E-Thesis 713 views 443 downloads
The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. / G. Elaine Goldup
Swansea University Author: G. Elaine Goldup
-
PDF | E-Thesis
Download (6.4MB)
Abstract
This thesis examines aspects of the 'Irish Question' and its impact on British politics predominantly between 1880 - 1914, with special reference to its implications for the character of the British Constitution, and its efficacy when applied to a divided society. It analyses the conceptua...
Published: |
2002
|
---|---|
Institution: | Swansea University |
Degree level: | Master of Philosophy |
Degree name: | M.Phil |
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42719 |
first_indexed |
2018-08-02T18:55:23Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2019-10-21T16:48:20Z |
id |
cronfa42719 |
recordtype |
RisThesis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-08-16T14:39:02.9105634</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>42719</id><entry>2018-08-02</entry><title>The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914.</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>27e46a43096112054a83cb0977010bba</sid><ORCID>NULL</ORCID><firstname>G. Elaine</firstname><surname>Goldup</surname><name>G. Elaine Goldup</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>true</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-08-02</date><abstract>This thesis examines aspects of the 'Irish Question' and its impact on British politics predominantly between 1880 - 1914, with special reference to its implications for the character of the British Constitution, and its efficacy when applied to a divided society. It analyses the conceptual ideas of the major political actors and how these were formulated and adapted to meet particular circumstances. It is divided into five Chapters: 1. Outlines the historical background from the beginning of the seventeenth century to the granting of Catholic Emancipation in 1828. It sets out the makings of a divided society, with particular attention to the plantation of Ulster 2. Examines the arguments for and against the granting of Home Rule during the time of the first and second Home Rule Bills of 1886 and 1893, assessing the strategies used by both the Irish Parties to attain what each perceived to be justice for Ireland. It looks at how successful Gladstone's Governments were at accommodating these two different perceptions of justice. 3. Discusses the evolutionary changes of the British Constitution, with particular attention to the 1911 Parliament Act, examining the Unionists' claim, that the passing of this Act was part of a 'corrupt parliamentary bargain' between the Liberal Government and the Irish Parliamentary Party. 4. Examines A V Dicey's argument that the passing of a Home Rule Bill by virtue of the 1911 Parliament Act would lack constitutional validity, since there were reasonable grounds to suspect that the House of Commons did not represent the determined will of the nation. Hence, the Liberals were usurping the Sovereignty of the people. 5. Assesses Dicey's arguments within the context of the 'Ulster Crisis' 1912-1914, and explores the argument that the passing of Home Rule by virtue of the 1911 Parliament Act would exceed the bounds of legitimate government authority.</abstract><type>E-Thesis</type><journal/><journalNumber></journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Political science.;International relations.;European history.</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2002</publishedYear><publishedDate>2002-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Political and Cultural Studies</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><degreelevel>Master of Philosophy</degreelevel><degreename>M.Phil</degreename><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-08-16T14:39:02.9105634</lastEdited><Created>2018-08-02T16:24:30.2270047</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>G. Elaine</firstname><surname>Goldup</surname><orcid>NULL</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0042719-02082018162516.pdf</filename><originalFilename>10807488.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2018-08-02T16:25:16.6370000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>6607435</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>E-Thesis</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2018-08-02T16:25:16.6370000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2018-08-16T14:39:02.9105634 v2 42719 2018-08-02 The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. 