No Cover Image

Journal article 1221 views

Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition

Edwin J. Burns, Jeremy Tree Orcid Logo, Christoph Weidemann

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Volume: 8

Swansea University Authors: Jeremy Tree Orcid Logo, Christoph Weidemann

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00622

Abstract

Dual process models of recognition memory propose two distinct routes for recognizing a face: recollection and familiarity. Recollection is characterized by the remembering of some contextual detail from a previous encounter with a face whereas familiarity is the feeling of finding a face familiar w...

Full description

Published in: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published: 2014
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa18270
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2014-08-25T01:58:23Z
last_indexed 2020-12-09T03:28:19Z
id cronfa18270
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2020-12-08T13:34:50.8185738</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>18270</id><entry>2014-08-24</entry><title>Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6000-8125</ORCID><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><name>Jeremy Tree</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>b155eeefe08155214e70fea25649223c</sid><firstname>Christoph</firstname><surname>Weidemann</surname><name>Christoph Weidemann</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2014-08-24</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Dual process models of recognition memory propose two distinct routes for recognizing a face: recollection and familiarity. Recollection is characterized by the remembering of some contextual detail from a previous encounter with a face whereas familiarity is the feeling of finding a face familiar without any contextual details. The Remember/Know (R/K) paradigm is thought to index the relative contributions of recollection and familiarity to recognition performance. Despite researchers measuring face recognition deficits in developmental prosopagnosia (DP) through a variety of methods, none have considered the distinct contributions of recollection and familiarity to recognition performance. The present study examined recognition memory for faces in eight individuals with DP and a group of controls using an R/K paradigm while recording electroencephalogram (EEG) data at the scalp. Those with DP were found to produce fewer correct &#x201C;remember&#x201D; responses and more false alarms than controls. EEG results showed that posterior &#x201C;remember&#x201D; old/new effects were delayed and restricted to the right posterior (RP) area in those with DP in comparison to the controls. A posterior &#x201C;know&#x201D; old/new effect commonly associated with familiarity for faces was only present in the controls whereas individuals with DP exhibited a frontal &#x201C;know&#x201D; old/new effect commonly associated with words, objects and pictures. These results suggest that individuals with DP do not utilize normal face-specific routes when making face recognition judgments but instead process faces using a pathway more commonly associated with objects.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience</journal><volume>8</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>14</publishedDay><publishedMonth>8</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2014</publishedYear><publishedDate>2014-08-14</publishedDate><doi>10.3389/fnhum.2014.00622</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2020-12-08T13:34:50.8185738</lastEdited><Created>2014-08-24T12:50:50.5129203</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Edwin J.</firstname><surname>Burns</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6000-8125</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Christoph</firstname><surname>Weidemann</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2020-12-08T13:34:50.8185738 v2 18270 2014-08-24 Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad 0000-0001-6000-8125 Jeremy Tree Jeremy Tree true false b155eeefe08155214e70fea25649223c Christoph Weidemann Christoph Weidemann true false 2014-08-24 HPS Dual process models of recognition memory propose two distinct routes for recognizing a face: recollection and familiarity. Recollection is characterized by the remembering of some contextual detail from a previous encounter with a face whereas familiarity is the feeling of finding a face familiar without any contextual details. The Remember/Know (R/K) paradigm is thought to index the relative contributions of recollection and familiarity to recognition performance. Despite researchers measuring face recognition deficits in developmental prosopagnosia (DP) through a variety of methods, none have considered the distinct contributions of recollection and familiarity to recognition performance. The present study examined recognition memory for faces in eight individuals with DP and a group of controls using an R/K paradigm while recording electroencephalogram (EEG) data at the scalp. Those with DP were found to produce fewer correct “remember” responses and more false alarms than controls. EEG results showed that posterior “remember” old/new effects were delayed and restricted to the right posterior (RP) area in those with DP in comparison to the controls. A posterior “know” old/new effect commonly associated with familiarity for faces was only present in the controls whereas individuals with DP exhibited a frontal “know” old/new effect commonly associated with words, objects and pictures. These results suggest that individuals with DP do not utilize normal face-specific routes when making face recognition judgments but instead process faces using a pathway more commonly associated with objects. Journal Article Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 14 8 2014 2014-08-14 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00622 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University 2020-12-08T13:34:50.8185738 2014-08-24T12:50:50.5129203 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Edwin J. Burns 1 Jeremy Tree 0000-0001-6000-8125 2 Christoph Weidemann 3
title Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition
spellingShingle Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition
Jeremy Tree
Christoph Weidemann
title_short Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition
title_full Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition
title_fullStr Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition
title_full_unstemmed Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition
title_sort Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition
author_id_str_mv 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad
b155eeefe08155214e70fea25649223c
author_id_fullname_str_mv 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad_***_Jeremy Tree
b155eeefe08155214e70fea25649223c_***_Christoph Weidemann
author Jeremy Tree
Christoph Weidemann
author2 Edwin J. Burns
Jeremy Tree
Christoph Weidemann
format Journal article
container_title Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
container_volume 8
publishDate 2014
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00622
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Dual process models of recognition memory propose two distinct routes for recognizing a face: recollection and familiarity. Recollection is characterized by the remembering of some contextual detail from a previous encounter with a face whereas familiarity is the feeling of finding a face familiar without any contextual details. The Remember/Know (R/K) paradigm is thought to index the relative contributions of recollection and familiarity to recognition performance. Despite researchers measuring face recognition deficits in developmental prosopagnosia (DP) through a variety of methods, none have considered the distinct contributions of recollection and familiarity to recognition performance. The present study examined recognition memory for faces in eight individuals with DP and a group of controls using an R/K paradigm while recording electroencephalogram (EEG) data at the scalp. Those with DP were found to produce fewer correct “remember” responses and more false alarms than controls. EEG results showed that posterior “remember” old/new effects were delayed and restricted to the right posterior (RP) area in those with DP in comparison to the controls. A posterior “know” old/new effect commonly associated with familiarity for faces was only present in the controls whereas individuals with DP exhibited a frontal “know” old/new effect commonly associated with words, objects and pictures. These results suggest that individuals with DP do not utilize normal face-specific routes when making face recognition judgments but instead process faces using a pathway more commonly associated with objects.
published_date 2014-08-14T03:21:23Z
_version_ 1763750637256835072
score 11.013148

Similar Items