Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.

Blagrove, Mark; Edwards, Chris; Rijn, Elaine van; Reid, Alex; Malinowski, Josie; Bennett, Paul; Carr, Michelle; Eichenlaub, Jean-Baptiste; McGee, Shauna; Evans, Katie; Ruby, Perrine

doi:10.1037/cns0000167

Journal article 1687 views 258 downloads

Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.

Mark Blagrove

, Chris Edwards, Elaine van Rijn, Alex Reid, Josie Malinowski, Paul Bennett, Michelle Carr, Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub, Shauna McGee, Katie Evans, Perrine Ruby

Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, Volume: 6, Pages: 138 - 162

Swansea University Authors: Mark Blagrove , Paul Bennett

PDF | Version of Record

Article made freely available. The author has paid a fee to the publisher which permits circulation of the article in this institutional repository. Articles are published under the APA copyright.
Download (303.55KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1037/cns0000167

Abstract

Throughout history, there have been reports and claims that consideration of dreams can produce personal realizations and insight. We assessed Exploration–Insight scores associated with discussing REM and non-REM dreams in connection with recent waking life experiences. Thirty-one participants were...

Full description

Published in:	Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice
ISSN:	2326-5523 2326-5531
Published:	2019
Online Access:	Check full text
URI:	https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa48251
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

