No Cover Image

Other 1131 views

Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations

Zoe Fisher Orcid Logo, Jessica Mead, Zoe Fisher, Lowri Wilkie, Katie Gibbs, Julia Pridmore, Jeremy Tree, Andrew Kemp Orcid Logo

authorea

Swansea University Authors: Zoe Fisher Orcid Logo, Andrew Kemp Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.22541/au.156649190.08734276

Abstract

The construct of wellbeing has been criticised as a neoliberal construction of western individualism that ignores wider systemic issues including increasing burden of chronic disease, widening inequality, concerns over environmental degradation and anthropogenic climate change. While these criticism...

Full description

Published in: authorea
Online Access: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.156649190.08734276
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa51906
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2019-09-16T14:25:04Z
last_indexed 2019-09-16T14:25:04Z
id cronfa51906
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-09-16T10:40:20.2874973</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>51906</id><entry>2019-09-16</entry><title>Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>b7d5965d35de6f683716c6eb1e82ff81</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8150-2499</ORCID><firstname>Zoe</firstname><surname>Fisher</surname><name>Zoe Fisher</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>dfd05900f0e2409d3f67dca227c59a93</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-1146-3791</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Kemp</surname><name>Andrew Kemp</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-09-16</date><deptcode>THER</deptcode><abstract>The construct of wellbeing has been criticised as a neoliberal construction of western individualism that ignores wider systemic issues including increasing burden of chronic disease, widening inequality, concerns over environmental degradation and anthropogenic climate change. While these criticisms overlook recent developments, there remains a need for biopsychosocial models that extend theoretical grounding beyond individual wellbeing, incorporating overlapping contextual issues relating to community and environment. Our first GENIAL model&#xA0;(Kemp 2017) provided a more expansive view of pathways to longevity in the context of individual health and wellbeing, emphasising bidirectional links to positive social ties and the impact of sociocultural factors. In this paper, we build on these ideas and propose GENIAL 2.0, focusing on intersecting individual-community-environmental contributions to health and wellbeing, and laying an evidence-based, theoretical framework on which future research and innovative therapeutic innovations could be based. We suggest that our transdisciplinary model of wellbeing - focusing on individual, community and environmental contributions to personal wellbeing - will help to move the research field forward. In reconceptualising wellbeing, GENIAL 2.0 bridges the gap between psychological science and population health health systems, and presents opportunities for enhancing the health and wellbeing of people living with chronic conditions. Implications for future generations including the very survival of our species are discussed.&#xA0;&#xA0;</abstract><type>Other</type><journal>authorea</journal><publisher/><keywords/><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi>10.22541/au.156649190.08734276</doi><url>https://doi.org/10.22541/au.156649190.08734276</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Therapies</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>THER</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-09-16T10:40:20.2874973</lastEdited><Created>2019-09-16T10:37:52.8170990</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Zoe</firstname><surname>Fisher</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8150-2499</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Jessica</firstname><surname>Mead</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Zoe</firstname><surname>Fisher</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Lowri</firstname><surname>Wilkie</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Katie</firstname><surname>Gibbs</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Julia</firstname><surname>Pridmore</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Kemp</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1146-3791</orcid><order>8</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-09-16T10:40:20.2874973 v2 51906 2019-09-16 Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations b7d5965d35de6f683716c6eb1e82ff81 0000-0001-8150-2499 Zoe Fisher Zoe Fisher true false dfd05900f0e2409d3f67dca227c59a93 0000-0003-1146-3791 Andrew Kemp Andrew Kemp true false 2019-09-16 THER The construct of wellbeing has been criticised as a neoliberal construction of western individualism that ignores wider systemic issues including increasing burden of chronic disease, widening inequality, concerns over environmental degradation and anthropogenic climate change. While these criticisms overlook recent developments, there remains a need for biopsychosocial models that extend theoretical grounding beyond individual wellbeing, incorporating overlapping contextual issues relating to community and environment. Our first GENIAL model (Kemp 2017) provided a more expansive view of pathways to longevity in the context of individual health and wellbeing, emphasising bidirectional links to positive social ties and the impact of sociocultural factors. In this paper, we build on these ideas and propose GENIAL 2.0, focusing on intersecting individual-community-environmental contributions to health and wellbeing, and laying an evidence-based, theoretical framework on which future research and innovative therapeutic innovations could be based. We suggest that our transdisciplinary model of wellbeing - focusing on individual, community and environmental contributions to personal wellbeing - will help to move the research field forward. In reconceptualising wellbeing, GENIAL 2.0 bridges the gap between psychological science and population health health systems, and presents opportunities for enhancing the health and wellbeing of people living with chronic conditions. Implications for future generations including the very survival of our species are discussed.   Other authorea 0 0 0 0001-01-01 10.22541/au.156649190.08734276 https://doi.org/10.22541/au.156649190.08734276 COLLEGE NANME Therapies COLLEGE CODE THER Swansea University 2019-09-16T10:40:20.2874973 2019-09-16T10:37:52.8170990 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Zoe Fisher 0000-0001-8150-2499 1 Jessica Mead 2 Zoe Fisher 3 Lowri Wilkie 4 Katie Gibbs 5 Julia Pridmore 6 Jeremy Tree 7 Andrew Kemp 0000-0003-1146-3791 8
title Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations
spellingShingle Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations
Zoe Fisher
Andrew Kemp
title_short Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations
title_full Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations
title_fullStr Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations
title_sort Rethinking wellbeing: Toward a more ethical science of wellbeing that considers current and future generations
author_id_str_mv b7d5965d35de6f683716c6eb1e82ff81
dfd05900f0e2409d3f67dca227c59a93
author_id_fullname_str_mv b7d5965d35de6f683716c6eb1e82ff81_***_Zoe Fisher
dfd05900f0e2409d3f67dca227c59a93_***_Andrew Kemp
author Zoe Fisher
Andrew Kemp
author2 Zoe Fisher
Jessica Mead
Zoe Fisher
Lowri Wilkie
Katie Gibbs
Julia Pridmore
Jeremy Tree
Andrew Kemp
format Other
container_title authorea
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.22541/au.156649190.08734276
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
url https://doi.org/10.22541/au.156649190.08734276
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description The construct of wellbeing has been criticised as a neoliberal construction of western individualism that ignores wider systemic issues including increasing burden of chronic disease, widening inequality, concerns over environmental degradation and anthropogenic climate change. While these criticisms overlook recent developments, there remains a need for biopsychosocial models that extend theoretical grounding beyond individual wellbeing, incorporating overlapping contextual issues relating to community and environment. Our first GENIAL model (Kemp 2017) provided a more expansive view of pathways to longevity in the context of individual health and wellbeing, emphasising bidirectional links to positive social ties and the impact of sociocultural factors. In this paper, we build on these ideas and propose GENIAL 2.0, focusing on intersecting individual-community-environmental contributions to health and wellbeing, and laying an evidence-based, theoretical framework on which future research and innovative therapeutic innovations could be based. We suggest that our transdisciplinary model of wellbeing - focusing on individual, community and environmental contributions to personal wellbeing - will help to move the research field forward. In reconceptualising wellbeing, GENIAL 2.0 bridges the gap between psychological science and population health health systems, and presents opportunities for enhancing the health and wellbeing of people living with chronic conditions. Implications for future generations including the very survival of our species are discussed.  
published_date 0001-01-01T04:03:58Z
_version_ 1763753316270997504
score 11.013596

Similar Items