No Cover Image

Journal article 22064 views

Prudence, Well-being and Sport

Andrew Bloodworth Orcid Logo

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, Volume: 8, Issue: 2, Pages: 191 - 202

Swansea University Author: Andrew Bloodworth Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1080/17511321.2014.935741

Abstract

Participation in sport, in particular intensive elite sport may be associated with shorter and longer term risks to health. Elite sport participation might also be associated with a narrow focus, to the detriment of developing in other ways, perhaps with regard to friendships or education. This pape...

Full description

Published in: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
ISSN: 1751-1321 1751-133X
Published: Informa UK Limited 2014
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa21357
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2015-05-15T02:02:52Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T13:52:28Z
id cronfa21357
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-11-02T13:28:59.1117502</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>21357</id><entry>2015-05-13</entry><title>Prudence, Well-being and Sport</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-4601-442X</ORCID><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Bloodworth</surname><name>Andrew Bloodworth</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2015-05-13</date><deptcode>STSC</deptcode><abstract>Participation in sport, in particular intensive elite sport may be associated with shorter and longer term risks to health. Elite sport participation might also be associated with a narrow focus, to the detriment of developing in other ways, perhaps with regard to friendships or education. This paper explores the issues surrounding prudence and sport. It begins by examining two central aspects of the rationale for prudential engagement with sport and physical activity. (1) The contention that each stage of life counts equally in assessing well-being over a life; and (2) The need to detach from present concerns and commitments to maintain a range of options from which to pursue well-being in the future. These aspects of a prudential athletic lifestyle, along with the contention that prudence can be defended in terms of rationality are explored and challenged. These challenges are not found to be persuasive in terms of abandoning altogether the notion that a prudent engagement with sports and physical activity is a rational one. Stronger objections to the current understanding of the recommendations of prudence are found upon examination of Griffin&#x2019;s theory of well-being. The fact that values on a list such as Griffin&#x2019;s might be realised in multiple ways casts doubt on the contention that certain choices now will necessarily risk future well-being. Second, Griffin&#x2019;s understanding of the relationship between health and well-being (health as a means to well-being) throws into doubt common interpretations of harms to health and their impact upon well-being. Accepting that there are multiple ways in which to fulfil those values constitutive of well-being, and that health is a purely instrumental good, offers a strong challenge to construing certain choices in the sports and exercise domain as imprudent and ultimately detrimental to well-being.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Sport, Ethics and Philosophy</journal><volume>8</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>191</paginationStart><paginationEnd>202</paginationEnd><publisher>Informa UK Limited</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>1751-1321</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1751-133X</issnElectronic><keywords>prudence; sport; well-being</keywords><publishedDay>3</publishedDay><publishedMonth>4</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2014</publishedYear><publishedDate>2014-04-03</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/17511321.2014.935741</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Sport and Exercise Sciences</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>STSC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-11-02T13:28:59.1117502</lastEdited><Created>2015-05-13T11:32:26.2616607</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Andrew</firstname><surname>Bloodworth</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4601-442X</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-11-02T13:28:59.1117502 v2 21357 2015-05-13 Prudence, Well-being and Sport 3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889 0000-0002-4601-442X Andrew Bloodworth Andrew Bloodworth true false 2015-05-13 STSC Participation in sport, in particular intensive elite sport may be associated with shorter and longer term risks to health. Elite sport participation might also be associated with a narrow focus, to the detriment of developing in other ways, perhaps with regard to friendships or education. This paper explores the issues surrounding prudence and sport. It begins by examining two central aspects of the rationale for prudential engagement with sport and physical activity. (1) The contention that each stage of life counts equally in assessing well-being over a life; and (2) The need to detach from present concerns and commitments to maintain a range of options from which to pursue well-being in the future. These aspects of a prudential athletic lifestyle, along with the contention that prudence can be defended in terms of rationality are explored and challenged. These challenges are not found to be persuasive in terms of abandoning altogether the notion that a prudent engagement with sports and physical activity is a rational one. Stronger objections to the current understanding of the recommendations of prudence are found upon examination of Griffin’s theory of well-being. The fact that values on a list such as Griffin’s might be realised in multiple ways casts doubt on the contention that certain choices now will necessarily risk future well-being. Second, Griffin’s understanding of the relationship between health and well-being (health as a means to well-being) throws into doubt common interpretations of harms to health and their impact upon well-being. Accepting that there are multiple ways in which to fulfil those values constitutive of well-being, and that health is a purely instrumental good, offers a strong challenge to construing certain choices in the sports and exercise domain as imprudent and ultimately detrimental to well-being. Journal Article Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 8 2 191 202 Informa UK Limited 1751-1321 1751-133X prudence; sport; well-being 3 4 2014 2014-04-03 10.1080/17511321.2014.935741 COLLEGE NANME Sport and Exercise Sciences COLLEGE CODE STSC Swansea University 2022-11-02T13:28:59.1117502 2015-05-13T11:32:26.2616607 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences Andrew Bloodworth 0000-0002-4601-442X 1
title Prudence, Well-being and Sport
spellingShingle Prudence, Well-being and Sport
Andrew Bloodworth
title_short Prudence, Well-being and Sport
title_full Prudence, Well-being and Sport
title_fullStr Prudence, Well-being and Sport
title_full_unstemmed Prudence, Well-being and Sport
title_sort Prudence, Well-being and Sport
author_id_str_mv 3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889
author_id_fullname_str_mv 3d3183652dd8a45724e24c671b295889_***_Andrew Bloodworth
author Andrew Bloodworth
author2 Andrew Bloodworth
format Journal article
container_title Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
container_volume 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 191
publishDate 2014
institution Swansea University
issn 1751-1321
1751-133X
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17511321.2014.935741
publisher Informa UK Limited
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Aerospace, Civil, Electrical, General and Mechanical Engineering - Sport and Exercise Sciences
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Participation in sport, in particular intensive elite sport may be associated with shorter and longer term risks to health. Elite sport participation might also be associated with a narrow focus, to the detriment of developing in other ways, perhaps with regard to friendships or education. This paper explores the issues surrounding prudence and sport. It begins by examining two central aspects of the rationale for prudential engagement with sport and physical activity. (1) The contention that each stage of life counts equally in assessing well-being over a life; and (2) The need to detach from present concerns and commitments to maintain a range of options from which to pursue well-being in the future. These aspects of a prudential athletic lifestyle, along with the contention that prudence can be defended in terms of rationality are explored and challenged. These challenges are not found to be persuasive in terms of abandoning altogether the notion that a prudent engagement with sports and physical activity is a rational one. Stronger objections to the current understanding of the recommendations of prudence are found upon examination of Griffin’s theory of well-being. The fact that values on a list such as Griffin’s might be realised in multiple ways casts doubt on the contention that certain choices now will necessarily risk future well-being. Second, Griffin’s understanding of the relationship between health and well-being (health as a means to well-being) throws into doubt common interpretations of harms to health and their impact upon well-being. Accepting that there are multiple ways in which to fulfil those values constitutive of well-being, and that health is a purely instrumental good, offers a strong challenge to construing certain choices in the sports and exercise domain as imprudent and ultimately detrimental to well-being.
published_date 2014-04-03T03:25:19Z
_version_ 1763750884705042432
score 11.013731

Similar Items