Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:

Jones, Kerina; Heys, Sharon; Thompson, Rachel; Jones, Kerina; Griffiths, Lucy; Johnson, Rhodri; Lee, Alexandra; Ford, David; Broadhurst, Karen

doi:10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1370

Journal article 935 views 130 downloads

Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:

Kerina Jones

, Sharon Heys, Rachel Thompson, Kerina Jones, Lucy Griffiths

, Rhodri Johnson, Alexandra Lee, David Ford

, Karen Broadhurst

International Journal of Population Data Science, Volume: 5, Issue: 3

Swansea University Authors: Kerina Jones , Sharon Heys, Rachel Thompson, Lucy Griffiths , Rhodri Johnson, Alexandra Lee, David Ford

PDF | Version of Record

Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) License.
Download (333.23KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1370

Abstract

Introduction: The long-term health and wellbeing of adoptees is under-researched. One reason for this has been limited data accessibility regarding the adoption process, and another is a practice common in some UK jurisdictions of changing the NHS number (or equivalent) at adoption, as part of creat...

Full description

Published in:	International Journal of Population Data Science
ISSN:	2399-4908
Published:	Swansea University 2020
Online Access:	Check full text
URI:	https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa55516
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

first_indexed	2020-10-26T16:24:47Z
last_indexed	2021-09-30T03:18:00Z
id	cronfa55516
recordtype	SURis
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-09-29T12:01:39.8529222</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>55516</id><entry>2020-10-26</entry><title>Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c13b3cd0a6f8cbac2e461b54b3cdd839</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8164-3718</ORCID><firstname>Kerina</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><name>Kerina Jones</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>61f095d8f6942db1b4fd65e2053091f5</sid><firstname>Sharon</firstname><surname>Heys</surname><name>Sharon Heys</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>5d2bdee781fad5d610c2d0d19a724c40</sid><firstname>Rachel</firstname><surname>Thompson</surname><name>Rachel Thompson</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>e35ea6ea4b429e812ef204b048131d93</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-9230-624X</ORCID><firstname>Lucy</firstname><surname>Griffiths</surname><name>Lucy Griffiths</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>5f97fd65ef8cf66db750f645f115454c</sid><ORCID/><firstname>Rhodri</firstname><surname>Johnson</surname><name>Rhodri Johnson</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>7c6dc217555b0fea264ff0dd7d0aa374</sid><firstname>Alexandra</firstname><surname>Lee</surname><name>Alexandra Lee</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>52fc0c473b0da1b7218d87f9fc68a3e6</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6551-721X</ORCID><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Ford</surname><name>David Ford</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-10-26</date><deptcode>HDAT</deptcode><abstract>Introduction: The long-term health and wellbeing of adoptees is under-researched. One reason for this has been limited data accessibility regarding the adoption process, and another is a practice common in some UK jurisdictions of changing the NHS number (or equivalent) at adoption, as part of creating the new identity. The SAIL Databank holds data from the Wales Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass Cymru), together with children’s social care data, and can link these with routine health and administrative data in anonymised form. However, because the linkage key at SAIL is based on an encryption of the NHS number, working with pre- and post-adoption records for longitudinal research remains a major challenge. We set out to explore the legal implications of, and social support for, linking these records for use in anonymised form for longitudinal research. Methods: We reviewed the main legislation and regulations governing the use of data about adoptees in England and Wales. We gauged support for a social licence in Wales by carrying out interviews with individuals who had been involved in the adoptions process, and by engaging with general public groups for their views. We drew out the main emerging themes and, in combination with the review, propose a way forward. Results: The legal review indicated that there are provisions in the Family Procedure Rules (England and Wales) and the General Data Protection Regulation that can be relied upon for the lawful processing of adoption data into anonymised form for research. The main points of concern about linking pre- and post-adoption records were privacy, data security, the need to limit the number of organisations involved in data sharing, and re-identification risk. The over-riding message was favourable with longitudinal research seen as strongly beneficial. Conclusion: This study has indicated that in Wales, there is no legal impediment, nor major objection from individuals involved in the adoptions process, as well as the general public for the use of adoption data in anonymised form, in a data safe haven. This includes the linkage of pre- and post‑adoption records to enable novel longitudinal research to take place. The provisos were that robust safeguards must be in place, and that the research should aim to benefit adoptees and to improve policy and practice. We conclude that it is reasonable to proceed with caution to develop practical ways to link pre- and post‑adoption records in a data safe haven.