Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 875 views
Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices
26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference
Swansea University Author: Llion Evans
Abstract
Plasma exhaust is a critical aspect of DEMO-class devices, so there needs to be confidence that it will work. This paper considers the methodology to establish confidence in potential solutions, drawing on approaches inside and outside fusion, including evolving high power computing tools – these ap...
Published in: | 26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference |
---|---|
Published: |
Kyoto, Japan
IAEA FEC 2016
2016
|
Online Access: |
https://conferences.iaea.org/indico/event/98/session/31/contribution/521 |
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa39997 |
first_indexed |
2018-05-08T13:53:14Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-05-15T12:35:45Z |
id |
cronfa39997 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-05-15T12:03:44.9752883</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>39997</id><entry>2018-05-08</entry><title>Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>74dc5084c47484922a6e0135ebcb9402</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-4964-4187</ORCID><firstname>Llion</firstname><surname>Evans</surname><name>Llion Evans</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2018-05-08</date><deptcode>ACEM</deptcode><abstract>Plasma exhaust is a critical aspect of DEMO-class devices, so there needs to be confidence that it will work. This paper considers the methodology to establish confidence in potential solutions, drawing on approaches inside and outside fusion, including evolving high power computing tools – these approaches could also help find improved solutions, , possibly where all the plasma and materials ingredients operate in known regimes, reducing uncertainty. Crucially, the elements need to be integrated into an overall solution that can meet the demanding performance requirements and constraints of a fusion plant yet also accommodate significant uncertainties in plasma, materials and component behaviour.A prior full scale test of a DEMO exhaust solution is not feasible, almost by definition. The reference approach is to take the best available design, with various uncertainties and unknowns, and use margins and risk mitigation tools to address these. We explore a complementary approach based on models for the final step to give more confidence in the performance and uncertainty range of the design. The two approaches could be combined.For the plasma aspects, qualification will be eased if solutions have resilience to uncertainties and variations, ideally with natural “springiness”, or damping of transients. These can be tested with integrated models containing all relevant mechanisms and interactions, suitably validated.Materials and components have comparable modelling and integration challenges, in particular predicting the effects of combined loads (e.g. neutron, thermal, mechanical). A possible strategy is to combine measured and predicted materials properties and failure mechanisms (such as crack propagation, deformation) into a hierarchical multiscale model from atom-scale up. Such a modelling workflow would be well suited to high levels of parallelisation and would improve over use of average material properties.In-silico qualification of such a large and complex system is very challenging, but has large potential benefits in cost, time, flexibility and optimisation. Fortunately essentially all science issues are being addressed in the community (e.g. in EUROfusion). The computational demands are excessive today, but the rapid development of both computing power and numerical techniques is likely to transform the situation in the next 10-20 years.</abstract><type>Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract</type><journal>26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference</journal><publisher>IAEA FEC 2016</publisher><placeOfPublication>Kyoto, Japan</placeOfPublication><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>10</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2016</publishedYear><publishedDate>2016-10-31</publishedDate><doi/><url>https://conferences.iaea.org/indico/event/98/session/31/contribution/521</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>ACEM</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-05-15T12:03:44.9752883</lastEdited><Created>2018-05-08T11:13:17.4340214</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>A W</firstname><surname>Morris</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Llion</firstname><surname>Evans</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4964-4187</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>J R</firstname><surname>Harrison</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>B</firstname><surname>Lipschultz</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>S</firstname><surname>McIntosh</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>E</firstname><surname>Surrey</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>C</firstname><surname>Waldon</surname><order>7</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2018-05-15T12:03:44.9752883 v2 39997 2018-05-08 Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices 74dc5084c47484922a6e0135ebcb9402 0000-0002-4964-4187 Llion Evans Llion Evans true false 2018-05-08 ACEM Plasma exhaust is a critical aspect of DEMO-class devices, so there needs to be confidence that it will work. This paper considers the methodology to establish confidence in potential solutions, drawing on approaches inside and outside fusion, including evolving high power computing tools – these approaches could also help find improved solutions, , possibly where all the plasma and materials ingredients operate in known regimes, reducing uncertainty. Crucially, the elements need to be integrated into an overall solution that can