No Cover Image

Journal article 957 views 235 downloads

Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior

Carmen M. Fernández-Posada, Andrew Barron

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Volume: 518, Pages: 1 - 9

Swansea University Author: Andrew Barron

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.05.006

Abstract

Tin side of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments (i.e. tempered, heat strengthened, chemically strengthened) and without treatment (annealed soda-lime glass) have been compositional and surface characterized and then, compared with Gorilla Glass®. Surface flaws from the strengt...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
ISSN: 0022-3093
Published: 2019
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa50387
first_indexed 2019-05-16T14:33:47Z
last_indexed 2019-07-18T21:35:18Z
id cronfa50387
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-07-18T15:23:54.7602399</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>50387</id><entry>2019-05-16</entry><title>Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>92e452f20936d688d36f91c78574241d</sid><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Barron</surname><name>Andrew Barron</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-05-16</date><abstract>Tin side of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments (i.e. tempered, heat strengthened, chemically strengthened) and without treatment (annealed soda-lime glass) have been compositional and surface characterized and then, compared with Gorilla Glass&#xAE;. Surface flaws from the strength treatment were observed in thermally treated samples by AFM. Raman studies show differences in the network connectivity (Q2/Q1 ratio) because the different structures caused by the treatments. XPS was used to evaluate the oxidation state of the tin and compare the variations through the different treatments. Complementary, a study about the crack behaviour using a Vickers indenter was performed; different cracking pattern was obtained for float soda-lime glass in comparison with Gorilla Glass&#xAE;. In addition, the IQ2:IQ1 ratio as determined from Raman spectroscopy correlates with crack size from indentations.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids</journal><volume>518</volume><paginationStart>1</paginationStart><paginationEnd>9</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0022-3093</issnPrint><keywords>Glass, Structure, Tin-side, Indentation, Strength, AFM, XPS</keywords><publishedDay>15</publishedDay><publishedMonth>8</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2019</publishedYear><publishedDate>2019-08-15</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.05.006</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-07-18T15:23:54.7602399</lastEdited><Created>2019-05-16T09:27:01.5860809</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Carmen M.</firstname><surname>Fern&#xE1;ndez-Posada</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Barron</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0050387-16052019143422.pdf</filename><originalFilename>fernandez-posada2019.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-05-16T14:34:22.2070000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>1148422</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2020-05-15T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-07-18T15:23:54.7602399 v2 50387 2019-05-16 Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior 92e452f20936d688d36f91c78574241d Andrew Barron Andrew Barron true false 2019-05-16 Tin side of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments (i.e. tempered, heat strengthened, chemically strengthened) and without treatment (annealed soda-lime glass) have been compositional and surface characterized and then, compared with Gorilla Glass®. Surface flaws from the strength treatment were observed in thermally treated samples by AFM. Raman studies show differences in the network connectivity (Q2/Q1 ratio) because the different structures caused by the treatments. XPS was used to evaluate the oxidation state of the tin and compare the variations through the different treatments. Complementary, a study about the crack behaviour using a Vickers indenter was performed; different cracking pattern was obtained for float soda-lime glass in comparison with Gorilla Glass®. In addition, the IQ2:IQ1 ratio as determined from Raman spectroscopy correlates with crack size from indentations. Journal Article Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 518 1 9 0022-3093 Glass, Structure, Tin-side, Indentation, Strength, AFM, XPS 15 8 2019 2019-08-15 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.05.006 COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University 2019-07-18T15:23:54.7602399 2019-05-16T09:27:01.5860809 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering Carmen M. Fernández-Posada 1 Andrew Barron 2 0050387-16052019143422.pdf fernandez-posada2019.pdf 2019-05-16T14:34:22.2070000 Output 1148422 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2020-05-15T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior
spellingShingle Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior
Andrew Barron
title_short Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior
title_full Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior
title_fullStr Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior
title_sort Analysis of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments: Emphasis on the tin side, defects, structure connectivity and cracking behavior
author_id_str_mv 92e452f20936d688d36f91c78574241d
author_id_fullname_str_mv 92e452f20936d688d36f91c78574241d_***_Andrew Barron
author Andrew Barron
author2 Carmen M. Fernández-Posada
Andrew Barron
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
container_volume 518
container_start_page 1
publishDate 2019
institution Swansea University
issn 0022-3093
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.05.006
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Chemical Engineering
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Tin side of commercial glasses with different strengthening treatments (i.e. tempered, heat strengthened, chemically strengthened) and without treatment (annealed soda-lime glass) have been compositional and surface characterized and then, compared with Gorilla Glass®. Surface flaws from the strength treatment were observed in thermally treated samples by AFM. Raman studies show differences in the network connectivity (Q2/Q1 ratio) because the different structures caused by the treatments. XPS was used to evaluate the oxidation state of the tin and compare the variations through the different treatments. Complementary, a study about the crack behaviour using a Vickers indenter was performed; different cracking pattern was obtained for float soda-lime glass in comparison with Gorilla Glass®. In addition, the IQ2:IQ1 ratio as determined from Raman spectroscopy correlates with crack size from indentations.
published_date 2019-08-15T13:51:00Z
_version_ 1821413695273566208
score 11.247077

Similar Items