No Cover Image

Journal article 1346 views 178 downloads

Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints

Niels B. J. Vollaard, Richard Metcalfe Orcid Logo

Sports Medicine

Swansea University Author: Richard Metcalfe Orcid Logo

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1007/s40279-017-0727-x

Abstract

Over the past decade, it has been convincingly shown that regularly performing repeated brief supramaximal cycle sprints (sprint interval training [SIT]) is associated with aerobic adaptations and health benefits similar to or greater than with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). SIT is o...

Full description

Published in: Sports Medicine
ISSN: 0112-1642 1179-2035
Published: 2017
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa35661
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2017-09-26T18:57:54Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T05:27:06Z
id cronfa35661
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2017-10-03T15:18:34.6299482</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>35661</id><entry>2017-09-26</entry><title>Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>9bb783273dd9d54a2f3f66f75c43abdf</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0980-2977</ORCID><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Metcalfe</surname><name>Richard Metcalfe</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-09-26</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>Over the past decade, it has been convincingly shown that regularly performing repeated brief supramaximal cycle sprints (sprint interval training [SIT]) is associated with aerobic adaptations and health benefits similar to or greater than with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). SIT is often promoted as a time-efficient exercise strategy, but the most commonly studied SIT protocol (4&#x2013;6 repeated 30-s Wingate sprints with 4 min recovery, here referred to as &#x2018;classic&#x2019; SIT) takes up to approximately 30 min per session. Combined with high associated perceived exertion, this makes classic SIT unsuitable as an alternative/adjunct to current exercise recommendations involving MICT. However, there are no indications that the design of the classic SIT protocol has been based on considerations regarding the lowest number or shortest duration of sprints to optimise time efficiency while retaining the associated health benefits. In recent years, studies have shown that novel SIT protocols with both fewer and shorter sprints are efficacious at improving important risk factors of noncommunicable diseases in sedentary individuals, and provide health benefits that are no worse than those associated with classic SIT. These shorter/easier protocols have the potential to remove many of the common barriers to exercise in the general population. Thus, based on the evidence summarised in this current opinion paper, we propose that there is a need for a fundamental change in focus in SIT research in order to move away from further characterising the classic SIT protocol and towards establishing acceptable and effective protocols that involve minimal sprint durations and repetitions.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Sports Medicine</journal><publisher/><issnPrint>0112-1642</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1179-2035</issnElectronic><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1007/s40279-017-0727-x</doi><url>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40279-017-0727-x</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2017-10-03T15:18:34.6299482</lastEdited><Created>2017-09-26T13:33:22.2476407</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Niels B. J.</firstname><surname>Vollaard</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Metcalfe</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0980-2977</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0035661-29092017101503.pdf</filename><originalFilename>VollaardandMetcalfeOpinionPieceFinalVersion.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-09-29T10:15:03.3000000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>488657</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2017-09-29T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>false</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2017-10-03T15:18:34.6299482 v2 35661 2017-09-26 Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints 9bb783273dd9d54a2f3f66f75c43abdf 0000-0003-0980-2977 Richard Metcalfe Richard Metcalfe true false 2017-09-26 STSC Over the past decade, it has been convincingly shown that regularly performing repeated brief supramaximal cycle sprints (sprint interval training [SIT]) is associated with aerobic adaptations and health benefits similar to or greater than with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). SIT is often promoted as a time-efficient exercise strategy, but the most commonly studied SIT protocol (4–6 repeated 30-s Wingate sprints with 4 min recovery, here referred to as ‘classic’ SIT) takes up to approximately 30 min per session. Combined with high associated perceived exertion, this makes classic SIT unsuitable as an alternative/adjunct to current exercise recommendations involving MICT. However, there are no indications that the design of the classic SIT protocol has been based on considerations regarding the lowest number or shortest duration of sprints to optimise time efficiency while retaining the associated health benefits. In recent years, studies have shown that novel SIT protocols with both fewer and shorter sprints are efficacious at improving important risk factors of noncommunicable diseases in sedentary individuals, and provide health benefits that are no worse than those associated with classic SIT. These shorter/easier protocols have the potential to remove many of the common barriers to exercise in the general population. Thus, based on the evidence summarised in this current opinion paper, we propose that there is a need for a fundamental change in focus in SIT research in order to move away from further characterising the classic SIT protocol and towards establishing acceptable and effective protocols that involve minimal sprint durations and repetitions. Journal Article Sports Medicine 0112-1642 1179-2035 31 12 2017 2017-12-31 10.1007/s40279-017-0727-x https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40279-017-0727-x COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2017-10-03T15:18:34.6299482 2017-09-26T13:33:22.2476407 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Niels B. J. Vollaard 1 Richard Metcalfe 0000-0003-0980-2977 2 0035661-29092017101503.pdf VollaardandMetcalfeOpinionPieceFinalVersion.pdf 2017-09-29T10:15:03.3000000 Output 488657 application/pdf Version of Record true 2017-09-29T00:00:00.0000000 false eng
title Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints
spellingShingle Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints
Richard Metcalfe
title_short Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints
title_full Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints
title_fullStr Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints
title_full_unstemmed Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints
title_sort Research into the Health Benefits of Sprint Interval Training Should Focus on Protocols with Fewer and Shorter Sprints
author_id_str_mv 9bb783273dd9d54a2f3f66f75c43abdf
author_id_fullname_str_mv 9bb783273dd9d54a2f3f66f75c43abdf_***_Richard Metcalfe
author Richard Metcalfe
author2 Niels B. J. Vollaard
Richard Metcalfe
format Journal article
container_title Sports Medicine
publishDate 2017
institution Swansea University
issn 0112-1642
1179-2035
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40279-017-0727-x
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
url https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40279-017-0727-x
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Over the past decade, it has been convincingly shown that regularly performing repeated brief supramaximal cycle sprints (sprint interval training [SIT]) is associated with aerobic adaptations and health benefits similar to or greater than with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). SIT is often promoted as a time-efficient exercise strategy, but the most commonly studied SIT protocol (4–6 repeated 30-s Wingate sprints with 4 min recovery, here referred to as ‘classic’ SIT) takes up to approximately 30 min per session. Combined with high associated perceived exertion, this makes classic SIT unsuitable as an alternative/adjunct to current exercise recommendations involving MICT. However, there are no indications that the design of the classic SIT protocol has been based on considerations regarding the lowest number or shortest duration of sprints to optimise time efficiency while retaining the associated health benefits. In recent years, studies have shown that novel SIT protocols with both fewer and shorter sprints are efficacious at improving important risk factors of noncommunicable diseases in sedentary individuals, and provide health benefits that are no worse than those associated with classic SIT. These shorter/easier protocols have the potential to remove many of the common barriers to exercise in the general population. Thus, based on the evidence summarised in this current opinion paper, we propose that there is a need for a fundamental change in focus in SIT research in order to move away from further characterising the classic SIT protocol and towards establishing acceptable and effective protocols that involve minimal sprint durations and repetitions.
published_date 2017-12-31T03:44:26Z
_version_ 1763752087219339264
score 11.037056

Similar Items