E-Thesis 417 views 212 downloads
An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. / Melanie Kim Jones
Swansea University Author: Melanie Kim Jones
-
PDF | E-Thesis
Download (9.39MB)
Abstract
This thesis uses data from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and the Health Survey for England (HSE) to examine the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. The analysis documents the extent of, and examines the reasons for, the gap in employment and earnings between disability groups....
Published: |
2007
|
---|---|
Institution: | Swansea University |
Degree level: | Doctoral |
Degree name: | Ph.D |
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42485 |
first_indexed |
2018-08-02T18:54:49Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-08-03T10:10:16Z |
id |
cronfa42485 |
recordtype |
RisThesis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-08-02T16:24:29.4157931</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>42485</id><entry>2018-08-02</entry><title>An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK.</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>5f46bd612399cc42ddb59233b35761ef</sid><ORCID>NULL</ORCID><firstname>Melanie Kim</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><name>Melanie Kim Jones</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>true</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-08-02</date><abstract>This thesis uses data from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and the Health Survey for England (HSE) to examine the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. The analysis documents the extent of, and examines the reasons for, the gap in employment and earnings between disability groups. In particular, it attempts to separate the effects of observable differences in characteristics, unobserved productivity differences and discrimination. Unobserved productivity differences are found to be an important influence on employment and earnings. As such, the existing evidence, which ignores this influence, overestimates discrimination against the disabled. Relative to the non-disabled, disabled workers are concentrated in part-time and self- employment. The analysis examines if this concentration is due to marginalisation of the disabled, or if disabled workers have different preferences for non-standard work driven by the need to accommodate disability. The concentration of the disabled in part-time employment is found to be predominately driven by differences in preferences. Amongst males, preferences are also an important explanation for the concentration in self-employment. Estimates of the impact of self-reported disability on labour market outcomes have been criticised due to the potential influence of measurement error and justification bias. The analysis uses more objective health information in the HSE to instrument self-reported disability in a labour market participation model. Self-reported information is found to underestimate the impact of disability, which suggests measurement error is important. The employment provisions in the 1995 Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) were intended to improve the labour market outcomes of the disabled. Data from the LFS indicate that, after controlling for characteristics, the employment gap between the disabled and non-disabled narrowed in the post-DDA period. In contrast, analysis based on a difference in difference procedure and data from the HSE (1991-2004) does not support a positive influence of the legislation.</abstract><type>E-Thesis</type><journal/><journalNumber></journalNumber><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Labor economics.;Labor relations.;Disability studies.</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2007</publishedYear><publishedDate>2007-12-31</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Economics</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><degreelevel>Doctoral</degreelevel><degreename>Ph.D</degreename><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-08-02T16:24:29.4157931</lastEdited><Created>2018-08-02T16:24:29.4157931</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Economics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Melanie Kim</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><orcid>NULL</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0042485-02082018162458.pdf</filename><originalFilename>10801715.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2018-08-02T16:24:58.2130000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>9732868</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>E-Thesis</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2018-08-02T16:24:58.2130000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2018-08-02T16:24:29.4157931 v2 42485 2018-08-02 An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. 5f46bd612399cc42ddb59233b35761ef NULL Melanie Kim Jones Melanie Kim Jones true true 2018-08-02 This thesis uses data from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and the Health Survey for England (HSE) to examine the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. The analysis documents the extent of, and examines the reasons for, the gap in employment and earnings between disability groups. In particular, it attempts to separate the effects of observable differences in characteristics, unobserved productivity differences and discrimination. Unobserved productivity differences are found to be an important influence on employment and earnings. As such, the existing evidence, which ignores this influence, overestimates discrimination against the disabled. Relative to the non-disabled, disabled workers are concentrated in part-time and self- employment. The analysis examines if this concentration is due to marginalisation of the disabled, or if disabled workers have different preferences for non-standard work driven by the need to accommodate disability. The concentration of the disabled in part-time employment is found to be predominately driven by differences in preferences. Amongst males, preferences are also an important explanation for the concentration in self-employment. Estimates of the impact of self-reported disability on labour market outcomes have been criticised due to the potential influence of measurement error and justification bias. The analysis uses more objective health information in the HSE to instrument self-reported disability in a labour market participation model. Self-reported information is found to underestimate the impact of disability, which suggests measurement error is important. The employment provisions in the 1995 Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) were intended to improve the labour market outcomes of the disabled. Data from the LFS indicate that, after controlling for characteristics, the employment gap between the disabled and non-disabled narrowed in the post-DDA period. In contrast, analysis based on a difference in difference procedure and data from the HSE (1991-2004) does not support a positive influence of the legislation. E-Thesis Labor economics.;Labor relations.;Disability studies. 31 12 2007 2007-12-31 COLLEGE NANME Economics COLLEGE CODE Swansea University Doctoral Ph.D 2018-08-02T16:24:29.4157931 2018-08-02T16:24:29.4157931 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Economics Melanie Kim Jones NULL 1 0042485-02082018162458.pdf 10801715.pdf 2018-08-02T16:24:58.2130000 Output 9732868 application/pdf E-Thesis true 2018-08-02T16:24:58.2130000 false |
title |
An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. |
spellingShingle |
An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. Melanie Kim Jones |
title_short |
An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. |
title_full |
An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. |
title_fullStr |
An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. |
title_full_unstemmed |
An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. |
title_sort |
An investigation into the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. |
author_id_str_mv |
5f46bd612399cc42ddb59233b35761ef |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
5f46bd612399cc42ddb59233b35761ef_***_Melanie Kim Jones |
author |
Melanie Kim Jones |
author2 |
Melanie Kim Jones |
format |
E-Thesis |
publishDate |
2007 |
institution |
Swansea University |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
School of Management - Economics{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Economics |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
This thesis uses data from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and the Health Survey for England (HSE) to examine the impact of disability on labour market outcomes in the UK. The analysis documents the extent of, and examines the reasons for, the gap in employment and earnings between disability groups. In particular, it attempts to separate the effects of observable differences in characteristics, unobserved productivity differences and discrimination. Unobserved productivity differences are found to be an important influence on employment and earnings. As such, the existing evidence, which ignores this influence, overestimates discrimination against the disabled. Relative to the non-disabled, disabled workers are concentrated in part-time and self- employment. The analysis examines if this concentration is due to marginalisation of the disabled, or if disabled workers have different preferences for non-standard work driven by the need to accommodate disability. The concentration of the disabled in part-time employment is found to be predominately driven by differences in preferences. Amongst males, preferences are also an important explanation for the concentration in self-employment. Estimates of the impact of self-reported disability on labour market outcomes have been criticised due to the potential influence of measurement error and justification bias. The analysis uses more objective health information in the HSE to instrument self-reported disability in a labour market participation model. Self-reported information is found to underestimate the impact of disability, which suggests measurement error is important. The employment provisions in the 1995 Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) were intended to improve the labour market outcomes of the disabled. Data from the LFS indicate that, after controlling for characteristics, the employment gap between the disabled and non-disabled narrowed in the post-DDA period. In contrast, analysis based on a difference in difference procedure and data from the HSE (1991-2004) does not support a positive influence of the legislation. |
published_date |
2007-12-31T04:32:16Z |
_version_ |
1821378542578958336 |
score |
11.04748 |