Journal article 1488 views
Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume: 38, Issue: 2
Swansea University Author: Charles Musselwhite
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.003
Abstract
In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextua...
Published in: | Accident Analysis & Prevention |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-4575 |
Published: |
2006
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa14674 |
first_indexed |
2013-07-23T12:12:40Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2019-06-14T19:17:53Z |
id |
cronfa14674 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2019-06-14T11:46:22.5782521</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>14674</id><entry>2013-04-23</entry><title>Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-4831-2092</ORCID><firstname>Charles</firstname><surname>Musselwhite</surname><name>Charles Musselwhite</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2013-04-23</date><deptcode>HSOC</deptcode><abstract>In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextualise risk taking behaviour in relation to car driving through studying the motivations and attitudes towards risk. The results were tested on a representative sample (n = 1655) of the UK driving population and four groups were identified based on motivations; those that took risk unintentionally formed the largest group. Three smaller groups who took deliberate risks were also found, a reactive risk taking group who took risks when reacting to stress or being in a hurry, a calculated risk taking group who took risks when they felt it was safe to do so, such as late at night or on well-known roads, and a continuous risk taking group who frequently took risks for their own sake</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Accident Analysis & Prevention</journal><volume>38</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationEnd>334</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0001-4575</issnPrint><keywords>Risk; Driving; Attitudes; Motivation</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2006</publishedYear><publishedDate>2006-03-31</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.003</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Health and Social Care School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HSOC</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2019-06-14T11:46:22.5782521</lastEdited><Created>2013-04-23T15:43:23.7572495</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">The Centre for Innovative Ageing</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Charles</firstname><surname>Musselwhite</surname><orcid>0000-0002-4831-2092</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2019-06-14T11:46:22.5782521 v2 14674 2013-04-23 Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c 0000-0002-4831-2092 Charles Musselwhite Charles Musselwhite true false 2013-04-23 HSOC In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextualise risk taking behaviour in relation to car driving through studying the motivations and attitudes towards risk. The results were tested on a representative sample (n = 1655) of the UK driving population and four groups were identified based on motivations; those that took risk unintentionally formed the largest group. Three smaller groups who took deliberate risks were also found, a reactive risk taking group who took risks when reacting to stress or being in a hurry, a calculated risk taking group who took risks when they felt it was safe to do so, such as late at night or on well-known roads, and a continuous risk taking group who frequently took risks for their own sake Journal Article Accident Analysis & Prevention 38 2 334 0001-4575 Risk; Driving; Attitudes; Motivation 31 3 2006 2006-03-31 10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.003 COLLEGE NANME Health and Social Care School COLLEGE CODE HSOC Swansea University 2019-06-14T11:46:22.5782521 2013-04-23T15:43:23.7572495 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences The Centre for Innovative Ageing Charles Musselwhite 0000-0002-4831-2092 1 |
title |
Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk |
spellingShingle |
Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk Charles Musselwhite |
title_short |
Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk |
title_full |
Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk |
title_fullStr |
Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk |
title_full_unstemmed |
Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk |
title_sort |
Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk |
author_id_str_mv |
c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
c9a49f25a5adb54c55612ae49560100c_***_Charles Musselwhite |
author |
Charles Musselwhite |
author2 |
Charles Musselwhite |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Accident Analysis & Prevention |
container_volume |
38 |
container_issue |
2 |
publishDate |
2006 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
0001-4575 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.003 |
college_str |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
department_str |
The Centre for Innovative Ageing{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}The Centre for Innovative Ageing |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextualise risk taking behaviour in relation to car driving through studying the motivations and attitudes towards risk. The results were tested on a representative sample (n = 1655) of the UK driving population and four groups were identified based on motivations; those that took risk unintentionally formed the largest group. Three smaller groups who took deliberate risks were also found, a reactive risk taking group who took risks when reacting to stress or being in a hurry, a calculated risk taking group who took risks when they felt it was safe to do so, such as late at night or on well-known roads, and a continuous risk taking group who frequently took risks for their own sake |
published_date |
2006-03-31T06:27:20Z |
_version_ |
1821385782210854912 |
score |
11.054791 |