No Cover Image

Journal article 1200 views

Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus

Gideon Calder Orcid Logo, Magali Bessone

Raisons politiques, Volume: 66, Issue: 2, Start page: 143

Swansea University Author: Gideon Calder Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.3917/rai.066.0143

Abstract

Families are very often defined as groups – and occupy a key place in the analysis both of individuals' lived affiliations, and of wider aspects of society and policy. Yet the family barely features in political and normative debates about groups. This article addresses whether families are ind...

Full description

Published in: Raisons politiques
ISSN: 1291-1941 1950-6708
Published: 2017
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa33955
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2017-05-26T20:04:36Z
last_indexed 2020-10-20T02:44:17Z
id cronfa33955
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-10-19T10:33:58.7183235</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>33955</id><entry>2017-05-26</entry><title>Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>7a50a4eeeb5c00bad3acd160cf138a8e</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5668-1824</ORCID><firstname>Gideon</firstname><surname>Calder</surname><name>Gideon Calder</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-05-26</date><deptcode>APC</deptcode><abstract>Families are very often defined as groups &#x2013; and occupy a key place in the analysis both of individuals' lived affiliations, and of wider aspects of society and policy. Yet the family barely features in political and normative debates about groups. This article addresses whether families are indeed groups, in the senses in which political theorists tackle group-related issues. The argument has three main parts. The first compares four general perspectives on this: N&#xB4; ew Right&#x2019; individualism, liberal egalitarianism, communitarianism and care ethics. For the first two, the family is treated as a kind of &#x201C;macro individual&#x201D;; for the latter two, as a &#x201C;micro group&#x201D;. The second part identifies three threats families pose to social justice &#x2013; all of which are likely to apply to any other putative group. The third part distinguishes between two ways of distinguishing types of groups, according, respectively, to whether or not they are belief-based or cultural in nature. On the basis of this analysis, I argue that we should indeed address the family as a micro group, and that the particular significance of its roles in individuals&#x2019; lives should be factored into wider debates on groups and their political implications.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Raisons politiques</journal><volume>66</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>143</paginationStart><publisher/><issnPrint>1291-1941</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1950-6708</issnElectronic><keywords>families, groups, individualism, New Right, liberal egalitarianism, communitarianism, care ethics</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-06-01</publishedDate><doi>10.3917/rai.066.0143</doi><url>http://www.cairn.info/revue-raisons-politiques-2017-2-page-143.htm</url><notes>This is a translation of an article originally written in English, as 'Families, between groups and individuals'. (Prof Magali Bessone is translator, rather than co-author.) The English version of the text accepted for publication is uploaded here.</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>APC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-10-19T10:33:58.7183235</lastEdited><Created>2017-05-26T15:17:55.9331262</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Health and Social Care - Public Health</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Gideon</firstname><surname>Calder</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5668-1824</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Magali</firstname><surname>Bessone</surname><order>2</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2020-10-19T10:33:58.7183235 v2 33955 2017-05-26 Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus 7a50a4eeeb5c00bad3acd160cf138a8e 0000-0002-5668-1824 Gideon Calder Gideon Calder true false 2017-05-26 APC Families are very often defined as groups – and occupy a key place in the analysis both of individuals' lived affiliations, and of wider aspects of society and policy. Yet the family barely features in political and normative debates about groups. This article addresses whether families are indeed groups, in the senses in which political theorists tackle group-related issues. The argument has three main parts. The first compares four general perspectives on this: N´ ew Right’ individualism, liberal egalitarianism, communitarianism and care ethics. For the first two, the family is treated as a kind of “macro individual”; for the latter two, as a “micro group”. The second part identifies three threats families pose to social justice – all of which are likely to apply to any other putative group. The third part distinguishes between two ways of distinguishing types of groups, according, respectively, to whether or not they are belief-based or cultural in nature. On the basis of this analysis, I argue that we should indeed address the family as a micro group, and that the particular significance of its roles in individuals’ lives should be factored into wider debates on groups and their political implications. Journal Article Raisons politiques 66 2 143 1291-1941 1950-6708 families, groups, individualism, New Right, liberal egalitarianism, communitarianism, care ethics 1 6 2017 2017-06-01 10.3917/rai.066.0143 http://www.cairn.info/revue-raisons-politiques-2017-2-page-143.htm This is a translation of an article originally written in English, as 'Families, between groups and individuals'. (Prof Magali Bessone is translator, rather than co-author.) The English version of the text accepted for publication is uploaded here. COLLEGE NANME Politics, Philosophy and International Relations COLLEGE CODE APC Swansea University 2020-10-19T10:33:58.7183235 2017-05-26T15:17:55.9331262 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Health and Social Care - Public Health Gideon Calder 0000-0002-5668-1824 1 Magali Bessone 2
title Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus
spellingShingle Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus
Gideon Calder
title_short Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus
title_full Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus
title_fullStr Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus
title_full_unstemmed Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus
title_sort Les familles dans la philosophie normative, entre groupes et individus
author_id_str_mv 7a50a4eeeb5c00bad3acd160cf138a8e
author_id_fullname_str_mv 7a50a4eeeb5c00bad3acd160cf138a8e_***_Gideon Calder
author Gideon Calder
author2 Gideon Calder
Magali Bessone
format Journal article
container_title Raisons politiques
container_volume 66
container_issue 2
container_start_page 143
publishDate 2017
institution Swansea University
issn 1291-1941
1950-6708
doi_str_mv 10.3917/rai.066.0143
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Health and Social Care - Public Health{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Health and Social Care - Public Health
url http://www.cairn.info/revue-raisons-politiques-2017-2-page-143.htm
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Families are very often defined as groups – and occupy a key place in the analysis both of individuals' lived affiliations, and of wider aspects of society and policy. Yet the family barely features in political and normative debates about groups. This article addresses whether families are indeed groups, in the senses in which political theorists tackle group-related issues. The argument has three main parts. The first compares four general perspectives on this: N´ ew Right’ individualism, liberal egalitarianism, communitarianism and care ethics. For the first two, the family is treated as a kind of “macro individual”; for the latter two, as a “micro group”. The second part identifies three threats families pose to social justice – all of which are likely to apply to any other putative group. The third part distinguishes between two ways of distinguishing types of groups, according, respectively, to whether or not they are belief-based or cultural in nature. On the basis of this analysis, I argue that we should indeed address the family as a micro group, and that the particular significance of its roles in individuals’ lives should be factored into wider debates on groups and their political implications.
published_date 2017-06-01T03:42:06Z
_version_ 1763751941116002304
score 11.013194

Similar Items