27e46a43096112054a83cb0977010bba NULL G. Elaine Goldup G. Elaine Goldup true true 2018-08-02 This thesis examines aspects of the 'Irish Question' and its impact on British politics predominantly between 1880 - 1914, with special reference to its implications for the character of the British Constitution, and its efficacy when applied to a divided society. It analyses the conceptual ideas of the major political actors and how these were formulated and adapted to meet particular circumstances. It is divided into five Chapters: 1. Outlines the historical background from the beginning of the seventeenth century to the granting of Catholic Emancipation in 1828. It sets out the makings of a divided society, with particular attention to the plantation of Ulster 2. Examines the arguments for and against the granting of Home Rule during the time of the first and second Home Rule Bills of 1886 and 1893, assessing the strategies used by both the Irish Parties to attain what each perceived to be justice for Ireland. It looks at how successful Gladstone's Governments were at accommodating these two different perceptions of justice. 3. Discusses the evolutionary changes of the British Constitution, with particular attention to the 1911 Parliament Act, examining the Unionists' claim, that the passing of this Act was part of a 'corrupt parliamentary bargain' between the Liberal Government and the Irish Parliamentary Party. 4. Examines A V Dicey's argument that the passing of a Home Rule Bill by virtue of the 1911 Parliament Act would lack constitutional validity, since there were reasonable grounds to suspect that the House of Commons did not represent the determined will of the nation. Hence, the Liberals were usurping the Sovereignty of the people. 5. Assesses Dicey's arguments within the context of the 'Ulster Crisis' 1912-1914, and explores the argument that the passing of Home Rule by virtue of the 1911 Parliament Act would exceed the bounds of legitimate government authority. E-Thesis Political science.;International relations.;European history. 31 12 2002 2002-12-31 COLLEGE NANME Political and Cultural Studies COLLEGE CODE Swansea University Master of Philosophy M.Phil 2018-08-16T14:39:02.9105634 2018-08-02T16:24:30.2270047 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations G. Elaine Goldup NULL 1 0042719-02082018162516.pdf 10807488.pdf 2018-08-02T16:25:16.6370000 Output 6607435 application/pdf E-Thesis true 2018-08-02T16:25:16.6370000 false |
title |
The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. |
spellingShingle |
The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. G. Elaine Goldup |
title_short |
The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. |
title_full |
The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. |
title_fullStr |
The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. |
title_sort |
The implications of Irish Home Rule for the British Constitution 1880-1914. |
author_id_str_mv |
27e46a43096112054a83cb0977010bba |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
27e46a43096112054a83cb0977010bba_***_G. Elaine Goldup |
author |
G. Elaine Goldup |
author2 |
G. Elaine Goldup |
format |
E-Thesis |
publishDate |
2002 |
institution |
Swansea University |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This thesis examines aspects of the 'Irish Question' and its impact on British politics predominantly between 1880 - 1914, with special reference to its implications for the character of the British Constitution, and its efficacy when applied to a divided society. It analyses the conceptual ideas of the major political actors and how these were formulated and adapted to meet particular circumstances. It is divided into five Chapters: 1. Outlines the historical background from the beginning of the seventeenth century to the granting of Catholic Emancipation in 1828. It sets out the makings of a divided society, with particular attention to the plantation of Ulster 2. Examines the arguments for and against the granting of Home Rule during the time of the first and second Home Rule Bills of 1886 and 1893, assessing the strategies used by both the Irish Parties to attain what each perceived to be justice for Ireland. It looks at how successful Gladstone's Governments were at accommodating these two different perceptions of justice. 3. Discusses the evolutionary changes of the British Constitution, with particular attention to the 1911 Parliament Act, examining the Unionists' claim, that the passing of this Act was part of a 'corrupt parliamentary bargain' between the Liberal Government and the Irish Parliamentary Party. 4. Examines A V Dicey's argument that the passing of a Home Rule Bill by virtue of the 1911 Parliament Act would lack constitutional validity, since there were reasonable grounds to suspect that the House of Commons did not represent the determined will of the nation. Hence, the Liberals were usurping the Sovereignty of the people. 5. Assesses Dicey's arguments within the context of the 'Ulster Crisis' 1912-1914, and explores the argument that the passing of Home Rule by virtue of the 1911 Parliament Act would exceed the bounds of legitimate government authority. |
published_date |
2002-12-31T07:20:55Z |
_version_ |
1829539105561640960 |
score |
11.058181 |