No Cover Image

Journal article 933 views

Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper

V Randle, G.S Rohrer, H.M Miller, M Coleman, G.T Owen, Valerie Randle, Mark Coleman Orcid Logo

Acta Materialia, Volume: 56, Issue: 10, Pages: 2363 - 2373

Swansea University Authors: Valerie Randle, Mark Coleman Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.039

Abstract

The five-parameter grain boundary distributions of grain boundary engineered nickel and copper specimens have been analyzed in detail. The relative areas of {1 1 1} planes in the entire population did not increase as a result of grain boundary engineering (GBE) and, in the Σ3-excluded population, de...

Full description

Published in: Acta Materialia
ISSN: 1359-6454
Published: 2008
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa5522
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T11:52:53Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:31:53Z
id cronfa5522
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2016-08-17T14:01:32.6812665</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>5522</id><entry>2013-09-03</entry><title>Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>50774edc7f60dff63ee0cbd56be764b8</sid><firstname>Valerie</firstname><surname>Randle</surname><name>Valerie Randle</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>73c5735de19c8a70acb41ab788081b67</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-4628-1077</ORCID><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Coleman</surname><name>Mark Coleman</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2013-09-03</date><deptcode>FGSEN</deptcode><abstract>The five-parameter grain boundary distributions of grain boundary engineered nickel and copper specimens have been analyzed in detail. The relative areas of {1 1 1} planes in the entire population did not increase as a result of grain boundary engineering (GBE) and, in the &#x3A3;3-excluded population, decreased after GBE. This decrease occurred because the majority of the newly generated &#x3A3;3 grain boundaries were not coherent twins with {1 1 1} grain boundary plane orientations. GBE increased the proportion of &#x3A3;3 boundary length that was vicinal-to-{1 1 1} and the proportion of asymmetrical &#x3008;1 1 0&#x3009; tilt boundaries. There was a clear propensity for selection of particular planes or plane combinations which were associated with low energy. These plane types were analyzed in some detail, and it was shown that many of these boundaries were asymmetrical tilts comprising (or vicinal to) at least one low-index plane.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Acta Materialia</journal><volume>56</volume><journalNumber>10</journalNumber><paginationStart>2363</paginationStart><paginationEnd>2373</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>1359-6454</issnPrint><keywords>Grain boundary; Grain boundary twin; Electron backscatter diffraction; Grain boundary plane</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2008</publishedYear><publishedDate>2008-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.039</doi><url/><notes>This work, which was part funded by EPSRC grant EP/C51260X, represents part of an ongoing international collaboration with Professor Rohrer at Carnegie Mellon University, USA. The work, which was published in an IF 3.76 journal and has 35 citations so far, makes a significant contribution to understanding the microstructure of grain boundary engineered material in commercially available products. This was achieved by the novel &#x2018;five-parameter&#x2019; methodology. It has led to a new EPSRC research grant, &#x2018;Extension of the five-parameter grain boundary stereological method to textured alloys&#x2019;, EP/F030819/1, also in collaboration with Professor Roher (rohrer@cmu.edu).</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Science and Engineering - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGSEN</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2016-08-17T14:01:32.6812665</lastEdited><Created>2013-09-03T06:10:27.0000000</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised</level></path><authors><author><firstname>V</firstname><surname>Randle</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>G.S</firstname><surname>Rohrer</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>H.M</firstname><surname>Miller</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>M</firstname><surname>Coleman</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>G.T</firstname><surname>Owen</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Valerie</firstname><surname>Randle</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Coleman</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4628-1077</orcid><order>7</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2016-08-17T14:01:32.6812665 v2 5522 2013-09-03 Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper 50774edc7f60dff63ee0cbd56be764b8 Valerie Randle Valerie Randle true false 73c5735de19c8a70acb41ab788081b67 0000-0002-4628-1077 Mark Coleman Mark Coleman true false 2013-09-03 FGSEN The five-parameter grain boundary distributions of grain boundary engineered nickel and copper specimens have been analyzed in detail. The relative areas of {1 1 1} planes in the entire population did not increase as a result of grain boundary engineering (GBE) and, in the Σ3-excluded population, decreased after GBE. This decrease occurred because the majority of the newly generated Σ3 grain boundaries were not coherent twins with {1 1 1} grain boundary plane orientations. GBE increased the proportion of Σ3 boundary length that was vicinal-to-{1 1 1} and the proportion of asymmetrical 〈1 1 0〉 tilt boundaries. There was a clear propensity for selection of particular planes or plane combinations which were associated with low energy. These plane types were analyzed in some detail, and it was shown that many of these boundaries were asymmetrical tilts comprising (or vicinal to) at least one low-index plane. Journal Article Acta Materialia 56 10 2363 2373 1359-6454 Grain boundary; Grain boundary twin; Electron backscatter diffraction; Grain boundary plane 31 12 2008 2008-12-31 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.039 This work, which was part funded by EPSRC grant EP/C51260X, represents part of an ongoing international collaboration with Professor Rohrer at Carnegie Mellon University, USA. The work, which was published in an IF 3.76 journal and has 35 citations so far, makes a significant contribution to understanding the microstructure of grain boundary engineered material in commercially available products. This was achieved by the novel ‘five-parameter’ methodology. It has led to a new EPSRC research grant, ‘Extension of the five-parameter grain boundary stereological method to textured alloys’, EP/F030819/1, also in collaboration with Professor Roher (rohrer@cmu.edu). COLLEGE NANME Science and Engineering - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGSEN Swansea University 2016-08-17T14:01:32.6812665 2013-09-03T06:10:27.0000000 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised V Randle 1 G.S Rohrer 2 H.M Miller 3 M Coleman 4 G.T Owen 5 Valerie Randle 6 Mark Coleman 0000-0002-4628-1077 7
title Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper
spellingShingle Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper
Valerie Randle
Mark Coleman
title_short Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper
title_full Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper
title_fullStr Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper
title_full_unstemmed Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper
title_sort Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper
author_id_str_mv 50774edc7f60dff63ee0cbd56be764b8
73c5735de19c8a70acb41ab788081b67
author_id_fullname_str_mv 50774edc7f60dff63ee0cbd56be764b8_***_Valerie Randle
73c5735de19c8a70acb41ab788081b67_***_Mark Coleman
author Valerie Randle
Mark Coleman
author2 V Randle
G.S Rohrer
H.M Miller
M Coleman
G.T Owen
Valerie Randle
Mark Coleman
format Journal article
container_title Acta Materialia
container_volume 56
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2363
publishDate 2008
institution Swansea University
issn 1359-6454
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.039
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description The five-parameter grain boundary distributions of grain boundary engineered nickel and copper specimens have been analyzed in detail. The relative areas of {1 1 1} planes in the entire population did not increase as a result of grain boundary engineering (GBE) and, in the Σ3-excluded population, decreased after GBE. This decrease occurred because the majority of the newly generated Σ3 grain boundaries were not coherent twins with {1 1 1} grain boundary plane orientations. GBE increased the proportion of Σ3 boundary length that was vicinal-to-{1 1 1} and the proportion of asymmetrical 〈1 1 0〉 tilt boundaries. There was a clear propensity for selection of particular planes or plane combinations which were associated with low energy. These plane types were analyzed in some detail, and it was shown that many of these boundaries were asymmetrical tilts comprising (or vicinal to) at least one low-index plane.
published_date 2008-12-31T03:06:38Z
_version_ 1763749709077282816
score 11.013731

Similar Items