No Cover Image

Journal article 1183 views 167 downloads

Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand

Nithra Kitreerawutiwong, Sue Jordan Orcid Logo, David Hughes

PLOS ONE, Volume: 12, Issue: 3, Start page: e0174055

Swansea University Authors: Sue Jordan Orcid Logo, David Hughes

  • FacilitytypeandPCperformace.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

    Download (489.26KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1371/journal.pone.0174055

Abstract

This paper examines primary care performance in three types of community health facilities in five provinces in northern Thailand. Tambon (sub-district) health promotion hospitals (THPHs) were introduced in 2009 to upgrade the services offered by the previous health centres, but were hampered by sho...

Full description

Published in: PLOS ONE
ISSN: 1932-6203
Published: PLOS 2017
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa32382
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2017-03-14T14:00:20Z
last_indexed 2020-10-16T02:43:33Z
id cronfa32382
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-10-15T14:22:28.4299492</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>32382</id><entry>2017-03-14</entry><title>Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>24ce9db29b4bde1af4e83b388aae0ea1</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5691-2987</ORCID><firstname>Sue</firstname><surname>Jordan</surname><name>Sue Jordan</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>f1fbd458e3c75d8b597c0ac8036f2b88</sid><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Hughes</surname><name>David Hughes</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2017-03-14</date><deptcode>HNU</deptcode><abstract>This paper examines primary care performance in three types of community health facilities in five provinces in northern Thailand. Tambon (sub-district) health promotion hospitals (THPHs) were introduced in 2009 to upgrade the services offered by the previous health centres, but were hampered by shortages of trained doctors and nurses. The Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) designated three categories of THPH, defined according to whether they were regularly staffed by a medical practitioner, a qualified nurse or non-clinical public health officers. While the plan is to move over time to doctor-staffed THPHs, many rural areas rely on facilities staffed by public health officers or nurses. The study used structured interviews to measure patient views on performance, defined in terms of accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, co-ordination and community orientation, in 23 THPHs divided across the three types. Counter-intuitively it was the THPHs staffed by public health officers which achieved the highest scores, followed by nurse-staffed facilities and then doctor-staffed facilities. The sharpest differences found were in the scores for accessibility, continuity, and comprehensiveness of care. The authors argue that these are associated with local services, which rural patients in particular value more than services offered by doctors on rotation in larger outpatient department-like centres. Patients value these aspects of care more than professional skill-mix per se. This is not an argument for delaying an increase in use of qualified staff, but an indication of the need to do this in a way that preserves the features of local services that patients value.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>PLOS ONE</journal><volume>12</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>e0174055</paginationStart><publisher>PLOS</publisher><issnElectronic>1932-6203</issnElectronic><keywords>primary care, primary care assessment, primary care performance, health workforce</keywords><publishedDay>24</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2017</publishedYear><publishedDate>2017-03-24</publishedDate><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0174055</doi><url/><notes>The initial analysis was undertaken while Nithra Kitreerawutiwong was a visiting researcher at Swansea University.Open access at:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174055</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Nursing</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HNU</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><degreesponsorsfunders>Naresuan University</degreesponsorsfunders><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-10-15T14:22:28.4299492</lastEdited><Created>2017-03-14T06:32:19.5683485</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Health and Social Care - Public Health</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Nithra</firstname><surname>Kitreerawutiwong</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Sue</firstname><surname>Jordan</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5691-2987</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Hughes</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0032382-27032017075119.pdf</filename><originalFilename>FacilitytypeandPCperformace.