No Cover Image

Journal article 1485 views

Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles

Stuart Macdonald Orcid Logo

Sydney Law Review, Volume: 34, Issue: 2, Pages: 317 - 346

Swansea University Author: Stuart Macdonald Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

Abstract

Although there has been a flurry of new anti-terrorism laws in the years since 9/11, which have had often far-reaching and significant effects, the framework which is most commonly used to explicate and evaluate these laws is widely regarded as unsatisfactory. The aim of this article is to develop a...

Full description

Published in: Sydney Law Review
ISSN: 0082-0512
Published: 2012
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa12293
first_indexed 2013-07-23T12:07:46Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:42:20Z
id cronfa12293
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2013-12-17T10:06:04.6073970</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>12293</id><entry>2012-07-30</entry><title>Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-7483-9023</ORCID><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><name>Stuart Macdonald</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-07-30</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract>Although there has been a flurry of new anti-terrorism laws in the years since 9/11, which have had often far-reaching and significant effects, the framework which is most commonly used to explicate and evaluate these laws is widely regarded as unsatisfactory. The aim of this article is to develop an alternative framework. The article uses a number of practical examples to illustrate how the proposed framework&#x2019;s key features open up discussion of issues of critical importance. In the absence of an entrenched Bill of Rights in Australia, the article also uses the framework to outline some strategies and techniques which can be utilised by those concerned to protect individuals from state overreaching.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Sydney Law Review</journal><volume>34</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>317</paginationStart><paginationEnd>346</paginationEnd><publisher/><issnPrint>0082-0512</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Anti-terrorism policy, values, principles</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2012</publishedYear><publishedDate>2012-06-01</publishedDate><doi/><url>http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_34/slr34_2/SLRv34no2Macdonald.pdf</url><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2013-12-17T10:06:04.6073970</lastEdited><Created>2012-07-30T13:54:19.4939804</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Stuart</firstname><surname>Macdonald</surname><orcid>0000-0002-7483-9023</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2013-12-17T10:06:04.6073970 v2 12293 2012-07-30 Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98 0000-0002-7483-9023 Stuart Macdonald Stuart Macdonald true false 2012-07-30 HRCL Although there has been a flurry of new anti-terrorism laws in the years since 9/11, which have had often far-reaching and significant effects, the framework which is most commonly used to explicate and evaluate these laws is widely regarded as unsatisfactory. The aim of this article is to develop an alternative framework. The article uses a number of practical examples to illustrate how the proposed framework’s key features open up discussion of issues of critical importance. In the absence of an entrenched Bill of Rights in Australia, the article also uses the framework to outline some strategies and techniques which can be utilised by those concerned to protect individuals from state overreaching. Journal Article Sydney Law Review 34 2 317 346 0082-0512 Anti-terrorism policy, values, principles 1 6 2012 2012-06-01 http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_34/slr34_2/SLRv34no2Macdonald.pdf COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University 2013-12-17T10:06:04.6073970 2012-07-30T13:54:19.4939804 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Stuart Macdonald 0000-0002-7483-9023 1
title Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles
spellingShingle Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles
Stuart Macdonald
title_short Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles
title_full Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles
title_fullStr Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles
title_sort Understanding Anti-Terrorism Policy: Values, Rationales and Principles
author_id_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98
author_id_fullname_str_mv 933e714a4cc37c3ac12d4edc277f8f98_***_Stuart Macdonald
author Stuart Macdonald
author2 Stuart Macdonald
format Journal article
container_title Sydney Law Review
container_volume 34
container_issue 2
container_start_page 317
publishDate 2012
institution Swansea University
issn 0082-0512
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law
url http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_34/slr34_2/SLRv34no2Macdonald.pdf
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Although there has been a flurry of new anti-terrorism laws in the years since 9/11, which have had often far-reaching and significant effects, the framework which is most commonly used to explicate and evaluate these laws is widely regarded as unsatisfactory. The aim of this article is to develop an alternative framework. The article uses a number of practical examples to illustrate how the proposed framework’s key features open up discussion of issues of critical importance. In the absence of an entrenched Bill of Rights in Australia, the article also uses the framework to outline some strategies and techniques which can be utilised by those concerned to protect individuals from state overreaching.
published_date 2012-06-01T00:26:43Z
_version_ 1821363093606760448
score 11.04748

Similar Items