meet the demanding performance requirements and constraints of a fusion plant yet also accommodate significant uncertainties in plasma, materials and component behaviour.A prior full scale test of a DEMO exhaust solution is not feasible, almost by definition. The reference approach is to take the best available design, with various uncertainties and unknowns, and use margins and risk mitigation tools to address these. We explore a complementary approach based on models for the final step to give more confidence in the performance and uncertainty range of the design. The two approaches could be combined.For the plasma aspects, qualification will be eased if solutions have resilience to uncertainties and variations, ideally with natural “springiness”, or damping of transients. These can be tested with integrated models containing all relevant mechanisms and interactions, suitably validated.Materials and components have comparable modelling and integration challenges, in particular predicting the effects of combined loads (e.g. neutron, thermal, mechanical). A possible strategy is to combine measured and predicted materials properties and failure mechanisms (such as crack propagation, deformation) into a hierarchical multiscale model from atom-scale up. Such a modelling workflow would be well suited to high levels of parallelisation and would improve over use of average material properties.In-silico qualification of such a large and complex system is very challenging, but has large potential benefits in cost, time, flexibility and optimisation. Fortunately essentially all science issues are being addressed in the community (e.g. in EUROfusion). The computational demands are excessive today, but the rapid development of both computing power and numerical techniques is likely to transform the situation in the next 10-20 years. Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference IAEA FEC 2016 Kyoto, Japan 31 10 2016 2016-10-31 https://conferences.iaea.org/indico/event/98/session/31/contribution/521 COLLEGE NANME Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering COLLEGE CODE ACEM Swansea University 2018-05-15T12:03:44.9752883 2018-05-08T11:13:17.4340214 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering A W Morris 1 Llion Evans 0000-0002-4964-4187 2 J R Harrison 3 B Lipschultz 4 S McIntosh 5 E Surrey 6 C Waldon 7 |
title |
Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices |
spellingShingle |
Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices Llion Evans |
title_short |
Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices |
title_full |
Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices |
title_fullStr |
Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices |
title_sort |
Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices |
author_id_str_mv |
74dc5084c47484922a6e0135ebcb9402 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
74dc5084c47484922a6e0135ebcb9402_***_Llion Evans |
author |
Llion Evans |
author2 |
A W Morris Llion Evans J R Harrison B Lipschultz S McIntosh E Surrey C Waldon |
format |
Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract |
container_title |
26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference |
publishDate |
2016 |
institution |
Swansea University |
publisher |
IAEA FEC 2016 |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Mechanical Engineering |
url |
https://conferences.iaea.org/indico/event/98/session/31/contribution/521 |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Plasma exhaust is a critical aspect of DEMO-class devices, so there needs to be confidence that it will work. This paper considers the methodology to establish confidence in potential solutions, drawing on approaches inside and outside fusion, including evolving high power computing tools – these approaches could also help find improved solutions, , possibly where all the plasma and materials ingredients operate in known regimes, reducing uncertainty. Crucially, the elements need to be integrated into an overall solution that can meet the demanding performance requirements and constraints of a fusion plant yet also accommodate significant uncertainties in plasma, materials and component behaviour.A prior full scale test of a DEMO exhaust solution is not feasible, almost by definition. The reference approach is to take the best available design, with various uncertainties and unknowns, and use margins and risk mitigation tools to address these. We explore a complementary approach based on models for the final step to give more confidence in the performance and uncertainty range of the design. The two approaches could be combined.For the plasma aspects, qualification will be eased if solutions have resilience to uncertainties and variations, ideally with natural “springiness”, or damping of transients. These can be tested with integrated models containing all relevant mechanisms and interactions, suitably validated.Materials and components have comparable modelling and integration challenges, in particular predicting the effects of combined loads (e.g. neutron, thermal, mechanical). A possible strategy is to combine measured and predicted materials properties and failure mechanisms (such as crack propagation, deformation) into a hierarchical multiscale model from atom-scale up. Such a modelling workflow would be well suited to high levels of parallelisation and would improve over use of average material properties.In-silico qualification of such a large and complex system is very challenging, but has large potential benefits in cost, time, flexibility and optimisation. Fortunately essentially all science issues are being addressed in the community (e.g. in EUROfusion). The computational demands are excessive today, but the rapid development of both computing power and numerical techniques is likely to transform the situation in the next 10-20 years. |
published_date |
2016-10-31T19:24:27Z |
_version_ |
1821344077059194880 |
score |
11.04748 |