Journal article 4033 views
Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms.
Elizabeth Macdonald
Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, Volume: 2013, Issue: 19, Start page: NA
Swansea University Author: Elizabeth Macdonald
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
Abstract
It is a matter of controversy, whether the postal rule should be applied to e-mail and similarly modern methods of communication. This article looks at the underlying bases of the rule and recognises that it has always been a matter of the weighing of benefits and drawbacks. A balance favouring a di...
Published in: | Web Journal of Current Legal Issues |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1360-1326 |
Published: |
2013
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa15234 |
first_indexed |
2013-07-23T12:14:06Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-11-13T19:19:43Z |
id |
cronfa15234 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2018-11-13T13:18:59.0894628</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>15234</id><entry>2013-07-22</entry><title>Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms.</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>a63a909e63c139a6816c06d3d6776339</sid><firstname>Elizabeth</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><name>Elizabeth Macdonald</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2013-07-22</date><abstract>It is a matter of controversy, whether the postal rule should be applied to e-mail and similarly modern methods of communication. This article looks at the underlying bases of the rule and recognises that it has always been a matter of the weighing of benefits and drawbacks. A balance favouring a dispatch rule is very unlikely to exist with such newer methods of communication, and may well no longer even justify the postal rule in relation to the post itself. However, it is argued that the advantages of the rule should not simply be abandoned. It is contended that we should break away from the simple dichotomy of a dispatch or receipt rule, to seek a means of maintaining its positive impact, whilst avoiding the harmful side effects. It is further contended that could be achieved by use of the device of terms / contracts implied in law, which would also reveal the true nature of the rule, as concerned with the regulation of pre-contractual behaviour.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Web Journal of Current Legal Issues</journal><volume>2013</volume><journalNumber>19</journalNumber><paginationStart>NA</paginationStart><publisher/><issnPrint>1360-1326</issnPrint><keywords/><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>7</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2013</publishedYear><publishedDate>2013-07-31</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2018-11-13T13:18:59.0894628</lastEdited><Created>2013-07-22T12:42:39.4322273</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Elizabeth</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2018-11-13T13:18:59.0894628 v2 15234 2013-07-22 Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms. a63a909e63c139a6816c06d3d6776339 Elizabeth Macdonald Elizabeth Macdonald true false 2013-07-22 It is a matter of controversy, whether the postal rule should be applied to e-mail and similarly modern methods of communication. This article looks at the underlying bases of the rule and recognises that it has always been a matter of the weighing of benefits and drawbacks. A balance favouring a dispatch rule is very unlikely to exist with such newer methods of communication, and may well no longer even justify the postal rule in relation to the post itself. However, it is argued that the advantages of the rule should not simply be abandoned. It is contended that we should break away from the simple dichotomy of a dispatch or receipt rule, to seek a means of maintaining its positive impact, whilst avoiding the harmful side effects. It is further contended that could be achieved by use of the device of terms / contracts implied in law, which would also reveal the true nature of the rule, as concerned with the regulation of pre-contractual behaviour. Journal Article Web Journal of Current Legal Issues 2013 19 NA 1360-1326 31 7 2013 2013-07-31 COLLEGE NANME COLLEGE CODE Swansea University 2018-11-13T13:18:59.0894628 2013-07-22T12:42:39.4322273 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Elizabeth Macdonald 1 |
title |
Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms. |
spellingShingle |
Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms. Elizabeth Macdonald |
title_short |
Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms. |
title_full |
Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms. |
title_fullStr |
Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms. |
title_sort |
Dispatching the dispatch rule? The postal rule, e-mail, revocation and implied terms. |
author_id_str_mv |
a63a909e63c139a6816c06d3d6776339 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
a63a909e63c139a6816c06d3d6776339_***_Elizabeth Macdonald |
author |
Elizabeth Macdonald |
author2 |
Elizabeth Macdonald |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Web Journal of Current Legal Issues |
container_volume |
2013 |
container_issue |
19 |
container_start_page |
NA |
publishDate |
2013 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
1360-1326 |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
It is a matter of controversy, whether the postal rule should be applied to e-mail and similarly modern methods of communication. This article looks at the underlying bases of the rule and recognises that it has always been a matter of the weighing of benefits and drawbacks. A balance favouring a dispatch rule is very unlikely to exist with such newer methods of communication, and may well no longer even justify the postal rule in relation to the post itself. However, it is argued that the advantages of the rule should not simply be abandoned. It is contended that we should break away from the simple dichotomy of a dispatch or receipt rule, to seek a means of maintaining its positive impact, whilst avoiding the harmful side effects. It is further contended that could be achieved by use of the device of terms / contracts implied in law, which would also reveal the true nature of the rule, as concerned with the regulation of pre-contractual behaviour. |
published_date |
2013-07-31T06:28:16Z |
_version_ |
1821385840295673856 |
score |
11.047523 |