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2017-03-27T07:51:19.5600000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>760066</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><embargoDate>2017-03-24T00:00:00.0000000</embargoDate><documentNotes>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2020-10-15T14:22:28.4299492 v2 32382 2017-03-14 Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand 24ce9db29b4bde1af4e83b388aae0ea1 0000-0002-5691-2987 Sue Jordan Sue Jordan true false f1fbd458e3c75d8b597c0ac8036f2b88 David Hughes David Hughes true false 2017-03-14 HNU This paper examines primary care performance in three types of community health facilities in five provinces in northern Thailand. Tambon (sub-district) health promotion hospitals (THPHs) were introduced in 2009 to upgrade the services offered by the previous health centres, but were hampered by shortages of trained doctors and nurses. The Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) designated three categories of THPH, defined according to whether they were regularly staffed by a medical practitioner, a qualified nurse or non-clinical public health officers. While the plan is to move over time to doctor-staffed THPHs, many rural areas rely on facilities staffed by public health officers or nurses. The study used structured interviews to measure patient views on performance, defined in terms of accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, co-ordination and community orientation, in 23 THPHs divided across the three types. Counter-intuitively it was the THPHs staffed by public health officers which achieved the highest scores, followed by nurse-staffed facilities and then doctor-staffed facilities. The sharpest differences found were in the scores for accessibility, continuity, and comprehensiveness of care. The authors argue that these are associated with local services, which rural patients in particular value more than services offered by doctors on rotation in larger outpatient department-like centres. Patients value these aspects of care more than professional skill-mix per se. This is not an argument for delaying an increase in use of qualified staff, but an indication of the need to do this in a way that preserves the features of local services that patients value. Journal Article PLOS ONE 12 3 e0174055 PLOS 1932-6203 primary care, primary care assessment, primary care performance, health workforce 24 3 2017 2017-03-24 10.1371/journal.pone.0174055 The initial analysis was undertaken while Nithra Kitreerawutiwong was a visiting researcher at Swansea University.Open access at:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174055 COLLEGE NANME Nursing COLLEGE CODE HNU Swansea University Naresuan University 2020-10-15T14:22:28.4299492 2017-03-14T06:32:19.5683485 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Health and Social Care - Public Health Nithra Kitreerawutiwong 1 Sue Jordan 0000-0002-5691-2987 2 David Hughes 3 0032382-27032017075119.pdf FacilitytypeandPCperformace.pdf 2017-03-27T07:51:19.5600000 Output 760066 application/pdf Version of Record true 2017-03-24T00:00:00.0000000 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. true eng
title Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand
spellingShingle Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand
Sue Jordan
David Hughes
title_short Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand
title_full Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand
title_fullStr Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand
title_sort Facility type and primary care performance in sub-district health promotion hospitals in Northern Thailand
author_id_str_mv 24ce9db29b4bde1af4e83b388aae0ea1
f1fbd458e3c75d8b597c0ac8036f2b88
author_id_fullname_str_mv 24ce9db29b4bde1af4e83b388aae0ea1_***_Sue Jordan
f1fbd458e3c75d8b597c0ac8036f2b88_***_David Hughes
author Sue Jordan
David Hughes
author2 Nithra Kitreerawutiwong
Sue Jordan
David Hughes
format Journal article
container_title PLOS ONE
container_volume 12
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0174055
publishDate 2017
institution Swansea University
issn 1932-6203
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0174055
publisher PLOS
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Health and Social Care - Public Health{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Health and Social Care - Public Health
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description This paper examines primary care performance in three types of community health facilities in five provinces in northern Thailand. Tambon (sub-district) health promotion hospitals (THPHs) were introduced in 2009 to upgrade the services offered by the previous health centres, but were hampered by shortages of trained doctors and nurses. The Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) designated three categories of THPH, defined according to whether they were regularly staffed by a medical practitioner, a qualified nurse or non-clinical public health officers. While the plan is to move over time to doctor-staffed THPHs, many rural areas rely on facilities staffed by public health officers or nurses. The study used structured interviews to measure patient views on performance, defined in terms of accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, co-ordination and community orientation, in 23 THPHs divided across the three types. Counter-intuitively it was the THPHs staffed by public health officers which achieved the highest scores, followed by nurse-staffed facilities and then doctor-staffed facilities. The sharpest differences found were in the scores for accessibility, continuity, and comprehensiveness of care. The authors argue that these are associated with local services, which rural patients in particular value more than services offered by doctors on rotation in larger outpatient department-like centres. Patients value these aspects of care more than professional skill-mix per se. This is not an argument for delaying an increase in use of qualified staff, but an indication of the need to do this in a way that preserves the features of local services that patients value.
published_date 2017-03-24T03:39:40Z
_version_ 1763751788299681792
score 11.013619

Similar Items