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>International Journal of Population Data Science</journal><volume>5</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Swansea University</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2399-4908</issnElectronic><keywords>Public engagement, legal issues, adoptions data</keywords><publishedDay>23</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-10-23</publishedDate><doi>10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1370</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Health Data Science</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HDAT</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>UKRI, ESRC ES/S007393/1</funders><lastEdited>2021-09-29T12:01:39.8529222</lastEdited><Created>2020-10-26T16:17:48.6817852</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">Swansea University Medical School - Medicine</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Kerina</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8164-3718</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Sharon</firstname><surname>Heys</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Rachel</firstname><surname>Thompson</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Kerina</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Lucy</firstname><surname>Griffiths</surname><orcid>0000-0001-9230-624X</orcid><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Rhodri</firstname><surname>Johnson</surname><orcid/><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Alexandra</firstname><surname>Lee</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Ford</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6551-721X</orcid><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Karen</firstname><surname>Broadhurst</surname><order>9</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>55516__18498__9214ef0f6db9472aa2d78446cc78d16f.pdf</filename><originalFilename>55516.VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-10-26T16:23:24.8143249</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>341225</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling	2021-09-29T12:01:39.8529222 v2 55516 2020-10-26 Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven: c13b3cd0a6f8cbac2e461b54b3cdd839 0000-0001-8164-3718 Kerina Jones Kerina Jones true false 61f095d8f6942db1b4fd65e2053091f5 Sharon Heys Sharon Heys true false 5d2bdee781fad5d610c2d0d19a724c40 Rachel Thompson Rachel Thompson true false e35ea6ea4b429e812ef204b048131d93 0000-0001-9230-624X Lucy Griffiths Lucy Griffiths true false 5f97fd65ef8cf66db750f645f115454c Rhodri Johnson Rhodri Johnson true false 7c6dc217555b0fea264ff0dd7d0aa374 Alexandra Lee Alexandra Lee true false 52fc0c473b0da1b7218d87f9fc68a3e6 0000-0001-6551-721X David Ford David Ford true false 2020-10-26 HDAT Introduction: The long-term health and wellbeing of adoptees is under-researched. One reason for this has been limited data accessibility regarding the adoption process, and another is a practice common in some UK jurisdictions of changing the NHS number (or equivalent) at adoption, as part of creating the new identity. The SAIL Databank holds data from the Wales Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass Cymru), together with children’s social care data, and can link these with routine health and administrative data in anonymised form. However, because the linkage key at SAIL is based on an encryption of the NHS number, working with pre- and post-adoption records for longitudinal research remains a major challenge. We set out to explore the legal implications of, and social support for, linking these records for use in anonymised form for longitudinal research. Methods: We reviewed the main legislation and regulations governing the use of data about adoptees in England and Wales. We gauged support for a social licence in Wales by carrying out interviews with individuals who had been involved in the adoptions process, and by engaging with general public groups for their views. We drew out the main emerging themes and, in combination with the review, propose a way forward. Results: The legal review indicated that there are provisions in the Family Procedure Rules (England and Wales) and the General Data Protection Regulation that can be relied upon for the lawful processing of adoption data into anonymised form for research. The main points of concern about linking pre- and post-adoption records were privacy, data security, the need to limit the number of organisations involved in data sharing, and re-identification risk. The over-riding message was favourable with longitudinal research seen as strongly beneficial. Conclusion: This study has indicated that in Wales, there is no legal impediment, nor major objection from individuals involved in the adoptions process, as well as the general public for the use of adoption data in anonymised form, in a data safe haven. This includes the linkage of pre- and post‑adoption records to enable novel longitudinal research to take place. The provisos were that robust safeguards must be in place, and that the research should aim to benefit adoptees and to improve policy and practice. We conclude that it is reasonable to proceed with caution to develop practical ways to link pre- and post‑adoption records in a data safe haven. Journal Article International Journal of Population Data Science 5 3 Swansea University 2399-4908 Public engagement, legal issues, adoptions data 23 10 2020 2020-10-23 10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1370 COLLEGE NANME Health Data Science COLLEGE CODE HDAT Swansea University UKRI, ESRC ES/S007393/1 2021-09-29T12:01:39.8529222 2020-10-26T16:17:48.6817852 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Swansea University Medical School - Medicine Kerina Jones 0000-0001-8164-3718 1 Sharon Heys 2 Rachel Thompson 3 Kerina Jones 4 Lucy Griffiths 0000-0001-9230-624X 5 Rhodri Johnson 6 Alexandra Lee 7 David Ford 0000-0001-6551-721X 8 Karen Broadhurst 9 55516__18498__9214ef0f6db9472aa2d78446cc78d16f.pdf 55516.VOR.pdf 2020-10-26T16:23:24.8143249 Output 341225 application/pdf Version of Record true Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) License. true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
