Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide

Gray, Claudia L.; L., Samantha L.; Newbold, Tim; Hudson, Lawrence N.; Borger, Luca; Contu, Sara; Hoskins, Andrew J.; Ferrier, Simon; Purvis, Andy; W., Jörn P.

doi:10.1038/ncomms12306

Journal article 1464 views 231 downloads

Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide

Claudia L. Gray, Samantha L. L. Hill, Tim Newbold, Lawrence N. Hudson, Luca Borger

, Sara Contu, Andrew J. Hoskins, Simon Ferrier, Andy Purvis, Jörn P. W. Scharlemann

Nature Communications, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Start page: 12306

Swansea University Author: Luca Borger

PDF | Version of Record

©The Author(s) 2016. All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Download (604.08KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1038/ncomms12306

Abstract

Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodive...

Full description

Published in:	Nature Communications
ISSN:	2041-1723
Published:	Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2016
Online Access:	Check full text
URI:	https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa29366
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

first_indexed	2016-08-01T03:54:11Z
last_indexed	2020-11-13T03:40:42Z
id	cronfa29366
recordtype	SURis
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-11-12T16:07:15.8742331</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>29366</id><entry>2016-07-31</entry><title>Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-8763-5997</ORCID><firstname>Luca</firstname><surname>Borger</surname><name>Luca Borger</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2016-07-31</date><deptcode>SBI</deptcode><abstract>Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodiversity measures at sites sampled in multiple land uses inside and outside protected areas. Globally, species richness is 10.6% higher and abundance 14.5% higher in samples taken inside protected areas compared with samples taken outside, but neither rarefaction-based richness nor endemicity differ significantly. Importantly, we show that the positive effects of protection are mostly attributable to differences in land use between protected and unprotected sites. Nonetheless, even within some human-dominated land uses, species richness and abundance are higher in protected sites. Our results reinforce the global importance of protected areas but suggest that protection does not consistently benefit species with small ranges or increase the variety of ecological niches.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Nature Communications</journal><volume>7</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>12306</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>Springer Science and Business Media LLC</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2041-1723</issnElectronic><keywords>biodiversity, protected areas, conservation, conservation biology</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>11</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2016</publishedYear><publishedDate>2016-11-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1038/ncomms12306</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Biosciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SBI</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-11-12T16:07:15.8742331</lastEdited><Created>2016-07-31T21:24:21.4429564</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Claudia L.</firstname><surname>Gray</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Samantha L. L.</firstname><surname>Hill</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Tim</firstname><surname>Newbold</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Lawrence N.</firstname><surname>Hudson</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Luca</firstname><surname>Borger</surname><orcid>0000-0001-8763-5997</orcid><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Sara</firstname><surname>Contu</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Andrew J.</firstname><surname>Hoskins</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Simon</firstname><surname>Ferrier</surname><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Andy</firstname><surname>Purvis</surname><order>9</order></author><author><firstname>Jörn P. W.</firstname><surname>Scharlemann</surname><order>10</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>0029366-31072016212642.pdf</filename><originalFilename>Gray_etal_2016_ProtectedAreasEffectiveness.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2016-07-31T21:26:42.5930000</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>632775</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>©The Author(s) 2016. All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling	2020-11-12T16:07:15.8742331 v2 29366 2016-07-31 Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide 8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2 0000-0001-8763-5997 Luca Borger Luca Borger true false 2016-07-31 SBI Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodiversity measures at sites sampled in multiple land uses inside and outside protected areas. Globally, species richness is 10.6% higher and abundance 14.5% higher in samples taken inside protected areas compared with samples taken outside, but neither rarefaction-based richness nor endemicity differ significantly. Importantly, we show that the positive effects of protection are mostly attributable to differences in land use between protected and unprotected sites. Nonetheless, even within some human-dominated land uses, species richness and abundance are higher in protected sites. Our results reinforce the global importance of protected areas but suggest that protection does not consistently benefit species with small ranges or increase the variety of ecological niches. Journal Article Nature Communications 7 1 12306 Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2041-1723 biodiversity, protected areas, conservation, conservation biology 1 11 2016 2016-11-01 10.1038/ncomms12306 COLLEGE NANME Biosciences COLLEGE CODE SBI Swansea University 2020-11-12T16:07:15.8742331 2016-07-31T21:24:21.4429564 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences Claudia L. Gray 1 Samantha L. L. Hill 2 Tim Newbold 3 Lawrence N. Hudson 4 Luca Borger 0000-0001-8763-5997 5 Sara Contu 6 Andrew J. Hoskins 7 Simon Ferrier 8 Andy Purvis 9 Jörn P. W. Scharlemann 10 0029366-31072016212642.pdf Gray_etal_2016_ProtectedAreasEffectiveness.pdf 2016-07-31T21:26:42.5930000 Output 632775 application/pdf Version of Record true ©The Author(s) 2016. All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title	Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
spellingShingle	Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide Luca Borger
title_short	Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_full	Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_fullStr	Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_full_unstemmed	Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_sort	Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
author_id_str_mv	8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2
author_id_fullname_str_mv	8416d0ffc3cccdad6e6d67a455e7c4a2_***_Luca Borger
author	Luca Borger
author2	Claudia L. Gray Samantha L. L. Hill Tim Newbold Lawrence N. Hudson Luca Borger Sara Contu Andrew J. Hoskins Simon Ferrier Andy Purvis Jörn P. W. Scharlemann
format	Journal article
container_title	Nature Communications
container_volume	7
container_issue	1
container_start_page	12306
publishDate	2016
institution	Swansea University
issn	2041-1723
doi_str_mv	10.1038/ncomms12306
publisher	Springer Science and Business Media LLC
college_str	Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id	facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title	Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id	facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title	Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str	School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Biosciences, Geography and Physics - Biosciences
document_store_str	1
active_str	0
description	Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodiversity measures at sites sampled in multiple land uses inside and outside protected areas. Globally, species richness is 10.6% higher and abundance 14.5% higher in samples taken inside protected areas compared with samples taken outside, but neither rarefaction-based richness nor endemicity differ significantly. Importantly, we show that the positive effects of protection are mostly attributable to differences in land use between protected and unprotected sites. Nonetheless, even within some human-dominated land uses, species richness and abundance are higher in protected sites. Our results reinforce the global importance of protected areas but suggest that protection does not consistently benefit species with small ranges or increase the variety of ecological niches.
published_date	2016-11-01T03:35:42Z
_version_	1763751537766563840
score	11.013731

Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide

Similar Items