No Cover Image

Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 1217 views

Reusable components of semantic specifications

Martin Churchill, Peter Mosses Orcid Logo, Paolo Torrini

Modularity '14, Pages: 145 - 156

Swansea University Author: Peter Mosses Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.1145/2577080.2577099

Abstract

Semantic specifications of programming languages typically have poor modularity. This hinders reuse of parts of the semantics of one language when specifying a different language -- even when the two languages have many constructs in common -- and evolution of a language may require major reformulat...

Full description

Published in: Modularity '14
Published: New York ACM 2014
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa17943
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2014-05-12T14:04:26Z
last_indexed 2019-02-11T19:07:09Z
id cronfa17943
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-02-11T15:50:45.4859923</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>17943</id><entry>2014-05-12</entry><title>Reusable components of semantic specifications</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>3f13b8ec315845c81d371f41e772399c</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5826-7520</ORCID><firstname>Peter</firstname><surname>Mosses</surname><name>Peter Mosses</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2014-05-12</date><deptcode>FGSEN</deptcode><abstract>Semantic specifications of programming languages typically have poor modularity. This hinders reuse of parts of the semantics of one language when specifying a different language -- even when the two languages have many constructs in common -- and evolution of a language may require major reformulation of its semantics. Such drawbacks have discouraged language developers from using formal semantics to document their designs.In the PlanCompS project, we have developed a component-based approach to semantics. Here, we explain its modularity aspects, and present an illustrative case study. Our approach provides good modularity, facilitates reuse, and supports co-evolution of languages and their formal semantics. It could be particularly useful in connection with domain-specific languages and language-driven software development.</abstract><type>Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract</type><journal>Modularity '14</journal><paginationStart>145</paginationStart><paginationEnd>156</paginationEnd><publisher>ACM</publisher><placeOfPublication>New York</placeOfPublication><keywords>co-evolution, component-based semantics, funcons, fundamental constructs, modular sos, modularity, reusability, semantics of programming languages</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>4</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2014</publishedYear><publishedDate>2014-04-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1145/2577080.2577099</doi><url/><notes></notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Science and Engineering - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGSEN</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-02-11T15:50:45.4859923</lastEdited><Created>2014-05-12T10:48:26.0504281</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Martin</firstname><surname>Churchill</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Peter</firstname><surname>Mosses</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5826-7520</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Paolo</firstname><surname>Torrini</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2019-02-11T15:50:45.4859923 v2 17943 2014-05-12 Reusable components of semantic specifications 3f13b8ec315845c81d371f41e772399c 0000-0002-5826-7520 Peter Mosses Peter Mosses true false 2014-05-12 FGSEN Semantic specifications of programming languages typically have poor modularity. This hinders reuse of parts of the semantics of one language when specifying a different language -- even when the two languages have many constructs in common -- and evolution of a language may require major reformulation of its semantics. Such drawbacks have discouraged language developers from using formal semantics to document their designs.In the PlanCompS project, we have developed a component-based approach to semantics. Here, we explain its modularity aspects, and present an illustrative case study. Our approach provides good modularity, facilitates reuse, and supports co-evolution of languages and their formal semantics. It could be particularly useful in connection with domain-specific languages and language-driven software development. Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract Modularity '14 145 156 ACM New York co-evolution, component-based semantics, funcons, fundamental constructs, modular sos, modularity, reusability, semantics of programming languages 30 4 2014 2014-04-30 10.1145/2577080.2577099 COLLEGE NANME Science and Engineering - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGSEN Swansea University 2019-02-11T15:50:45.4859923 2014-05-12T10:48:26.0504281 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science Martin Churchill 1 Peter Mosses 0000-0002-5826-7520 2 Paolo Torrini 3
title Reusable components of semantic specifications
spellingShingle Reusable components of semantic specifications
Peter Mosses
title_short Reusable components of semantic specifications
title_full Reusable components of semantic specifications
title_fullStr Reusable components of semantic specifications
title_full_unstemmed Reusable components of semantic specifications
title_sort Reusable components of semantic specifications
author_id_str_mv 3f13b8ec315845c81d371f41e772399c
author_id_fullname_str_mv 3f13b8ec315845c81d371f41e772399c_***_Peter Mosses
author Peter Mosses
author2 Martin Churchill
Peter Mosses
Paolo Torrini
format Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract
container_title Modularity '14
container_start_page 145
publishDate 2014
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.1145/2577080.2577099
publisher ACM
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Mathematics and Computer Science - Computer Science
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Semantic specifications of programming languages typically have poor modularity. This hinders reuse of parts of the semantics of one language when specifying a different language -- even when the two languages have many constructs in common -- and evolution of a language may require major reformulation of its semantics. Such drawbacks have discouraged language developers from using formal semantics to document their designs.In the PlanCompS project, we have developed a component-based approach to semantics. Here, we explain its modularity aspects, and present an illustrative case study. Our approach provides good modularity, facilitates reuse, and supports co-evolution of languages and their formal semantics. It could be particularly useful in connection with domain-specific languages and language-driven software development.
published_date 2014-04-30T03:20:53Z
_version_ 1763750606447575040
score 11.014067

Similar Items