title	Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:
spellingShingle	Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven: Kerina Jones Sharon Heys Rachel Thompson Lucy Griffiths Rhodri Johnson Alexandra Lee David Ford
title_short	Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:
title_full	Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:
title_fullStr	Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:
title_full_unstemmed	Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:
title_sort	Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:
author_id_str_mv	c13b3cd0a6f8cbac2e461b54b3cdd839 61f095d8f6942db1b4fd65e2053091f5 5d2bdee781fad5d610c2d0d19a724c40 e35ea6ea4b429e812ef204b048131d93 5f97fd65ef8cf66db750f645f115454c 7c6dc217555b0fea264ff0dd7d0aa374 52fc0c473b0da1b7218d87f9fc68a3e6
author_id_fullname_str_mv	c13b3cd0a6f8cbac2e461b54b3cdd839_*_Kerina Jones 61f095d8f6942db1b4fd65e2053091f5__Sharon Heys 5d2bdee781fad5d610c2d0d19a724c40__Rachel Thompson e35ea6ea4b429e812ef204b048131d93__Lucy Griffiths 5f97fd65ef8cf66db750f645f115454c__Rhodri Johnson 7c6dc217555b0fea264ff0dd7d0aa374__Alexandra Lee 52fc0c473b0da1b7218d87f9fc68a3e6_**_David Ford
author	Kerina Jones Sharon Heys Rachel Thompson Lucy Griffiths Rhodri Johnson Alexandra Lee David Ford
author2	Kerina Jones Sharon Heys Rachel Thompson Kerina Jones Lucy Griffiths Rhodri Johnson Alexandra Lee David Ford Karen Broadhurst
format	Journal article
container_title	International Journal of Population Data Science
container_volume	5
container_issue	3
publishDate	2020
institution	Swansea University
issn	2399-4908
doi_str_mv	10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1370
publisher	Swansea University
college_str	Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id	facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title	Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title	Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str	Swansea University Medical School - Medicine{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Swansea University Medical School - Medicine
document_store_str	1
active_str	0
description	Introduction: The long-term health and wellbeing of adoptees is under-researched. One reason for this has been limited data accessibility regarding the adoption process, and another is a practice common in some UK jurisdictions of changing the NHS number (or equivalent) at adoption, as part of creating the new identity. The SAIL Databank holds data from the Wales Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass Cymru), together with children’s social care data, and can link these with routine health and administrative data in anonymised form. However, because the linkage key at SAIL is based on an encryption of the NHS number, working with pre- and post-adoption records for longitudinal research remains a major challenge. We set out to explore the legal implications of, and social support for, linking these records for use in anonymised form for longitudinal research. Methods: We reviewed the main legislation and regulations governing the use of data about adoptees in England and Wales. We gauged support for a social licence in Wales by carrying out interviews with individuals who had been involved in the adoptions process, and by engaging with general public groups for their views. We drew out the main emerging themes and, in combination with the review, propose a way forward. Results: The legal review indicated that there are provisions in the Family Procedure Rules (England and Wales) and the General Data Protection Regulation that can be relied upon for the lawful processing of adoption data into anonymised form for research. The main points of concern about linking pre- and post-adoption records were privacy, data security, the need to limit the number of organisations involved in data sharing, and re-identification risk. The over-riding message was favourable with longitudinal research seen as strongly beneficial. Conclusion: This study has indicated that in Wales, there is no legal impediment, nor major objection from individuals involved in the adoptions process, as well as the general public for the use of adoption data in anonymised form, in a data safe haven. This includes the linkage of pre- and post‑adoption records to enable novel longitudinal research to take place. The provisos were that robust safeguards must be in place, and that the research should aim to benefit adoptees and to improve policy and practice. We conclude that it is reasonable to proceed with caution to develop practical ways to link pre- and post‑adoption records in a data safe haven.
published_date	2020-10-23T04:09:47Z
_version_	1763753682294276096
score	11.037581

Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven:

Similar Items