Journal article 842 views 137 downloads
Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset
Water, Volume: 12, Issue: 3, Start page: 840
Swansea University Authors: Salam A. A. Abbas , Yunqing Xuan
-
PDF | Version of Record
Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY).
Download (4.45MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.3390/w12030840
Abstract
Effective representation of precipitation inputs is one of the essential components in hydrological model structures, especially when gauge measurements for the modelled catchment are sparse. Assessment of the impact of precipitation pre-processing is often nontrivial as precipitation data are very...
Published in: | Water |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2073-4441 |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa53902 |
first_indexed |
2020-04-06T14:12:01Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2021-08-19T03:25:59Z |
id |
cronfa53902 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-08-18T14:32:44.8860429</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>53902</id><entry>2020-04-06</entry><title>Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>2aa12c228ee22b06b6c07b8f857ea4f3</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-5782-5319</ORCID><firstname>Salam A. A.</firstname><surname>Abbas</surname><name>Salam A. A. Abbas</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>true</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>3ece84458da360ff84fa95aa1c0c912b</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-2736-8625</ORCID><firstname>Yunqing</firstname><surname>Xuan</surname><name>Yunqing Xuan</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-04-06</date><abstract>Effective representation of precipitation inputs is one of the essential components in hydrological model structures, especially when gauge measurements for the modelled catchment are sparse. Assessment of the impact of precipitation pre-processing is often nontrivial as precipitation data are very limited in the first place. In this paper, we demonstrate a study using a semi-distributed hydrological model, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to examine the impact of different precipitation pre-processing methods on model calibration and the overall model performance with regards to the operational use. A river catchment in the UK is modelled to test against the three pre-processing methods: the Centroid Point Estimation Method (CPEM), the Grid Area Method (GAM) and the Grid Point Method (GPM). Cross-calibration and validation are then carried out by using the high-resolution Centre for Ecology & Hydrology–Gridded Estimate Areal Rainfall (CEH-GEAR) dataset. The results show that the proposed methods GAM and GPM can improve the model calibration significantly against the one calibrated with the existing CPEM method used by the model; the performance differences in the validation among the calibrated models, however, remain small and become irrelevant. The findings indicate that it is preferable to always make use of high-quality rainfall data, when available, with a better pre-processing method, even with models that are previously calibrated with low-quality rainfall inputs. It is also shown that such improvements are affected by the size of catchment and become less significant for smaller catchments.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Water</journal><volume>12</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>840</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2073-4441</issnElectronic><keywords>Hydrological modelling; Precipitation pre-processing; Calibration; Cross-validation; SWAT; Gridded Rainfall Dataset</keywords><publishedDay>17</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-03-17</publishedDate><doi>10.3390/w12030840</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2021-08-18T14:32:44.8860429</lastEdited><Created>2020-04-06T10:47:45.7636622</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Salam A. A.</firstname><surname>Abbas</surname><orcid>0000-0001-5782-5319</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Yunqing</firstname><surname>Xuan</surname><orcid>0000-0003-2736-8625</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>53902__17014__e111b769018a493a88aec8a0bea61380.pdf</filename><originalFilename>53902.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-04-06T10:49:20.9136525</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>4667809</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2021-08-18T14:32:44.8860429 v2 53902 2020-04-06 Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset 2aa12c228ee22b06b6c07b8f857ea4f3 0000-0001-5782-5319 Salam A. A. Abbas Salam A. A. Abbas true true 3ece84458da360ff84fa95aa1c0c912b 0000-0003-2736-8625 Yunqing Xuan Yunqing Xuan true false 2020-04-06 Effective representation of precipitation inputs is one of the essential components in hydrological model structures, especially when gauge measurements for the modelled catchment are sparse. Assessment of the impact of precipitation pre-processing is often nontrivial as precipitation data are very limited in the first place. In this paper, we demonstrate a study using a semi-distributed hydrological model, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to examine the impact of different precipitation pre-processing methods on model calibration and the overall model performance with regards to the operational use. A river catchment in the UK is modelled to test against the three pre-processing methods: the Centroid Point Estimation Method (CPEM), the Grid Area Method (GAM) and the Grid Point Method (GPM). Cross-calibration and validation are then carried out by using the high-resolution Centre for Ecology & Hydrology–Gridded Estimate Areal Rainfall (CEH-GEAR) dataset. The results show that the proposed methods GAM and GPM can improve the model calibration significantly against the one calibrated with the existing CPEM method used by the model; the performance differences in the validation among the calibrated models, however, remain small and become irrelevant. The findings indicate that it is preferable to always make use of high-quality rainfall data, when available, with a better pre-processing method, even with models that are previously calibrated with low-quality rainfall inputs. It is also shown that such improvements are affected by the size of catchment and become less significant for smaller catchments. Journal Article Water 12 3 840 MDPI AG 2073-4441 Hydrological modelling; Precipitation pre-processing; Calibration; Cross-validation; SWAT; Gridded Rainfall Dataset 17 3 2020 2020-03-17 10.3390/w12030840 COLLEGE NANME Engineering COLLEGE CODE Swansea University 2021-08-18T14:32:44.8860429 2020-04-06T10:47:45.7636622 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised Salam A. A. Abbas 0000-0001-5782-5319 1 Yunqing Xuan 0000-0003-2736-8625 2 53902__17014__e111b769018a493a88aec8a0bea61380.pdf 53902.pdf 2020-04-06T10:49:20.9136525 Output 4667809 application/pdf Version of Record true Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset |
spellingShingle |
Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset Salam A. A. Abbas Yunqing Xuan |
title_short |
Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset |
title_full |
Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset |
title_fullStr |
Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset |
title_sort |
Impact of Precipitation Pre-Processing Methods on Hydrological Model Performance using High-Resolution Gridded Dataset |
author_id_str_mv |
2aa12c228ee22b06b6c07b8f857ea4f3 3ece84458da360ff84fa95aa1c0c912b |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
2aa12c228ee22b06b6c07b8f857ea4f3_***_Salam A. A. Abbas 3ece84458da360ff84fa95aa1c0c912b_***_Yunqing Xuan |
author |
Salam A. A. Abbas Yunqing Xuan |
author2 |
Salam A. A. Abbas Yunqing Xuan |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Water |
container_volume |
12 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
840 |
publishDate |
2020 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
2073-4441 |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/w12030840 |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Uncategorised |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Effective representation of precipitation inputs is one of the essential components in hydrological model structures, especially when gauge measurements for the modelled catchment are sparse. Assessment of the impact of precipitation pre-processing is often nontrivial as precipitation data are very limited in the first place. In this paper, we demonstrate a study using a semi-distributed hydrological model, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to examine the impact of different precipitation pre-processing methods on model calibration and the overall model performance with regards to the operational use. A river catchment in the UK is modelled to test against the three pre-processing methods: the Centroid Point Estimation Method (CPEM), the Grid Area Method (GAM) and the Grid Point Method (GPM). Cross-calibration and validation are then carried out by using the high-resolution Centre for Ecology & Hydrology–Gridded Estimate Areal Rainfall (CEH-GEAR) dataset. The results show that the proposed methods GAM and GPM can improve the model calibration significantly against the one calibrated with the existing CPEM method used by the model; the performance differences in the validation among the calibrated models, however, remain small and become irrelevant. The findings indicate that it is preferable to always make use of high-quality rainfall data, when available, with a better pre-processing method, even with models that are previously calibrated with low-quality rainfall inputs. It is also shown that such improvements are affected by the size of catchment and become less significant for smaller catchments. |
published_date |
2020-03-17T14:00:46Z |
_version_ |
1821414309059624960 |
score |
11.048129 |