No Cover Image

E-Thesis 329 views 110 downloads

Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse. / Kirstan Hawkins

Swansea University Author: Kirstan Hawkins

Abstract

"This thesis is a critique of the global reproductive health and rights and discourse, which emanated from the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development. The thesis argues that far from being a new population policy paradigm, the reproductive rights and health discourse is a r...

Full description

Published: 2002
Institution: Swansea University
Degree level: Doctoral
Degree name: Ph.D
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42673
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2018-08-02T18:55:16Z
last_indexed 2018-08-03T10:10:46Z
id cronfa42673
recordtype RisThesis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-08-02T16:24:30.0709999</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>42673</id><entry>2018-08-02</entry><title>Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse.</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>d0605993cb6063dab279cb69891e1798</sid><ORCID>NULL</ORCID><firstname>Kirstan</firstname><surname>Hawkins</surname><name>Kirstan Hawkins</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>true</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-08-02</date><abstract>"This thesis is a critique of the global reproductive health and rights and discourse, which emanated from the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development. The thesis argues that far from being a new population policy paradigm, the reproductive rights and health discourse is a reworking of a neo-Malthusian and neo-liberal policy agenda. The thesis begins with a consideration of the historical and political context in which international population policy has evolved, and questions the extent to which liberal notions of individual rights freedom and choice, enshrined in the reproductive health discourse, bears a relationship to the social, political and economic realities in which poor and socially marginalized people experience their sexual and reproductive health. Through a critical review of the literature the thesis questions the positivist/functionalist paradigms upon which mainstream demographic and reproductive health research is based. In rejecting both the positivism of mainstream demography as well as the relativism of much post-modernism, the thesis draws eclectically upon post-structuralist and practice theory to suggest a framework for "critical social analysis", which understands sexual and reproductive behaviour as both historically grounded and culturally contingent. Central to the framework is an exploration of how constructions of identity and difference shape social and political practice at the national and local level. Drawing upon case study material from Bolivia, the thesis explores how constructions of identity and difference are embedded in historical and structural conditions of inequality and exploitation. Through an ethnographic study the thesis considers how these structural conditions of inequality become embodied in and reproduced through everyday practices, which ultimately shape the experience of health and well being among poor migrant women. The thesis goes on to suggest a methodological approach entitled the "peer ethnographic method" for incorporating such an understanding of identity and difference into programme design and monitoring."</abstract><type>E-Thesis</type><journal/><journalNumber></journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Social structure.;Public policy.</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2002</publishedYear><publishedDate>2002-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Public Health and Policy Studies</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><degreelevel>Doctoral</degreelevel><degreename>Ph.D</degreename><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-08-02T16:24:30.0709999</lastEdited><Created>2018-08-02T16:24:30.0709999</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Health and Social Care - Public Health</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Kirstan</firstname><surname>Hawkins</surname><orcid>NULL</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0042673-02082018162513.pdf</filename><originalFilename>10807442.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2018-08-02T16:25:13.0030000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>6943148</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>E-Thesis</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2018-08-02T16:25:13.0030000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2018-08-02T16:24:30.0709999 v2 42673 2018-08-02 Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse. d0605993cb6063dab279cb69891e1798 NULL Kirstan Hawkins Kirstan Hawkins true true 2018-08-02 "This thesis is a critique of the global reproductive health and rights and discourse, which emanated from the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development. The thesis argues that far from being a new population policy paradigm, the reproductive rights and health discourse is a reworking of a neo-Malthusian and neo-liberal policy agenda. The thesis begins with a consideration of the historical and political context in which international population policy has evolved, and questions the extent to which liberal notions of individual rights freedom and choice, enshrined in the reproductive health discourse, bears a relationship to the social, political and economic realities in which poor and socially marginalized people experience their sexual and reproductive health. Through a critical review of the literature the thesis questions the positivist/functionalist paradigms upon which mainstream demographic and reproductive health research is based. In rejecting both the positivism of mainstream demography as well as the relativism of much post-modernism, the thesis draws eclectically upon post-structuralist and practice theory to suggest a framework for "critical social analysis", which understands sexual and reproductive behaviour as both historically grounded and culturally contingent. Central to the framework is an exploration of how constructions of identity and difference shape social and political practice at the national and local level. Drawing upon case study material from Bolivia, the thesis explores how constructions of identity and difference are embedded in historical and structural conditions of inequality and exploitation. Through an ethnographic study the thesis considers how these structural conditions of inequality become embodied in and reproduced through everyday practices, which ultimately shape the experience of health and well being among poor migrant women. The thesis goes on to suggest a methodological approach entitled the "peer ethnographic method" for incorporating such an understanding of identity and difference into programme design and monitoring." E-Thesis Social structure.;Public policy. 31 12 2002 2002-12-31 COLLEGE NANME Public Health and Policy Studies COLLEGE CODE Swansea University Doctoral Ph.D 2018-08-02T16:24:30.0709999 2018-08-02T16:24:30.0709999 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Health and Social Care - Public Health Kirstan Hawkins NULL 1 0042673-02082018162513.pdf 10807442.pdf 2018-08-02T16:25:13.0030000 Output 6943148 application/pdf E-Thesis true 2018-08-02T16:25:13.0030000 false
title Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse.
spellingShingle Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse.
Kirstan Hawkins
title_short Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse.
title_full Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse.
title_fullStr Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse.
title_full_unstemmed Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse.
title_sort Rights, health and power: A critical social analysis of the reproductive health and rights discourse.
author_id_str_mv d0605993cb6063dab279cb69891e1798
author_id_fullname_str_mv d0605993cb6063dab279cb69891e1798_***_Kirstan Hawkins
author Kirstan Hawkins
author2 Kirstan Hawkins
format E-Thesis
publishDate 2002
institution Swansea University
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Health and Social Care - Public Health{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Health and Social Care - Public Health
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description "This thesis is a critique of the global reproductive health and rights and discourse, which emanated from the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development. The thesis argues that far from being a new population policy paradigm, the reproductive rights and health discourse is a reworking of a neo-Malthusian and neo-liberal policy agenda. The thesis begins with a consideration of the historical and political context in which international population policy has evolved, and questions the extent to which liberal notions of individual rights freedom and choice, enshrined in the reproductive health discourse, bears a relationship to the social, political and economic realities in which poor and socially marginalized people experience their sexual and reproductive health. Through a critical review of the literature the thesis questions the positivist/functionalist paradigms upon which mainstream demographic and reproductive health research is based. In rejecting both the positivism of mainstream demography as well as the relativism of much post-modernism, the thesis draws eclectically upon post-structuralist and practice theory to suggest a framework for "critical social analysis", which understands sexual and reproductive behaviour as both historically grounded and culturally contingent. Central to the framework is an exploration of how constructions of identity and difference shape social and political practice at the national and local level. Drawing upon case study material from Bolivia, the thesis explores how constructions of identity and difference are embedded in historical and structural conditions of inequality and exploitation. Through an ethnographic study the thesis considers how these structural conditions of inequality become embodied in and reproduced through everyday practices, which ultimately shape the experience of health and well being among poor migrant women. The thesis goes on to suggest a methodological approach entitled the "peer ethnographic method" for incorporating such an understanding of identity and difference into programme design and monitoring."
published_date 2002-12-31T03:53:25Z
_version_ 1763752653207109632
score 11.013148

Similar Items