differences in exercise duration were observed compared to control, despite a &#x223C;4 % and &#x223C;6 % increase in male and females respectively. Power output increased by &#x223C;6.5 % males (P&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.039) with no difference in females &#x223C;2.2% (P&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.475), compared to control. Core temperature, heart rate and whole-body sweat loss was not different between condition or sex.ConclusionsL-menthol lowered perceptual measures of thermal sensation in females, but did not attenuate a greater rate of rise in thermal sensitivity when exercising in a hot environment, compared to males. Males appeared to adopt a higher risk strategy by increasing power output following L-menthol administration in contrast to a more conservative pacing strategy in females. Therefore, there appear to be sex-specific differences in L-menthol's non-thermal cooling properties and subsequent effects on thermo-behavioural adjustments in work-load when exercising in a hot environment.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Physiology &amp; Behavior</journal><volume>229</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>113250</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0031-9384</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Thermoregulation, Perception, Menthol, Heat, Female, Gender</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-02-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113250</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-01-12T11:49:16.6688212</lastEdited><Created>2020-11-18T16:38:25.1116326</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Abbie Jayne</firstname><surname>Parton</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Waldron</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2720-4615</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Tom</firstname><surname>Clifford</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Owen</firstname><surname>Jeffries</surname><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>55692__18692__c11c013af190418f8904cb38a55198b9.pdf</filename><originalFilename>55692.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-11-18T16:40:29.2964014</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>853568</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2021-11-18T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>&#xA9; 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2021-01-12T11:49:16.6688212 v2 55692 2020-11-18 Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment 70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa 0000-0002-2720-4615 Mark Waldron Mark Waldron true false 2020-11-18 STSC AimsThis study investigated the efficacy of L-menthol mouth-rinsing on thermal sensation and perceived effort in females and males, using a fixed-rating of perceived exertion (RPE) exercise protocol in a hot environment.MethodsTwenty-two participants (eleven females, eleven males) completed two trials using a fixed-RPE protocol at an exercise intensity between ‘hard’ and ‘very hard’, equating to 16 on the RPE scale at ∼35°C. Participants adjusted power output to maintain RPE-16. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, L-menthol or a control mouthwash was administered at an orally neutral temperature (∼32 °C) prior to exercise and at 10 min intervals thereafter. Measures of mechanical power output, core temperature, heart rate, perception of thermal sensation and thermal comfort, and whole-body sweat loss are reported.ResultsThermal sensation was lowered by L-menthol in both sexes (P < 0.05), however during exercise this was only maintained for 40% of the trial duration in females. Thermal comfort did not differ between conditions (P > 0.05). No differences in exercise duration were observed compared to control, despite a ∼4 % and ∼6 % increase in male and females respectively. Power output increased by ∼6.5 % males (P = 0.039) with no difference in females ∼2.2% (P = 0.475), compared to control. Core temperature, heart rate and whole-body sweat loss was not different between condition or sex.ConclusionsL-menthol lowered perceptual measures of thermal sensation in females, but did not attenuate a greater rate of rise in thermal sensitivity when exercising in a hot environment, compared to males. Males appeared to adopt a higher risk strategy by increasing power output following L-menthol administration in contrast to a more conservative pacing strategy in females. Therefore, there appear to be sex-specific differences in L-menthol's non-thermal cooling properties and subsequent effects on thermo-behavioural adjustments in work-load when exercising in a hot environment. Journal Article Physiology & Behavior 229 113250 Elsevier BV 0031-9384 Thermoregulation, Perception, Menthol, Heat, Female, Gender 1 2 2021 2021-02-01 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113250 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2021-01-12T11:49:16.6688212 2020-11-18T16:38:25.1116326 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Abbie Jayne Parton 1 Mark Waldron 0000-0002-2720-4615 2 Tom Clifford 3 Owen Jeffries 4 55692__18692__c11c013af190418f8904cb38a55198b9.pdf 55692.pdf 2020-11-18T16:40:29.2964014 Output 853568 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2021-11-18T00:00:00.0000000 © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment
spellingShingle Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment
Mark Waldron
title_short Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment
title_full Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment
title_fullStr Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment
title_full_unstemmed Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment
title_sort Thermo-behavioural responses to orally applied l-menthol exhibit sex-specific differences during exercise in a hot environment
author_id_str_mv 70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa
author_id_fullname_str_mv 70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa_***_Mark Waldron
author Mark Waldron
author2 Abbie Jayne Parton
Mark Waldron
Tom Clifford
Owen Jeffries
format Journal article
container_title Physiology & Behavior
container_volume 229
container_start_page 113250
publishDate 2021
institution Swansea University
issn 0031-9384
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113250
publisher Elsevier BV
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description AimsThis study investigated the efficacy of L-menthol mouth-rinsing on thermal sensation and perceived effort in females and males, using a fixed-rating of perceived exertion (RPE) exercise protocol in a hot environment.MethodsTwenty-two participants (eleven females, eleven males) completed two trials using a fixed-RPE protocol at an exercise intensity between ‘hard’ and ‘very hard’, equating to 16 on the RPE scale at ∼35°C. Participants adjusted power output to maintain RPE-16. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, L-menthol or a control mouthwash was administered at an orally neutral temperature (∼32 °C) prior to exercise and at 10 min intervals thereafter. Measures of mechanical power output, core temperature, heart rate, perception of thermal sensation and thermal comfort, and whole-body sweat loss are reported.ResultsThermal sensation was lowered by L-menthol in both sexes (P < 0.05), however during exercise this was only maintained for 40% of the trial duration in females. Thermal comfort did not differ between conditions (P > 0.05). No differences in exercise duration were observed compared to control, despite a ∼4 % and ∼6 % increase in male and females respectively. Power output increased by ∼6.5 % males (P = 0.039) with no difference in females ∼2.2% (P = 0.475), compared to control. Core temperature, heart rate and whole-body sweat loss was not different between condition or sex.ConclusionsL-menthol lowered perceptual measures of thermal sensation in females, but did not attenuate a greater rate of rise in thermal sensitivity when exercising in a hot environment, compared to males. Males appeared to adopt a higher risk strategy by increasing power output following L-menthol administration in contrast to a more conservative pacing strategy in females. Therefore, there appear to be sex-specific differences in L-menthol's non-thermal cooling properties and subsequent effects on thermo-behavioural adjustments in work-load when exercising in a hot environment.
published_date 2021-02-01T04:10:06Z
_version_ 1763753702627213312
score 11.01306