No Cover Image

Journal article 1617 views 501 downloads

Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments

Rūta Liepiņa, Giovanni Sartor, Adam Wyner Orcid Logo

Artificial Intelligence and Law, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 69 - 89

Swansea University Author: Adam Wyner Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1007/s10506-019-09246-z

Abstract

In legal argumentation and liability attribution, disputes over causes play a central role. Legal discussions about causation often have difficulty with cause-in-fact in complex situations, e.g. overdetermination, preemption, omission. We first assess three theories of causation. Then we introduce a...

Full description

Published in: Artificial Intelligence and Law
ISSN: 0924-8463 1572-8382
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2020
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa49685
first_indexed 2019-03-21T13:59:26Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T14:25:56Z
id cronfa49685
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-09-28T16:48:00.3535885</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>49685</id><entry>2019-03-21</entry><title>Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>51fa34a3136b8e81fc273fce73e88099</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2958-3428</ORCID><firstname>Adam</firstname><surname>Wyner</surname><name>Adam Wyner</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-03-21</date><deptcode>MACS</deptcode><abstract>In legal argumentation and liability attribution, disputes over causes play a central role. Legal discussions about causation often have difficulty with cause-in-fact in complex situations, e.g. overdetermination, preemption, omission. We first assess three theories of causation. Then we introduce a semi-formal framework to model causal arguments using both strict and defeasible rules. We apply the framework to the Althen vaccine injury case. Wrapping up the paper, we motivate a causal argumentation framework and propose to integrate current theories of causation.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Artificial Intelligence and Law</journal><volume>28</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>69</paginationStart><paginationEnd>89</paginationEnd><publisher>Springer Science and Business Media LLC</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0924-8463</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1572-8382</issnElectronic><keywords>Artificial Intelligence, Legal Reasoning, Defeasible Reasoning</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2020</publishedYear><publishedDate>2020-03-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1007/s10506-019-09246-z</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09246-z</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Mathematics and Computer Science School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MACS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-09-28T16:48:00.3535885</lastEdited><Created>2019-03-21T10:45:19.5833024</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science</level></path><authors><author><firstname>R&#x16B;ta</firstname><surname>Liepi&#x146;a</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Giovanni</firstname><surname>Sartor</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Adam</firstname><surname>Wyner</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2958-3428</orcid><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0049685-16042019140814.pdf</filename><originalFilename>LiepinaSartorWynerArguingaboutCauses(2019).pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2019-04-16T14:08:14.1470000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>284814</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2020-03-05T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-09-28T16:48:00.3535885 v2 49685 2019-03-21 Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments 51fa34a3136b8e81fc273fce73e88099 0000-0002-2958-3428 Adam Wyner Adam Wyner true false 2019-03-21 MACS In legal argumentation and liability attribution, disputes over causes play a central role. Legal discussions about causation often have difficulty with cause-in-fact in complex situations, e.g. overdetermination, preemption, omission. We first assess three theories of causation. Then we introduce a semi-formal framework to model causal arguments using both strict and defeasible rules. We apply the framework to the Althen vaccine injury case. Wrapping up the paper, we motivate a causal argumentation framework and propose to integrate current theories of causation. Journal Article Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 1 69 89 Springer Science and Business Media LLC 0924-8463 1572-8382 Artificial Intelligence, Legal Reasoning, Defeasible Reasoning 1 3 2020 2020-03-01 10.1007/s10506-019-09246-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09246-z COLLEGE NANME Mathematics and Computer Science School COLLEGE CODE MACS Swansea University 2022-09-28T16:48:00.3535885 2019-03-21T10:45:19.5833024 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science Rūta Liepiņa 1 Giovanni Sartor 2 Adam Wyner 0000-0002-2958-3428 3 0049685-16042019140814.pdf LiepinaSartorWynerArguingaboutCauses(2019).pdf 2019-04-16T14:08:14.1470000 Output 284814 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2020-03-05T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments
spellingShingle Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments
Adam Wyner
title_short Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments
title_full Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments
title_fullStr Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments
title_full_unstemmed Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments
title_sort Arguing about causes in law: a semi-formal framework for causal arguments
author_id_str_mv 51fa34a3136b8e81fc273fce73e88099
author_id_fullname_str_mv 51fa34a3136b8e81fc273fce73e88099_***_Adam Wyner
author Adam Wyner
author2 Rūta Liepiņa
Giovanni Sartor
Adam Wyner
format Journal article
container_title Artificial Intelligence and Law
container_volume 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
publishDate 2020
institution Swansea University
issn 0924-8463
1572-8382
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10506-019-09246-z
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09246-z
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description In legal argumentation and liability attribution, disputes over causes play a central role. Legal discussions about causation often have difficulty with cause-in-fact in complex situations, e.g. overdetermination, preemption, omission. We first assess three theories of causation. Then we introduce a semi-formal framework to model causal arguments using both strict and defeasible rules. We apply the framework to the Althen vaccine injury case. Wrapping up the paper, we motivate a causal argumentation framework and propose to integrate current theories of causation.
published_date 2020-03-01T04:37:28Z
_version_ 1851094674434949120
score 11.089386

Similar Items