No Cover Image

Journal article 1362 views 258 downloads

Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis

Samuel Mann, David Blackaby, Nigel O’Leary, Nigel O'Leary Orcid Logo

Economics Letters, Volume: 181, Pages: 133 - 136

Swansea University Authors: David Blackaby, Nigel O'Leary Orcid Logo

  • 50056.pdf

    PDF | Accepted Manuscript

    Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND).

    Download (278.92KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.023

Abstract

The relationship between sexual identity and wellbeing is analysed in an unconditional panel quantile setting. There is heterogeneity across sexual identity and gender for homosexuals and, for all but lesbians, sexual minorities are less satisfied than heterosexuals below the median of the wellbeing...

Full description

Published in: Economics Letters
ISSN: 01651765
Published: 2019
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa50056
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2019-04-23T14:33:40Z
last_indexed 2019-07-23T21:34:39Z
id cronfa50056
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-07-23T15:23:53.3385752</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>50056</id><entry>2019-04-23</entry><title>Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>5b6a72a296cd534a451b536138325251</sid><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Blackaby</surname><name>David Blackaby</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>fb1a5569008b44e42a4c63a3f971bd29</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5971-9306</ORCID><firstname>Nigel</firstname><surname>O'Leary</surname><name>Nigel O'Leary</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-04-23</date><deptcode>SGMGT</deptcode><abstract>The relationship between sexual identity and wellbeing is analysed in an unconditional panel quantile setting. There is heterogeneity across sexual identity and gender for homosexuals and, for all but lesbians, sexual minorities are less satisfied than heterosexuals below the median of the wellbeing distribution. Meanwhile, bisexuals of any gender are the least satisfied of any sexual group, and this is apparent across the entire wellbeing distribution. In contrast, the happiest individuals who report an &#x2018;other&#x2019; sexual orientation are happier than the happiest heterosexuals.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Economics Letters</journal><volume>181</volume><paginationStart>133</paginationStart><paginationEnd>136</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>01651765</issnPrint><keywords>subjective wellbeing; sexual orientation; jittering; recentred influence function; quantile regression; correlated random effects</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>8</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2019</publishedYear><publishedDate>2019-08-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.023</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>School of Management - School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SGMGT</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-07-23T15:23:53.3385752</lastEdited><Created>2019-04-23T10:15:51.6250507</Created><authors><author><firstname>Samuel</firstname><surname>Mann</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Blackaby</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Nigel</firstname><surname>O&#x2019;Leary</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Nigel</firstname><surname>O'Leary</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5971-9306</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0050056-15052019110935.pdf</filename><originalFilename>50056.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-05-15T11:09:35.8930000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>262486</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2020-11-13T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-07-23T15:23:53.3385752 v2 50056 2019-04-23 Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis 5b6a72a296cd534a451b536138325251 David Blackaby David Blackaby true false fb1a5569008b44e42a4c63a3f971bd29 0000-0002-5971-9306 Nigel O'Leary Nigel O'Leary true false 2019-04-23 SGMGT The relationship between sexual identity and wellbeing is analysed in an unconditional panel quantile setting. There is heterogeneity across sexual identity and gender for homosexuals and, for all but lesbians, sexual minorities are less satisfied than heterosexuals below the median of the wellbeing distribution. Meanwhile, bisexuals of any gender are the least satisfied of any sexual group, and this is apparent across the entire wellbeing distribution. In contrast, the happiest individuals who report an ‘other’ sexual orientation are happier than the happiest heterosexuals. Journal Article Economics Letters 181 133 136 01651765 subjective wellbeing; sexual orientation; jittering; recentred influence function; quantile regression; correlated random effects 31 8 2019 2019-08-31 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.023 COLLEGE NANME School of Management - School COLLEGE CODE SGMGT Swansea University 2019-07-23T15:23:53.3385752 2019-04-23T10:15:51.6250507 Samuel Mann 1 David Blackaby 2 Nigel O’Leary 3 Nigel O'Leary 0000-0002-5971-9306 4 0050056-15052019110935.pdf 50056.pdf 2019-05-15T11:09:35.8930000 Output 262486 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2020-11-13T00:00:00.0000000 Released under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND). true eng
title Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis
spellingShingle Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis
David Blackaby
Nigel O'Leary
title_short Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis
title_full Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis
title_fullStr Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis
title_sort Sexual identity and wellbeing: A distributional analysis
author_id_str_mv 5b6a72a296cd534a451b536138325251
fb1a5569008b44e42a4c63a3f971bd29
author_id_fullname_str_mv 5b6a72a296cd534a451b536138325251_***_David Blackaby
fb1a5569008b44e42a4c63a3f971bd29_***_Nigel O'Leary
author David Blackaby
Nigel O'Leary
author2 Samuel Mann
David Blackaby
Nigel O’Leary
Nigel O'Leary
format Journal article
container_title Economics Letters
container_volume 181
container_start_page 133
publishDate 2019
institution Swansea University
issn 01651765
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.023
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description The relationship between sexual identity and wellbeing is analysed in an unconditional panel quantile setting. There is heterogeneity across sexual identity and gender for homosexuals and, for all but lesbians, sexual minorities are less satisfied than heterosexuals below the median of the wellbeing distribution. Meanwhile, bisexuals of any gender are the least satisfied of any sexual group, and this is apparent across the entire wellbeing distribution. In contrast, the happiest individuals who report an ‘other’ sexual orientation are happier than the happiest heterosexuals.
published_date 2019-08-31T04:01:21Z
_version_ 1763753151828066304
score 11.037253

Similar Items