No Cover Image

Journal article 1107 views 443 downloads

Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics

Alex Latham-Gambi Orcid Logo

The Review of Politics, Volume: 83, Issue: 2, Pages: 242 - 263

Swansea University Author: Alex Latham-Gambi Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1017/s003467052000090x

Abstract

This article examines Jeremy Waldron’s concept of the ‘circumstances of politics’ (CoP), which he describes as the felt need for a common decision in the face of disagreement. Waldron uses the CoP to detach certain issues surrounding civic virtue and institutional design from questions about substan...

Full description

Published in: The Review of Politics
ISSN: 0034-6705 1748-6858
Published: Notre Dame Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2021
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa54266
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2020-05-18T13:08:17Z
last_indexed 2021-04-30T03:18:14Z
id cronfa54266
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><datestamp>2021-04-29T17:45:47.9060677</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>54266</id><entry>2020-05-18</entry><title>Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8eb08f11c93bec9bc50e6622f644e5b6</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6217-7432</ORCID><firstname>Alex</firstname><surname>Latham-Gambi</surname><name>Alex Latham-Gambi</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-05-18</date><deptcode>LAWD</deptcode><abstract>This article examines Jeremy Waldron&#x2019;s concept of the &#x2018;circumstances of politics&#x2019; (CoP), which he describes as the felt need for a common decision in the face of disagreement. Waldron uses the CoP to detach certain issues surrounding civic virtue and institutional design from questions about substantive principles like justice, human rights etc.. While emphasis is often placed on the fact of disagreement, I argue that the other aspect of the CoP, the need for collective action, is in fact the more fundamental. Waldron&#x2019;s arguments rely on an understanding that there is expressive value in citizens affirming commitment to the political community and on an awareness of how the nature of politics as public collective action is structured by the constitutional architecture. I argue that a lopsided focus on disagreement threatens to obscure the fact the political sphere is itself a fragile achievement that is in need of continual support.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>The Review of Politics</journal><volume>83</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>242</paginationStart><paginationEnd>263</paginationEnd><publisher>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</publisher><placeOfPublication>Notre Dame</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0034-6705</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1748-6858</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1017/s003467052000090x</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Law</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>LAWD</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-04-29T17:45:47.9060677</lastEdited><Created>2020-05-18T11:56:59.5287575</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Alex</firstname><surname>Latham-Gambi</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6217-7432</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>54266__17283__61e65f6285c04acfa215521fe07f74c2.pdf</filename><originalFilename>54266.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-05-18T14:55:48.3077107</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>561056</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs><OutputDur><Id>69</Id><DataControllerName>Ruth Jones</DataControllerName><DataControllerOrcid>0000-0003-0199-0782</DataControllerOrcid><DataControllerEmail>C.Ruth.Jones@Swansea.ac.uk</DataControllerEmail><IsDataAvailableOnline>true</IsDataAvailableOnline><DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><IsDurRestrictions>true</IsDurRestrictions><DurRestrictionReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurEmbargoDate xsi:nil="true"/></OutputDur></OutputDurs></rfc1807>
spelling 2021-04-29T17:45:47.9060677 v2 54266 2020-05-18 Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics 8eb08f11c93bec9bc50e6622f644e5b6 0000-0001-6217-7432 Alex Latham-Gambi Alex Latham-Gambi true false 2020-05-18 LAWD This article examines Jeremy Waldron’s concept of the ‘circumstances of politics’ (CoP), which he describes as the felt need for a common decision in the face of disagreement. Waldron uses the CoP to detach certain issues surrounding civic virtue and institutional design from questions about substantive principles like justice, human rights etc.. While emphasis is often placed on the fact of disagreement, I argue that the other aspect of the CoP, the need for collective action, is in fact the more fundamental. Waldron’s arguments rely on an understanding that there is expressive value in citizens affirming commitment to the political community and on an awareness of how the nature of politics as public collective action is structured by the constitutional architecture. I argue that a lopsided focus on disagreement threatens to obscure the fact the political sphere is itself a fragile achievement that is in need of continual support. Journal Article The Review of Politics 83 2 242 263 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Notre Dame 0034-6705 1748-6858 1 1 2021 2021-01-01 10.1017/s003467052000090x COLLEGE NANME Law COLLEGE CODE LAWD Swansea University 2021-04-29T17:45:47.9060677 2020-05-18T11:56:59.5287575 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Alex Latham-Gambi 0000-0001-6217-7432 1 54266__17283__61e65f6285c04acfa215521fe07f74c2.pdf 54266.pdf 2020-05-18T14:55:48.3077107 Output 561056 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true true eng 69 Ruth Jones 0000-0003-0199-0782 C.Ruth.Jones@Swansea.ac.uk true true
title Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics
spellingShingle Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics
Alex Latham-Gambi
title_short Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics
title_full Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics
title_fullStr Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics
title_full_unstemmed Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics
title_sort Jeremy Waldron and the Circumstances of Politics
author_id_str_mv 8eb08f11c93bec9bc50e6622f644e5b6
author_id_fullname_str_mv 8eb08f11c93bec9bc50e6622f644e5b6_***_Alex Latham-Gambi
author Alex Latham-Gambi
author2 Alex Latham-Gambi
format Journal article
container_title The Review of Politics
container_volume 83
container_issue 2
container_start_page 242
publishDate 2021
institution Swansea University
issn 0034-6705
1748-6858
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s003467052000090x
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description This article examines Jeremy Waldron’s concept of the ‘circumstances of politics’ (CoP), which he describes as the felt need for a common decision in the face of disagreement. Waldron uses the CoP to detach certain issues surrounding civic virtue and institutional design from questions about substantive principles like justice, human rights etc.. While emphasis is often placed on the fact of disagreement, I argue that the other aspect of the CoP, the need for collective action, is in fact the more fundamental. Waldron’s arguments rely on an understanding that there is expressive value in citizens affirming commitment to the political community and on an awareness of how the nature of politics as public collective action is structured by the constitutional architecture. I argue that a lopsided focus on disagreement threatens to obscure the fact the political sphere is itself a fragile achievement that is in need of continual support.
published_date 2021-01-01T04:07:41Z
_version_ 1763753550652899328
score 11.037603

Similar Items