No Cover Image

Journal article 710 views 105 downloads

Doping and Moral Disapprovals

Mika Hämäläinen, Andrew Bloodworth Orcid Logo, Suvi Heikkinen

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 331 - 348

Swansea University Author: Andrew Bloodworth Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/17511321.2020.1762717

Abstract

This paper explores variance in how people morally disapprove wrongs related to doping. The variance may pertain to what type of moral disapproval a person uses or to what they disapprove of. Our exploration is both conceptual and empirical. Conceptually, we distinguish between four types of moral d...

Full description

Published in: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
ISSN: 1751-1321 1751-133X
Published: Informa UK Limited 2021
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa54081
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2020-04-29T13:22:32Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T14:31:57Z
id cronfa54081
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-11-02T13:21:49.4062939</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>54081</id><entry>2020-04-29</entry><title>Doping and Moral Disapprovals</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-4601-442X</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Bloodworth</surname><name>Andrew Bloodworth</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-04-29</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>This paper explores variance in how people morally disapprove wrongs related to doping. The variance may pertain to what type of moral disapproval a person uses or to what they disapprove of. Our exploration is both conceptual and empirical. Conceptually, we distinguish between four types of moral disapprovals that we call blame, judging blameworthy, condemnation and sadness. We elaborate these four moral phenomena through a conceptual scheme that we call the matrix of moral disapprovals. The matrix is the central conceptual innovation of our paper. It depicts how the four moral disapprovals relate to each other and characterises their typical instances. In the empirical part of the paper, we use the matrix of moral disapproval to examine how decision-makers in Finnish elite sport organisations talk about doping. The empirical examination is based on 31 interviews with decision-makers from Finnish elite sport organisations. Although we distinguish between the conceptual and empirical approaches in our paper, they are not fully separate, but support and inform each other.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Sport, Ethics and Philosophy</journal><volume>15</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>331</paginationStart><paginationEnd>348</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1751-1321</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1751-133X</issnElectronic><keywords>blame, condemnation, doping, moral philosophy, sadness</keywords><publishedDay>3</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-07-03</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/17511321.2020.1762717</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-11-02T13:21:49.4062939</lastEdited><Created>2020-04-29T08:46:03.7498247</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Mika</firstname><surname>H&#xE4;m&#xE4;l&#xE4;inen</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Bloodworth</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4601-442X</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Suvi</firstname><surname>Heikkinen</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>54081__17148__bb85333ac9f2439c896ebe2390af96a2.pdf</filename><originalFilename>54081.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-04-29T08:48:41.3458038</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>988951</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2021-11-13T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-11-02T13:21:49.4062939 v2 54081 2020-04-29 Doping and Moral Disapprovals 3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889 0000-0002-4601-442X Andrew Bloodworth Andrew Bloodworth true false 2020-04-29 STSC This paper explores variance in how people morally disapprove wrongs related to doping. The variance may pertain to what type of moral disapproval a person uses or to what they disapprove of. Our exploration is both conceptual and empirical. Conceptually, we distinguish between four types of moral disapprovals that we call blame, judging blameworthy, condemnation and sadness. We elaborate these four moral phenomena through a conceptual scheme that we call the matrix of moral disapprovals. The matrix is the central conceptual innovation of our paper. It depicts how the four moral disapprovals relate to each other and characterises their typical instances. In the empirical part of the paper, we use the matrix of moral disapproval to examine how decision-makers in Finnish elite sport organisations talk about doping. The empirical examination is based on 31 interviews with decision-makers from Finnish elite sport organisations. Although we distinguish between the conceptual and empirical approaches in our paper, they are not fully separate, but support and inform each other. Journal Article Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 3 331 348 Informa UK Limited 1751-1321 1751-133X blame, condemnation, doping, moral philosophy, sadness 3 7 2021 2021-07-03 10.1080/17511321.2020.1762717 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2022-11-02T13:21:49.4062939 2020-04-29T08:46:03.7498247 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Mika Hämäläinen 1 Andrew Bloodworth 0000-0002-4601-442X 2 Suvi Heikkinen 3 54081__17148__bb85333ac9f2439c896ebe2390af96a2.pdf 54081.pdf 2020-04-29T08:48:41.3458038 Output 988951 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2021-11-13T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Doping and Moral Disapprovals
spellingShingle Doping and Moral Disapprovals
Andrew Bloodworth
title_short Doping and Moral Disapprovals
title_full Doping and Moral Disapprovals
title_fullStr Doping and Moral Disapprovals
title_full_unstemmed Doping and Moral Disapprovals
title_sort Doping and Moral Disapprovals
author_id_str_mv 3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889
author_id_fullname_str_mv 3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889_***_Andrew Bloodworth
author Andrew Bloodworth
author2 Mika Hämäläinen
Andrew Bloodworth
Suvi Heikkinen
format Journal article
container_title Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
container_volume 15
container_issue 3
container_start_page 331
publishDate 2021
institution Swansea University
issn 1751-1321
1751-133X
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17511321.2020.1762717
publisher Informa UK Limited
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description This paper explores variance in how people morally disapprove wrongs related to doping. The variance may pertain to what type of moral disapproval a person uses or to what they disapprove of. Our exploration is both conceptual and empirical. Conceptually, we distinguish between four types of moral disapprovals that we call blame, judging blameworthy, condemnation and sadness. We elaborate these four moral phenomena through a conceptual scheme that we call the matrix of moral disapprovals. The matrix is the central conceptual innovation of our paper. It depicts how the four moral disapprovals relate to each other and characterises their typical instances. In the empirical part of the paper, we use the matrix of moral disapproval to examine how decision-makers in Finnish elite sport organisations talk about doping. The empirical examination is based on 31 interviews with decision-makers from Finnish elite sport organisations. Although we distinguish between the conceptual and empirical approaches in our paper, they are not fully separate, but support and inform each other.
published_date 2021-07-03T04:07:24Z
_version_ 1763753532276604928
score 11.013148

Similar Items