Journal article 1057 views 159 downloads
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells
Materials, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, Start page: 949
Swansea University Authors:
Peter Holliman , Arthur Connell, Eurig Jones, Chris Kershaw
-
PDF | Version of Record
Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY).
Download (4.56MB)
DOI (Published version): 10.3390/ma13040949
Abstract
Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates av...
Published in: | Materials |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1996-1944 |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa53743 |
first_indexed |
2020-03-05T13:32:01Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2020-10-24T03:06:11Z |
id |
cronfa53743 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-10-23T11:34:44.8293777</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>53743</id><entry>2020-03-05</entry><title>Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c8f52394d776279c9c690dc26066ddf9</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-9911-8513</ORCID><firstname>Peter</firstname><surname>Holliman</surname><name>Peter Holliman</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>03967ce19a2f81a255587c196f6ede3f</sid><firstname>Arthur</firstname><surname>Connell</surname><name>Arthur Connell</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>c6d92fb58a378914f3fdff316a9b4b29</sid><firstname>Eurig</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><name>Eurig Jones</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>712418e62ef36662d4034e102107a1c8</sid><firstname>Chris</firstname><surname>Kershaw</surname><name>Chris Kershaw</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2020-03-05</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates available and also decrease the energy requirements during device manufacture. In this work, titanium dioxide (TiO2) mesoporous scaffolds have been compared with metal oxide oxidation catalysts: cerium dioxide (CeO2) and manganese dioxide (MnO2). For MnO2, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a low energy band gap metal oxide has been used as a scaffold in the PSC devices. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that organic binder removal is completed at temperatures of 350 °C and 275 °C for CeO2 and MnO2, respectively. By comparison, the binder removal from TiO2 pastes requires temperatures >500 °C. CH3NH3PbBr3 PSC devices that were fabricated while using MnO2 pastes sintered at 550 °C show slightly improved PCE (η = 3.9%) versus mesoporous TiO2 devices (η = 3.8%) as a result of increased open circuit voltage (Voc). However, the resultant PSC devices showed no efficiency despite apparently complete binder removal during lower temperature (325 °C) sintering using CeO2 or MnO2 pastes.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Materials</journal><volume>13</volume><journalNumber>4</journalNumber><paginationStart>949</paginationStart><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><issnElectronic>1996-1944</issnElectronic><keywords>organolead Perovskite; low temperature sintering; mesoporous scaffold; oxidation catalyst</keywords><publishedDay>20</publishedDay><publishedMonth>2</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-02-20</publishedDate><doi>10.3390/ma13040949</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-10-23T11:34:44.8293777</lastEdited><Created>2020-03-05T10:05:25.5922360</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Peter</firstname><surname>Holliman</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9911-8513</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Arthur</firstname><surname>Connell</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Eurig</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Chris</firstname><surname>Kershaw</surname><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>53743__16776__967de792bb8a418bbe55573ce85cefeb.pdf</filename><originalFilename>holliman2020.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-03-05T10:07:08.6944637</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>4780446</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2020-10-23T11:34:44.8293777 v2 53743 2020-03-05 Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells c8f52394d776279c9c690dc26066ddf9 0000-0002-9911-8513 Peter Holliman Peter Holliman true false 03967ce19a2f81a255587c196f6ede3f Arthur Connell Arthur Connell true false c6d92fb58a378914f3fdff316a9b4b29 Eurig Jones Eurig Jones true false 712418e62ef36662d4034e102107a1c8 Chris Kershaw Chris Kershaw true false 2020-03-05 EAAS Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates available and also decrease the energy requirements during device manufacture. In this work, titanium dioxide (TiO2) mesoporous scaffolds have been compared with metal oxide oxidation catalysts: cerium dioxide (CeO2) and manganese dioxide (MnO2). For MnO2, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a low energy band gap metal oxide has been used as a scaffold in the PSC devices. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that organic binder removal is completed at temperatures of 350 °C and 275 °C for CeO2 and MnO2, respectively. By comparison, the binder removal from TiO2 pastes requires temperatures >500 °C. CH3NH3PbBr3 PSC devices that were fabricated while using MnO2 pastes sintered at 550 °C show slightly improved PCE (η = 3.9%) versus mesoporous TiO2 devices (η = 3.8%) as a result of increased open circuit voltage (Voc). However, the resultant PSC devices showed no efficiency despite apparently complete binder removal during lower temperature (325 °C) sintering using CeO2 or MnO2 pastes. Journal Article Materials 13 4 949 MDPI AG 1996-1944 organolead Perovskite; low temperature sintering; mesoporous scaffold; oxidation catalyst 20 2 2020 2020-02-20 10.3390/ma13040949 COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University 2020-10-23T11:34:44.8293777 2020-03-05T10:05:25.5922360 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering Peter Holliman 0000-0002-9911-8513 1 Arthur Connell 2 Eurig Jones 3 Chris Kershaw 4 53743__16776__967de792bb8a418bbe55573ce85cefeb.pdf holliman2020.pdf 2020-03-05T10:07:08.6944637 Output 4780446 application/pdf Version of Record true Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
title |
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
spellingShingle |
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells Peter Holliman Arthur Connell Eurig Jones Chris Kershaw |
title_short |
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_full |
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_fullStr |
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_sort |
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
author_id_str_mv |
c8f52394d776279c9c690dc26066ddf9 03967ce19a2f81a255587c196f6ede3f c6d92fb58a378914f3fdff316a9b4b29 712418e62ef36662d4034e102107a1c8 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
c8f52394d776279c9c690dc26066ddf9_***_Peter Holliman 03967ce19a2f81a255587c196f6ede3f_***_Arthur Connell c6d92fb58a378914f3fdff316a9b4b29_***_Eurig Jones 712418e62ef36662d4034e102107a1c8_***_Chris Kershaw |
author |
Peter Holliman Arthur Connell Eurig Jones Chris Kershaw |
author2 |
Peter Holliman Arthur Connell Eurig Jones Chris Kershaw |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Materials |
container_volume |
13 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
949 |
publishDate |
2020 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1996-1944 |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/ma13040949 |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates available and also decrease the energy requirements during device manufacture. In this work, titanium dioxide (TiO2) mesoporous scaffolds have been compared with metal oxide oxidation catalysts: cerium dioxide (CeO2) and manganese dioxide (MnO2). For MnO2, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a low energy band gap metal oxide has been used as a scaffold in the PSC devices. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that organic binder removal is completed at temperatures of 350 °C and 275 °C for CeO2 and MnO2, respectively. By comparison, the binder removal from TiO2 pastes requires temperatures >500 °C. CH3NH3PbBr3 PSC devices that were fabricated while using MnO2 pastes sintered at 550 °C show slightly improved PCE (η = 3.9%) versus mesoporous TiO2 devices (η = 3.8%) as a result of increased open circuit voltage (Voc). However, the resultant PSC devices showed no efficiency despite apparently complete binder removal during lower temperature (325 °C) sintering using CeO2 or MnO2 pastes. |
published_date |
2020-02-20T07:55:18Z |
_version_ |
1831443804454912000 |
score |
11.059037 |