first_indexed	2019-01-15T20:00:04Z
last_indexed	2020-12-10T04:00:47Z
id	cronfa48251
recordtype	SURis
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><datestamp>2020-12-09T10:02:04.6432287</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>48251</id><entry>2019-01-15</entry><title>Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8c78ee008e650b9f0a463bae56a5636c</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-9854-1854</ORCID><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Blagrove</surname><name>Mark Blagrove</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>20803717bf274c582f30f80916c596d3</sid><firstname>Paul</firstname><surname>Bennett</surname><name>Paul Bennett</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2019-01-15</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Throughout history, there have been reports and claims that consideration of dreams can produce personal realizations and insight. We assessed Exploration–Insight scores associated with discussing REM and non-REM dreams in connection with recent waking life experiences. Thirty-one participants were cued in the sleep laboratory for a daydream report and then awakened from REM and N2 sleep for dream reports. Participants subsequently discussed each of their dream and daydream reports for 30–40 min with two experimenters, following the structured Ullman (1996) dream group discussion procedure. Participants assessed the benefit of discussing the reports by completing the Gains from (Day)Dream Interpretation (G[D]DI) questionnaire. We found no difference in G(D)DI scores between discussing REM and N2 dream reports, and no difference between dream and daydream discussions in engagement and thoroughness of exploring the reports. However, discussing dream reports produced higher scores on the G(D)DI Exploration–Insight subscale compared with discussing daydream reports. Significant differences were evident in items reflecting the learning of what the report means in terms of waking life issues. Frontal theta prior to waking from N2 was significantly associated with Exploration–Insight score obtained after N2 dream discussion, but this relationship was not found for REM dreams. The findings of high ratings of Exploration–Insight after discussing dreams were evident even though participants did not select the dream, unlike what can occur for home recorded dreams, and even though discussion was brief. We suggest that insight might be produced by embodied and metaphorical thinking in dreams.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice</journal><volume>6</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>138</paginationStart><paginationEnd>162</paginationEnd><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2326-5523</issnPrint><issnElectronic>2326-5531</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2019</publishedYear><publishedDate>2019-06-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1037/cns0000167</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>CHHS Swansea University</funders><lastEdited>2020-12-09T10:02:04.6432287</lastEdited><Created>2019-01-15T15:59:25.9273825</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Blagrove</surname><orcid>0000-0002-9854-1854</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Chris</firstname><surname>Edwards</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Elaine van</firstname><surname>Rijn</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Alex</firstname><surname>Reid</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Josie</firstname><surname>Malinowski</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Paul</firstname><surname>Bennett</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Michelle</firstname><surname>Carr</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Jean-Baptiste</firstname><surname>Eichenlaub</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Shauna</firstname><surname>McGee</surname><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Katie</firstname><surname>Evans</surname><order>10</order></author><author><firstname>Perrine</firstname><surname>Ruby</surname><order>11</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>48251__17142__f56243a295374ccca53842334ae74c78.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Blagrove VOR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2020-04-28T16:37:13.3152019</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>310835</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Article made freely available. The author has paid a fee to the publisher which permits circulation of the article in this institutional repository. Articles are published under the APA copyright.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs><OutputDur><Id>23</Id><IsDataAvailableOnline>true</IsDataAvailableOnline><DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurUrl>http://supp.apa.org/psycarticles/supplemental/cns0000167/cns0000167_supp.html</DurUrl><IsDurRestrictions>true</IsDurRestrictions><DurRestrictionReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurEmbargoDate xsi:nil="true"/></OutputDur></OutputDurs></rfc1807>
spelling	2020-12-09T10:02:04.6432287 v2 48251 2019-01-15 Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams. 8c78ee008e650b9f0a463bae56a5636c 0000-0002-9854-1854 Mark Blagrove Mark Blagrove true false 20803717bf274c582f30f80916c596d3 Paul Bennett Paul Bennett true false 2019-01-15 HPS Throughout history, there have been reports and claims that consideration of dreams can produce personal realizations and insight. We assessed Exploration–Insight scores associated with discussing REM and non-REM dreams in connection with recent waking life experiences. Thirty-one participants were cued in the sleep laboratory for a daydream report and then awakened from REM and N2 sleep for dream reports. Participants subsequently discussed each of their dream and daydream reports for 30–40 min with two experimenters, following the structured Ullman (1996) dream group discussion procedure. Participants assessed the benefit of discussing the reports by completing the Gains from (Day)Dream Interpretation (G[D]DI) questionnaire. We found no difference in G(D)DI scores between discussing REM and N2 dream reports, and no difference between dream and daydream discussions in engagement and thoroughness of exploring the reports. However, discussing dream reports produced higher scores on the G(D)DI Exploration–Insight subscale compared with discussing daydream reports. Significant differences were evident in items reflecting the learning of what the report means in terms of waking life issues. Frontal theta prior to waking from N2 was significantly associated with Exploration–Insight score obtained after N2 dream discussion, but this relationship was not found for REM dreams. The findings of high ratings of Exploration–Insight after discussing dreams were evident even though participants did not select the dream, unlike what can occur for home recorded dreams, and even though discussion was brief. We suggest that insight might be produced by embodied and metaphorical thinking in dreams. Journal Article Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 138 162 2326-5523 2326-5531 1 6 2019 2019-06-01 10.1037/cns0000167 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University CHHS Swansea University 2020-12-09T10:02:04.6432287 2019-01-15T15:59:25.9273825 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Mark Blagrove 0000-0002-9854-1854 1 Chris Edwards 2 Elaine van Rijn 3 Alex Reid 4 Josie Malinowski 5 Paul Bennett 6 Michelle Carr 7 Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub 8 Shauna McGee 9 Katie Evans 10 Perrine Ruby 11 48251__17142__f56243a295374ccca53842334ae74c78.pdf Blagrove VOR.pdf 2020-04-28T16:37:13.3152019 Output 310835 application/pdf Version of Record true Article made freely available. The author has paid a fee to the publisher which permits circulation of the article in this institutional repository. Articles are published under the APA copyright. true eng 23 true http://supp.apa.org/psycarticles/supplemental/cns0000167/cns0000167_supp.html true
title	Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.
spellingShingle	Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams. Mark Blagrove Paul Bennett
title_short	Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.
title_full	Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.
title_fullStr	Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.
title_full_unstemmed	Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.
title_sort	Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.
author_id_str_mv	8c78ee008e650b9f0a463bae56a5636c 20803717bf274c582f30f80916c596d3
author_id_fullname_str_mv	8c78ee008e650b9f0a463bae56a5636c_*_Mark Blagrove 20803717bf274c582f30f80916c596d3_*_Paul Bennett
author	Mark Blagrove Paul Bennett
author2	Mark Blagrove Chris Edwards Elaine van Rijn Alex Reid Josie Malinowski Paul Bennett Michelle Carr Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub Shauna McGee Katie Evans Perrine Ruby
format	Journal article
container_title	Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice
container_volume	6
container_start_page	138
publishDate	2019
institution	Swansea University
issn	2326-5523 2326-5531
doi_str_mv	10.1037/cns0000167
college_str	Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id	facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title	Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title	Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str	School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str	1
active_str	0
description	Throughout history, there have been reports and claims that consideration of dreams can produce personal realizations and insight. We assessed Exploration–Insight scores associated with discussing REM and non-REM dreams in connection with recent waking life experiences. Thirty-one participants were cued in the sleep laboratory for a daydream report and then awakened from REM and N2 sleep for dream reports. Participants subsequently discussed each of their dream and daydream reports for 30–40 min with two experimenters, following the structured Ullman (1996) dream group discussion procedure. Participants assessed the benefit of discussing the reports by completing the Gains from (Day)Dream Interpretation (G[D]DI) questionnaire. We found no difference in G(D)DI scores between discussing REM and N2 dream reports, and no difference between dream and daydream discussions in engagement and thoroughness of exploring the reports. However, discussing dream reports produced higher scores on the G(D)DI Exploration–Insight subscale compared with discussing daydream reports. Significant differences were evident in items reflecting the learning of what the report means in terms of waking life issues. Frontal theta prior to waking from N2 was significantly associated with Exploration–Insight score obtained after N2 dream discussion, but this relationship was not found for REM dreams. The findings of high ratings of Exploration–Insight after discussing dreams were evident even though participants did not select the dream, unlike what can occur for home recorded dreams, and even though discussion was brief. We suggest that insight might be produced by embodied and metaphorical thinking in dreams.
published_date	2019-06-01T03:58:37Z
_version_	1763752979692781568
score	11.037603

Insight from the consideration of REM dreams, non-REM dreams, and daydreams.

Similar Items