No Cover Image

Journal article 1286 views 700 downloads

Understanding the track and field sprint start through a functional analysis of the external force features which contribute to higher levels of block phase performance

Neil Bezodis Orcid Logo, Sean Walton Orcid Logo, Ryu Nagahara

Journal of Sports Sciences, Volume: 37, Issue: 5, Pages: 560 - 567

Swansea University Authors: Neil Bezodis Orcid Logo, Sean Walton Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/02640414.2018.1521713

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the continuous ground reaction force (GRF) features which contribute to higher levels of block phase performance. Twenty-three sprint-trained athletes completed starts from their preferred settings during which GRFs were recorded separately under each block. Continuous f...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Sports Sciences
ISSN: 0264-0414 1466-447X
Published: 2019
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa43730
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: This study aimed to identify the continuous ground reaction force (GRF) features which contribute to higher levels of block phase performance. Twenty-three sprint-trained athletes completed starts from their preferred settings during which GRFs were recorded separately under each block. Continuous features of the magnitude and direction of the resultant GRF signals which explained 90% of the variation between the sprinters were identified. Each sprinter’s coefficient score for these continuous features was then input to a linear regression model to predict block phase performance (normalised external power). Four significant (p < 0.05) predictor features associated with GRF magnitude were identified; there were none associated with GRF direction. A feature associated with greater rear block GRF magnitudes from the onset of the push was the most important predictor (β = 1.185), followed by greater front block GRF magnitudes for the final three-quarters of the push (β = 0.791). Features which included a later rear block exit (β = 0.254) and greater front leg GRF magnitudes during the mid-push phase (β = 0.224) were also significant predictors. Sprint practitioners are encouraged, where possible, to consider the continuous magnitude of the GRFs produced throughout the block phase in addition to selected discrete values.
College: Faculty of Science and Engineering
Issue: 5
Start Page: 560
End Page: 567

Similar Items