No Cover Image

Journal article 1306 views 232 downloads

Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy?

Dave Bewley-Taylor, David Bewley-Taylor Orcid Logo

Drugs and Alcohol Today, Volume: 17, Issue: 2

Swansea University Author: David Bewley-Taylor Orcid Logo

Abstract

Purpose – This article aims to examine the extent to which the dominant metrics currentlyused to measure the success of the UN based global drug prohibition regime are in manyways inadequate and consequently contribute to systemic inertia. Within this context, it seeksto explore the potential of exp...

Full description

Published in: Drugs and Alcohol Today
ISSN: 1745-9265
Published: 2017
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa32962
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2017-05-25T20:00:41Z
last_indexed 2020-07-15T12:50:38Z
id cronfa32962
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-07-15T12:39:23.0888291</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>32962</id><entry>2017-04-06</entry><title>Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the &#x2018;metrics trap&#x2019; and modernise international drug control policy?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>0807b03501c47902946df41da4ddf2a4</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-1724-4223</ORCID><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Bewley-Taylor</surname><name>David Bewley-Taylor</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-04-06</date><deptcode>APC</deptcode><abstract>Purpose &#x2013; This article aims to examine the extent to which the dominant metrics currentlyused to measure the success of the UN based global drug prohibition regime are in manyways inadequate and consequently contribute to systemic inertia. Within this context, it seeksto explore the potential of explicitly linking drug policy to the recently launched SustainableDevelopment Agenda and the associated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to initiatea change in approach.Design/methodology/approach &#x2013; Framing the topic in terms of International Relations (IR)and regime analysis, prominent examples of where current metrics are imprecise (therelationship between production and seizures), misconceived (drug use) and missing (arange of drug and drug policy related harms) are explored. Attention is then given to anexamination of international development as a model for measuring drug control outcomes,including a discussion of the SDGs in general and the intersection between drug policyinterventions and several Goals in particular.Findings - While aware of the complexity of the issue area, the article finds that there areconsiderable shortcomings in the way international drug policy outcomes are currentlyassessed. Although methodological problems are likely to persist, linking drug policy with theSDGs and their associated metrics offers the potential to help to shift the focus ofinternational policy in a manner that would benefit not only UN system-wide coherence onthe issue, but also assist in the achievement of the regime&#x2019;s own overarching goal; tosafeguard the &#x2018;health and welfare&#x2019; of humankind.Practical implications &#x2013; With the next high-level review of international drug policy due to takeplace in 2019, the article offers policy makers with a way to begin to refocus drug policymetrics, and subsequently review outcomes, in line with the UN system-wide SustainableDevelopment Agenda.Originality &#x2013; As an emerging domain of inquiry, the article not only explores a hitherto largelyunexplored &#x2013; yet increasingly important &#x2013; facet of UN level policy evaluation, formulation andimplementation, but also helps to fill a gap in the IR literature on regime dynamics.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Drugs and Alcohol Today</journal><volume>17</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><publisher/><issnPrint>1745-9265</issnPrint><keywords>UNGASS, international drug policy, drug policy harms, Sustainable Development Goals, regime analysis, Human Development</keywords><publishedDay>5</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-06-05</publishedDate><doi>10.1108/DAT-12-2016-0033</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>APC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-07-15T12:39:23.0888291</lastEdited><Created>2017-04-06T16:25:18.1295313</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Dave</firstname><surname>Bewley-Taylor</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Bewley-Taylor</surname><orcid>0000-0003-1724-4223</orcid><order>2</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0032962-25052017145917.pdf</filename><originalFilename>DAT_Metrics_PDF_AM.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-05-25T14:59:17.3170000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>426938</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Accepted Manuscript</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2018-05-25T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2020-07-15T12:39:23.0888291 v2 32962 2017-04-06 Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy? 0807b03501c47902946df41da4ddf2a4 0000-0003-1724-4223 David Bewley-Taylor David Bewley-Taylor true false 2017-04-06 APC Purpose – This article aims to examine the extent to which the dominant metrics currentlyused to measure the success of the UN based global drug prohibition regime are in manyways inadequate and consequently contribute to systemic inertia. Within this context, it seeksto explore the potential of explicitly linking drug policy to the recently launched SustainableDevelopment Agenda and the