No Cover Image

Journal article 1498 views

Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting

Timothy J Perfect, Louisa-Jayne Stark, Jeremy Tree Orcid Logo, Christopher J.A Moulin, Lubna Ahmed, Russell Hutter

Journal of Memory and Language, Volume: 51, Issue: 3, Pages: 399 - 417

Swansea University Author: Jeremy Tree Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.003

Abstract

Retrieval-induced forgetting is the failure to recall a previously studied word following repeated retrieval of a related item. It has been argued that this is due to retrieval competition between practiced and unpracticed items, which results in inhibition of the non-recalled item, detectable with...

Full description

Published in: Journal of Memory and Language
Published: 2004
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa16875
first_indexed 2014-01-30T17:01:16Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:49:57Z
id cronfa16875
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-01-10T16:44:11.8112889</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>16875</id><entry>2014-01-10</entry><title>Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-6000-8125</ORCID><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><name>Jeremy Tree</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2014-01-10</date><deptcode>PSYS</deptcode><abstract>Retrieval-induced forgetting is the failure to recall a previously studied word following repeated retrieval of a related item. It has been argued that this is due to retrieval competition between practiced and unpracticed items, which results in inhibition of the non-recalled item, detectable with an independent cue at final test. Three experiments were conducted in which two cues were associated with a target item at encoding. All three studies demonstrated retrieval-induced forgetting when the same retrieval cue was present at practice and test, but not when the second encoding cue was used as an independent probe at final test. These data are not compatible with a general inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting, but support a context-specific account of the phenomenon.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Journal of Memory and Language</journal><volume>51</volume><journalNumber>3</journalNumber><paginationStart>399</paginationStart><paginationEnd>417</paginationEnd><publisher/><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2004</publishedYear><publishedDate>2004-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.003</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>PSYS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-01-10T16:44:11.8112889</lastEdited><Created>2014-01-10T16:44:11.8112889</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Timothy J</firstname><surname>Perfect</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Louisa-Jayne</firstname><surname>Stark</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jeremy</firstname><surname>Tree</surname><orcid>0000-0001-6000-8125</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Christopher J.A</firstname><surname>Moulin</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Lubna</firstname><surname>Ahmed</surname><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Russell</firstname><surname>Hutter</surname><order>6</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2014-01-10T16:44:11.8112889 v2 16875 2014-01-10 Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad 0000-0001-6000-8125 Jeremy Tree Jeremy Tree true false 2014-01-10 PSYS Retrieval-induced forgetting is the failure to recall a previously studied word following repeated retrieval of a related item. It has been argued that this is due to retrieval competition between practiced and unpracticed items, which results in inhibition of the non-recalled item, detectable with an independent cue at final test. Three experiments were conducted in which two cues were associated with a target item at encoding. All three studies demonstrated retrieval-induced forgetting when the same retrieval cue was present at practice and test, but not when the second encoding cue was used as an independent probe at final test. These data are not compatible with a general inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting, but support a context-specific account of the phenomenon. Journal Article Journal of Memory and Language 51 3 399 417 31 12 2004 2004-12-31 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.003 COLLEGE NANME Psychology School COLLEGE CODE PSYS Swansea University 2014-01-10T16:44:11.8112889 2014-01-10T16:44:11.8112889 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology Timothy J Perfect 1 Louisa-Jayne Stark 2 Jeremy Tree 0000-0001-6000-8125 3 Christopher J.A Moulin 4 Lubna Ahmed 5 Russell Hutter 6
title Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting
spellingShingle Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting
Jeremy Tree
title_short Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting
title_full Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting
title_fullStr Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting
title_full_unstemmed Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting
title_sort Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting
author_id_str_mv 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad
author_id_fullname_str_mv 373fd575114a743d502a979c6161b1ad_***_Jeremy Tree
author Jeremy Tree
author2 Timothy J Perfect
Louisa-Jayne Stark
Jeremy Tree
Christopher J.A Moulin
Lubna Ahmed
Russell Hutter
format Journal article
container_title Journal of Memory and Language
container_volume 51
container_issue 3
container_start_page 399
publishDate 2004
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.003
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Retrieval-induced forgetting is the failure to recall a previously studied word following repeated retrieval of a related item. It has been argued that this is due to retrieval competition between practiced and unpracticed items, which results in inhibition of the non-recalled item, detectable with an independent cue at final test. Three experiments were conducted in which two cues were associated with a target item at encoding. All three studies demonstrated retrieval-induced forgetting when the same retrieval cue was present at practice and test, but not when the second encoding cue was used as an independent probe at final test. These data are not compatible with a general inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting, but support a context-specific account of the phenomenon.
published_date 2004-12-31T00:36:52Z
_version_ 1821363732543963136
score 11.04748

Similar Items