Journal article 1673 views
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO
Criminal Law Review, Volume: 2006, Issue: 9, Pages: 791 - 808
Swansea University Author: Stuart Macdonald
Abstract
One of the primary objectives of the ASBO was to provide a mechanism for the imposition of "composite sentences" on those who persistently commit serious anti-social behaviour which repeatedly affects the same victims. It is this that was used to justify the severe maximum sentence for bre...
Published in: | Criminal Law Review |
---|---|
Published: |
2006
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa12300 |
first_indexed |
2013-07-23T12:07:47Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2018-02-09T04:42:21Z |
id |
cronfa12300 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-04-28T09:37:59.0583621</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>12300</id><entry>2012-07-30</entry><title>The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7483-9023</ORCID><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><name>Stuart Macdonald</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-07-30</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract>One of the primary objectives of the ASBO was to provide a mechanism for the imposition of "composite sentences" on those who persistently commit serious anti-social behaviour which repeatedly affects the same victims. It is this that was used to justify the severe maximum sentence for breach of an ASBO. Yet the courts have denied the relevance of the principle of composite sentencing. This has resulted in confusion, not only over the penalties which should be applied to individuals found to have breached their ASBO, but also over the role of the order itself. This article accordingly argues that composite sentencing should be recognised as an integral feature of the ASBO’s design, and outlines three implications which would follow for the ASBO.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Criminal Law Review</journal><volume>2006</volume><journalNumber>9</journalNumber><paginationStart>791</paginationStart><paginationEnd>808</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>ASBOs</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2006</publishedYear><publishedDate>2006-09-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-04-28T09:37:59.0583621</lastEdited><Created>2012-07-30T14:33:24.2910484</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7483-9023</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2014-04-28T09:37:59.0583621 v2 12300 2012-07-30 The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98 0000-0002-7483-9023 Stuart Macdonald Stuart Macdonald true false 2012-07-30 HRCL One of the primary objectives of the ASBO was to provide a mechanism for the imposition of "composite sentences" on those who persistently commit serious anti-social behaviour which repeatedly affects the same victims. It is this that was used to justify the severe maximum sentence for breach of an ASBO. Yet the courts have denied the relevance of the principle of composite sentencing. This has resulted in confusion, not only over the penalties which should be applied to individuals found to have breached their ASBO, but also over the role of the order itself. This article accordingly argues that composite sentencing should be recognised as an integral feature of the ASBO’s design, and outlines three implications which would follow for the ASBO. Journal Article Criminal Law Review 2006 9 791 808 ASBOs 1 9 2006 2006-09-01 COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University 2014-04-28T09:37:59.0583621 2012-07-30T14:33:24.2910484 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Stuart Macdonald 0000-0002-7483-9023 1 |
title |
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO |
spellingShingle |
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO Stuart Macdonald |
title_short |
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO |
title_full |
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO |
title_fullStr |
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO |
title_sort |
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications For, the ASBO |
author_id_str_mv |
933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98 |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98_***_Stuart Macdonald |
author |
Stuart Macdonald |
author2 |
Stuart Macdonald |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
Criminal Law Review |
container_volume |
2006 |
container_issue |
9 |
container_start_page |
791 |
publishDate |
2006 |
institution |
Swansea University |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
One of the primary objectives of the ASBO was to provide a mechanism for the imposition of "composite sentences" on those who persistently commit serious anti-social behaviour which repeatedly affects the same victims. It is this that was used to justify the severe maximum sentence for breach of an ASBO. Yet the courts have denied the relevance of the principle of composite sentencing. This has resulted in confusion, not only over the penalties which should be applied to individuals found to have breached their ASBO, but also over the role of the order itself. This article accordingly argues that composite sentencing should be recognised as an integral feature of the ASBO’s design, and outlines three implications which would follow for the ASBO. |
published_date |
2006-09-01T18:22:54Z |
_version_ |
1821340204048318464 |
score |
11.04748 |