associated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to initiatea change in approach.Design/methodology/approach – Framing the topic in terms of International Relations (IR)and regime analysis, prominent examples of where current metrics are imprecise (therelationship between production and seizures), misconceived (drug use) and missing (arange of drug and drug policy related harms) are explored. Attention is then given to anexamination of international development as a model for measuring drug control outcomes,including a discussion of the SDGs in general and the intersection between drug policyinterventions and several Goals in particular.Findings - While aware of the complexity of the issue area, the article finds that there areconsiderable shortcomings in the way international drug policy outcomes are currentlyassessed. Although methodological problems are likely to persist, linking drug policy with theSDGs and their associated metrics offers the potential to help to shift the focus ofinternational policy in a manner that would benefit not only UN system-wide coherence onthe issue, but also assist in the achievement of the regime’s own overarching goal; tosafeguard the ‘health and welfare’ of humankind.Practical implications – With the next high-level review of international drug policy due to takeplace in 2019, the article offers policy makers with a way to begin to refocus drug policymetrics, and subsequently review outcomes, in line with the UN system-wide SustainableDevelopment Agenda.Originality – As an emerging domain of inquiry, the article not only explores a hitherto largelyunexplored – yet increasingly important – facet of UN level policy evaluation, formulation andimplementation, but also helps to fill a gap in the IR literature on regime dynamics. Journal Article Drugs and Alcohol Today 17 2 1745-9265 UNGASS, international drug policy, drug policy harms, Sustainable Development Goals, regime analysis, Human Development 5 6 2017 2017-06-05 10.1108/DAT-12-2016-0033 COLLEGE NANME Politics, Philosophy and International Relations COLLEGE CODE APC Swansea University 2020-07-15T12:39:23.0888291 2017-04-06T16:25:18.1295313 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Dave Bewley-Taylor 1 David Bewley-Taylor 0000-0003-1724-4223 2 0032962-25052017145917.pdf DAT_Metrics_PDF_AM.pdf 2017-05-25T14:59:17.3170000 Output 426938 application/pdf Accepted Manuscript true 2018-05-25T00:00:00.0000000 true eng
title Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy?
spellingShingle Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy?
David Bewley-Taylor
title_short Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy?
title_full Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy?
title_fullStr Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy?
title_full_unstemmed Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy?
title_sort Refocusing metrics: can the sustainable development goals help break the ‘metrics trap’ and modernise international drug control policy?
author_id_str_mv 0807b03501c47902946df41da4ddf2a4
author_id_fullname_str_mv 0807b03501c47902946df41da4ddf2a4_***_David Bewley-Taylor
author David Bewley-Taylor
author2 Dave Bewley-Taylor
David Bewley-Taylor
format Journal article
container_title Drugs and Alcohol Today
container_volume 17
container_issue 2
publishDate 2017
institution Swansea University
issn 1745-9265
doi_str_mv 10.1108/DAT-12-2016-0033
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Purpose – This article aims to examine the extent to which the dominant metrics currentlyused to measure the success of the UN based global drug prohibition regime are in manyways inadequate and consequently contribute to systemic inertia. Within this context, it seeksto explore the potential of explicitly linking drug policy to the recently launched SustainableDevelopment Agenda and the associated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to initiatea change in approach.Design/methodology/approach – Framing the topic in terms of International Relations (IR)and regime analysis, prominent examples of where current metrics are imprecise (therelationship between production and seizures), misconceived (drug use) and missing (arange of drug and drug policy related harms) are explored. Attention is then given to anexamination of international development as a model for measuring drug control outcomes,including a discussion of the SDGs in general and the intersection between drug policyinterventions and several Goals in particular.Findings - While aware of the complexity of the issue area, the article finds that there areconsiderable shortcomings in the way international drug policy outcomes are currentlyassessed. Although methodological problems are likely to persist, linking drug policy with theSDGs and their associated metrics offers the potential to help to shift the focus ofinternational policy in a manner that would benefit not only UN system-wide coherence onthe issue, but also assist in the achievement of the regime’s own overarching goal; tosafeguard the ‘health and welfare’ of humankind.Practical implications – With the next high-level review of international drug policy due to takeplace in 2019, the article offers policy makers with a way to begin to refocus drug policymetrics, and subsequently review outcomes, in line with the UN system-wide SustainableDevelopment Agenda.Originality – As an emerging domain of inquiry, the article not only explores a hitherto largelyunexplored – yet increasingly important – facet of UN level policy evaluation, formulation andimplementation, but also helps to fill a gap in the IR literature on regime dynamics.
published_date 2017-06-05T03:40:33Z
_version_ 1763751843672883200
score 11.013148