No Cover Image

Journal article 1073 views 131 downloads

Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study

Christopher Mesagno, Denise Hill Orcid Logo, Paul Larkin

Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Volume: 19, Pages: 85 - 94

Swansea University Author: Denise Hill Orcid Logo

Abstract

ObjectivesResearchers have identified that pre-performance routines improve performance under pressure, yet have not investigated the effects of post-performance routines. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to examine whether the type of performance routine training could improve tenpin bowl...

Full description

Published in: Psychology of Sport and Exercise
ISSN: 1469-0292
Published: 2015
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa35675
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2017-09-27T12:57:19Z
last_indexed 2019-09-24T19:51:09Z
id cronfa35675
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-09-24T16:12:41.9382888</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>35675</id><entry>2017-09-27</entry><title>Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>9bca603dad273604f16acfb1178b1d83</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8580-4048</ORCID><firstname>Denise</firstname><surname>Hill</surname><name>Denise Hill</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-09-27</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>ObjectivesResearchers have identified that pre-performance routines improve performance under pressure, yet have not investigated the effects of post-performance routines. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to examine whether the type of performance routine training could improve tenpin bowling accuracy and in-game performance.DesignA mixed-method design was adopted, whereby the impact of a performance routine intervention on performance accuracy and in-game performance was examined. This was followed by participants completing semi-structured interviews which explored the perceived effect of those routines.MethodThirty-six experienced tenpin bowlers completed 30 accuracy shots pre- and post-intervention training, with league scores obtained for in-game performance comparison. Four groups (i.e., pre-performance routine [PPR], post-performance routine [POST], combined pre-post routine, and a control group) practiced 12 games across four weeks while listening to the group specific routine instruction on an IPod.ResultsIt was noted that accuracy improved (albeit non-significantly) for the PPR and combined pre-post routine group, but not the other groups. Critically, all intervention groups (PPR, POST &amp; COMBO) improved in-game performance. The qualitative data indicated that both the PPR and POST was perceived to influence positively performance, attentional and emotional control, self-awareness, self-confidence, motivation. The PPR was also considered to enhance a state of readiness, and perceived control.ConclusionsResults indicate that the PPR training enhanced accuracy and in-game performance, with the POST training acting as a supportive role for in-game performance as evidenced by the qualitative and quantitative data. Future research should continue to investigate the effects of POSTs.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Psychology of Sport and Exercise</journal><volume>19</volume><paginationStart>85</paginationStart><paginationEnd>94</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>1469-0292</issnPrint><keywords>Pre-shot routine; Post-shot routine; Self-regulation</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2015</publishedYear><publishedDate>2015-07-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.03.005</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-09-24T16:12:41.9382888</lastEdited><Created>2017-09-27T08:28:09.6907109</Created><authors><author><firstname>Christopher</firstname><surname>Mesagno</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Denise</firstname><surname>Hill</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8580-4048</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Paul</firstname><surname>Larkin</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0035675-17102017121356.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Examining_the_accuracyand_in_game.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-10-17T12:13:56.6500000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>604531</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2017-10-17T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-09-24T16:12:41.9382888 v2 35675 2017-09-27 Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study 9bca603dad273604f16acfb1178b1d83 0000-0001-8580-4048 Denise Hill Denise Hill true false 2017-09-27 STSC ObjectivesResearchers have identified that pre-performance routines improve performance under pressure, yet have not investigated the effects of post-performance routines. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to examine whether the type of performance routine training could improve tenpin bowling accuracy and in-game performance.DesignA mixed-method design was adopted, whereby the impact of a performance routine intervention on performance accuracy and in-game performance was examined. This was followed by participants completing semi-structured interviews which explored the perceived effect of those routines.MethodThirty-six experienced tenpin bowlers completed 30 accuracy shots pre- and post-intervention training, with league scores obtained for in-game performance comparison. Four groups (i.e., pre-performance routine [PPR], post-performance routine [POST], combined pre-post routine, and a control group) practiced 12 games across four weeks while listening to the group specific routine instruction on an IPod.ResultsIt was noted that accuracy improved (albeit non-significantly) for the PPR and combined pre-post routine group, but not the other groups. Critically, all intervention groups (PPR, POST & COMBO) improved in-game performance. The qualitative data indicated that both the PPR and POST was perceived to influence positively performance, attentional and emotional control, self-awareness, self-confidence, motivation. The PPR was also considered to enhance a state of readiness, and perceived control.ConclusionsResults indicate that the PPR training enhanced accuracy and in-game performance, with the POST training acting as a supportive role for in-game performance as evidenced by the qualitative and quantitative data. Future research should continue to investigate the effects of POSTs. Journal Article Psychology of Sport and Exercise 19 85 94 1469-0292 Pre-shot routine; Post-shot routine; Self-regulation 31 7 2015 2015-07-31 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.03.005 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2019-09-24T16:12:41.9382888 2017-09-27T08:28:09.6907109 Christopher Mesagno 1 Denise Hill 0000-0001-8580-4048 2 Paul Larkin 3 0035675-17102017121356.pdf Examining_the_accuracyand_in_game.pdf 2017-10-17T12:13:56.6500000 Output 604531 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2017-10-17T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study
spellingShingle Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study
Denise Hill
title_short Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study
title_full Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study
title_fullStr Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study
title_sort Examining the accuracy and in-game performance effects between pre- and post-performance routines: A mixed methods study
author_id_str_mv 9bca603dad273604f16acfb1178b1d83
author_id_fullname_str_mv 9bca603dad273604f16acfb1178b1d83_***_Denise Hill
author Denise Hill
author2 Christopher Mesagno
Denise Hill
Paul Larkin
format Journal article
container_title Psychology of Sport and Exercise
container_volume 19
container_start_page 85
publishDate 2015
institution Swansea University
issn 1469-0292
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.03.005
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description ObjectivesResearchers have identified that pre-performance routines improve performance under pressure, yet have not investigated the effects of post-performance routines. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to examine whether the type of performance routine training could improve tenpin bowling accuracy and in-game performance.DesignA mixed-method design was adopted, whereby the impact of a performance routine intervention on performance accuracy and in-game performance was examined. This was followed by participants completing semi-structured interviews which explored the perceived effect of those routines.MethodThirty-six experienced tenpin bowlers completed 30 accuracy shots pre- and post-intervention training, with league scores obtained for in-game performance comparison. Four groups (i.e., pre-performance routine [PPR], post-performance routine [POST], combined pre-post routine, and a control group) practiced 12 games across four weeks while listening to the group specific routine instruction on an IPod.ResultsIt was noted that accuracy improved (albeit non-significantly) for the PPR and combined pre-post routine group, but not the other groups. Critically, all intervention groups (PPR, POST & COMBO) improved in-game performance. The qualitative data indicated that both the PPR and POST was perceived to influence positively performance, attentional and emotional control, self-awareness, self-confidence, motivation. The PPR was also considered to enhance a state of readiness, and perceived control.ConclusionsResults indicate that the PPR training enhanced accuracy and in-game performance, with the POST training acting as a supportive role for in-game performance as evidenced by the qualitative and quantitative data. Future research should continue to investigate the effects of POSTs.
published_date 2015-07-31T03:44:27Z
_version_ 1763752088633868288
score 11.037603