No Cover Image

Journal article 1156 views 296 downloads

The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance

James Butterfield, Jamie Tallent, Stephen David Patterson, Owen Jeffries, Louis Howe, Mark Waldron Orcid Logo

Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité

Swansea University Author: Mark Waldron Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1051/sm/2019027

Abstract

The validity of the TritonWear ® device to measure swimming performance Was Investigated, with a pre-determined analytical goal of 6%. Twenty youth swimmers completed a 100m swim in a 25m pool, swimming breaststroke freestyle gold wearing the TritonWear ® device, whilst being white filmed Above and...

Full description

Published in: Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité
ISSN: 2118-5735 2118-5743
Published: 2019
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa51616
first_indexed 2019-08-29T14:53:23Z
last_indexed 2019-10-15T14:30:17Z
id cronfa51616
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-10-15T11:32:37.8674771</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>51616</id><entry>2019-08-29</entry><title>The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2720-4615</ORCID><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Waldron</surname><name>Mark Waldron</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-08-29</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>The validity of the TritonWear &#xAE; device to measure swimming performance Was Investigated, with a pre-determined analytical goal of 6%. Twenty youth swimmers completed a 100m swim in a 25m pool, swimming breaststroke freestyle gold wearing the TritonWear &#xAE; device, whilst being white filmed Above and below water with three cameras. 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) and coefficient of variation (% CV) were used to calculate error. Systematic biases ( P&#x2009;&lt;0.05) were found between the two systems only for distance per stroke during breaststroke. Freestyle metrics agreement ranked between 1.06% and 10.40% CV, except for distance per stroke (CV = 14.64%), and time underwater (CV = 18.15%). Breaststroke metrics ranked between 0.95% and 13.74% CV, except for time underwater (CV = 25.76%). The smallest errors were found for split-times, speed, stroke-count and stroke-rate, across both strokes (all &lt;5% CV). The TritonWear &#xAE; can be used for basic metrics of performance, Such As split-time speed and aim the error of more complex measurements, Such As time underwater gold turn-times, render em Unable to Identify typical exchange performance.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Movement &amp; Sport Sciences - Science &amp; Motricit&#xE9;</journal><publisher/><issnPrint>2118-5735</issnPrint><issnElectronic>2118-5743</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2019</publishedYear><publishedDate>2019-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1051/sm/2019027</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-10-15T11:32:37.8674771</lastEdited><Created>2019-08-29T09:26:28.4211918</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Butterfield</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Jamie</firstname><surname>Tallent</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Stephen David</firstname><surname>Patterson</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Owen</firstname><surname>Jeffries</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Louis</firstname><surname>Howe</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Waldron</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2720-4615</orcid><order>6</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0051616-29082019093700.pdf</filename><originalFilename>butterfield2019.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-08-29T09:37:00.1470000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>226330</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2019-10-15T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-10-15T11:32:37.8674771 v2 51616 2019-08-29 The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance 70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa 0000-0002-2720-4615 Mark Waldron Mark Waldron true false 2019-08-29 EAAS The validity of the TritonWear ® device to measure swimming performance Was Investigated, with a pre-determined analytical goal of 6%. Twenty youth swimmers completed a 100m swim in a 25m pool, swimming breaststroke freestyle gold wearing the TritonWear ® device, whilst being white filmed Above and below water with three cameras. 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) and coefficient of variation (% CV) were used to calculate error. Systematic biases ( P <0.05) were found between the two systems only for distance per stroke during breaststroke. Freestyle metrics agreement ranked between 1.06% and 10.40% CV, except for distance per stroke (CV = 14.64%), and time underwater (CV = 18.15%). Breaststroke metrics ranked between 0.95% and 13.74% CV, except for time underwater (CV = 25.76%). The smallest errors were found for split-times, speed, stroke-count and stroke-rate, across both strokes (all <5% CV). The TritonWear ® can be used for basic metrics of performance, Such As split-time speed and aim the error of more complex measurements, Such As time underwater gold turn-times, render em Unable to Identify typical exchange performance. Journal Article Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité 2118-5735 2118-5743 31 12 2019 2019-12-31 10.1051/sm/2019027 COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University 2019-10-15T11:32:37.8674771 2019-08-29T09:26:28.4211918 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences James Butterfield 1 Jamie Tallent 2 Stephen David Patterson 3 Owen Jeffries 4 Louis Howe 5 Mark Waldron 0000-0002-2720-4615 6 0051616-29082019093700.pdf butterfield2019.pdf 2019-08-29T09:37:00.1470000 Output 226330 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2019-10-15T00:00:00.0000000 false eng
title The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance
spellingShingle The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance
Mark Waldron
title_short The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance
title_full The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance
title_fullStr The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance
title_full_unstemmed The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance
title_sort The validity of a head-worn inertial sensor for measurements of swimming performance
author_id_str_mv 70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa
author_id_fullname_str_mv 70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa_***_Mark Waldron
author Mark Waldron
author2 James Butterfield
Jamie Tallent
Stephen David Patterson
Owen Jeffries
Louis Howe
Mark Waldron
format Journal article
container_title Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité
publishDate 2019
institution Swansea University
issn 2118-5735
2118-5743
doi_str_mv 10.1051/sm/2019027
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description The validity of the TritonWear ® device to measure swimming performance Was Investigated, with a pre-determined analytical goal of 6%. Twenty youth swimmers completed a 100m swim in a 25m pool, swimming breaststroke freestyle gold wearing the TritonWear ® device, whilst being white filmed Above and below water with three cameras. 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) and coefficient of variation (% CV) were used to calculate error. Systematic biases ( P <0.05) were found between the two systems only for distance per stroke during breaststroke. Freestyle metrics agreement ranked between 1.06% and 10.40% CV, except for distance per stroke (CV = 14.64%), and time underwater (CV = 18.15%). Breaststroke metrics ranked between 0.95% and 13.74% CV, except for time underwater (CV = 25.76%). The smallest errors were found for split-times, speed, stroke-count and stroke-rate, across both strokes (all <5% CV). The TritonWear ® can be used for basic metrics of performance, Such As split-time speed and aim the error of more complex measurements, Such As time underwater gold turn-times, render em Unable to Identify typical exchange performance.
published_date 2019-12-31T04:41:18Z
_version_ 1856983719138557952
score 11.096068

Similar Items