No Cover Image

Journal article 734 views 180 downloads

The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia

Sarah Bate, Rachel J. Bennetts, Jeremy Tree Orcid Logo, Amanda Adams, Ebony Murray

Cognition, Volume: 192, Start page: 104031

Swansea University Author: Jeremy Tree Orcid Logo

  • 51180.pdf

    PDF | Accepted Manuscript

    Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND).

    Download (346.52KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104031

Abstract

A prevailing debate in the psychological literature concerns the domain-specificity of the face recognition system, where evidence from typical and neurological participants has been interpreted as evidence that faces are “special”. Although several studies have investigated the same question in cas...

Full description

Published in: Cognition
ISSN: 00100277
Published: 2019
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa51180
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2019-07-25T17:48:17Z
last_indexed 2020-10-23T03:02:49Z
id cronfa51180
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-10-22T14:17:46.4467726</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>51180</id><entry>2019-07-25</entry><title>The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6000-8125</ORCID><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><name>Jeremy Tree</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-07-25</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>A prevailing debate in the psychological literature concerns the domain-specificity of the face recognition system, where evidence from typical and neurological participants has been interpreted as evidence that faces are &#x201C;special&#x201D;. Although several studies have investigated the same question in cases of developmental prosopagnosia, the vast majority of this evidence has recently been discounted due to methodological concerns. This leaves an uncomfortable void in the literature, restricting our understanding of the typical and atypical development of the face recognition system. The current study addressed this issue in 40 individuals with developmental prosopagnosia, completing a sequential same/different face and biological (hands) and non-biological (houses) object matching task, with upright and inverted conditions. Findings support domain-specific accounts of face-processing for both hands and houses: while significant correlations emerged between all the object categories, no condition correlated with performance in the upright faces condition. Further, a categorical analysis demonstrated that, when face matching was impaired, object matching skills were classically dissociated in six out of 15 individuals (four for both categories). These findings provide evidence about domain-specificity in developmental disorders of face recognition, and present a theoretically-driven means of partitioning developmental prosopagnosia.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Cognition</journal><volume>192</volume><paginationStart>104031</paginationStart><publisher/><issnPrint>00100277</issnPrint><keywords/><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2019</publishedYear><publishedDate>2019-11-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104031</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-10-22T14:17:46.4467726</lastEdited><Created>2019-07-25T10:31:01.2397007</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Sarah</firstname><surname>Bate</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Rachel J.</firstname><surname>Bennetts</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6000-8125</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Amanda</firstname><surname>Adams</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Ebony</firstname><surname>Murray</surname><order>5</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0051180-12082019161100.pdf</filename><originalFilename>51180.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-08-12T16:11:00.5630000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>337897</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2020-07-24T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2020-10-22T14:17:46.4467726 v2 51180 2019-07-25 The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad 0000-0001-6000-8125 Jeremy Tree Jeremy Tree true false 2019-07-25 HPS A prevailing debate in the psychological literature concerns the domain-specificity of the face recognition system, where evidence from typical and neurological participants has been interpreted as evidence that faces are “special”. Although several studies have investigated the same question in cases of developmental prosopagnosia, the vast majority of this evidence has recently been discounted due to methodological concerns. This leaves an uncomfortable void in the literature, restricting our understanding of the typical and atypical development of the face recognition system. The current study addressed this issue in 40 individuals with developmental prosopagnosia, completing a sequential same/different face and biological (hands) and non-biological (houses) object matching task, with upright and inverted conditions. Findings support domain-specific accounts of face-processing for both hands and houses: while significant correlations emerged between all the object categories, no condition correlated with performance in the upright faces condition. Further, a categorical analysis demonstrated that, when face matching was impaired, object matching skills were classically dissociated in six out of 15 individuals (four for both categories). These findings provide evidence about domain-specificity in developmental disorders of face recognition, and present a theoretically-driven means of partitioning developmental prosopagnosia. Journal Article Cognition 192 104031 00100277 30 11 2019 2019-11-30 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104031 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University 2020-10-22T14:17:46.4467726 2019-07-25T10:31:01.2397007 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Sarah Bate 1 Rachel J. Bennetts 2 Jeremy Tree 0000-0001-6000-8125 3 Amanda Adams 4 Ebony Murray 5 0051180-12082019161100.pdf 51180.pdf 2019-08-12T16:11:00.5630000 Output 337897 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2020-07-24T00:00:00.0000000 Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND). true eng
title The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia
spellingShingle The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia
Jeremy Tree
title_short The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia
title_full The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia
title_fullStr The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia
title_full_unstemmed The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia
title_sort The domain-specificity of face matching impairments in 40 cases of developmental prosopagnosia
author_id_str_mv 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad
author_id_fullname_str_mv 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad_***_Jeremy Tree
author Jeremy Tree
author2 Sarah Bate
Rachel J. Bennetts
Jeremy Tree
Amanda Adams
Ebony Murray
format Journal article
container_title Cognition
container_volume 192
container_start_page 104031
publishDate 2019
institution Swansea University
issn 00100277
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104031
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description A prevailing debate in the psychological literature concerns the domain-specificity of the face recognition system, where evidence from typical and neurological participants has been interpreted as evidence that faces are “special”. Although several studies have investigated the same question in cases of developmental prosopagnosia, the vast majority of this evidence has recently been discounted due to methodological concerns. This leaves an uncomfortable void in the literature, restricting our understanding of the typical and atypical development of the face recognition system. The current study addressed this issue in 40 individuals with developmental prosopagnosia, completing a sequential same/different face and biological (hands) and non-biological (houses) object matching task, with upright and inverted conditions. Findings support domain-specific accounts of face-processing for both hands and houses: while significant correlations emerged between all the object categories, no condition correlated with performance in the upright faces condition. Further, a categorical analysis demonstrated that, when face matching was impaired, object matching skills were classically dissociated in six out of 15 individuals (four for both categories). These findings provide evidence about domain-specificity in developmental disorders of face recognition, and present a theoretically-driven means of partitioning developmental prosopagnosia.
published_date 2019-11-30T04:02:58Z
_version_ 1763753253877579776
score 11.016593

Similar Items