Journal article 1642 views
Europe: what kind of idea?
Robert Bideleux
The European Legacy, Volume: 14, Issue: 2, Pages: 163 - 176
Swansea University Author: Robert Bideleux
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.1080/10848770902761025
Abstract
Salman Rushdie once asked “What kind of idea are you?” This article transposes his provocative question to “Europe”. It proposes that “Europe” cannot be primarily identified or located in terms of geographies, histories, religions, cultures or values, and that the countless attempts to do so merely...
| Published in: | The European Legacy |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1080-8770 1470-1316 |
| Published: |
Abingdon
The European Legacy
2009
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa11323 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| first_indexed |
2013-07-23T12:05:23Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2018-02-09T04:40:51Z |
| id |
cronfa11323 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2013-09-27T12:20:22.3712557</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>11323</id><entry>2012-06-14</entry><title>Europe: what kind of idea?</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>c3b880aac6e4c2a1536185702a45d443</sid><firstname>Robert</firstname><surname>Bideleux</surname><name>Robert Bideleux</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-06-14</date><deptcode>FGHSS</deptcode><abstract>Salman Rushdie once asked “What kind of idea are you?” This article transposes his provocative question to “Europe”. It proposes that “Europe” cannot be primarily identified or located in terms of geographies, histories, religions, cultures or values, and that the countless attempts to do so merely diminish the various competing ideas of “Europe”. The article also challenges more recently fashionable visions of “Europe” as a series of concentric circles centred upon (or emanating from) Brussels, as these indefensibly privilege some parts of “Europe” by treating them as Europe’s “core”, while equally unacceptably marginalizing other vital (and in most cases equally “European”!) portions of “Europe” by classifying them as ‘peripheries’. We propose that, while the currently dominant European Union countries have been busily attempting (albeit in vain!) to define and foster various ways of conceptualizing and privileging a “European core”, the borders and so-called “borderlands” of such “Europes” (however they are defined, and wherever and whatever they might be) have been continually constructing, contesting, resisting or challenging the various contending notions of “Europe”. Moreover, the peripheries and perimeters are no less important – and often no less “European” – than the supposed “core”, which is in any case continually shifting, mutating, and regrouping. Indeed, the ever-shifting so-called “peripheries” and “perimeters” of “Europe” have often done more than the supposed “core” to give substance to whatever conceptions of “Europe” were being mobilized or were jockeying for primacy at any given moment. The article concludes by arguing that the various contending ideas of “Europe” can best be understood, not as fixed entities, nor even as teleological constructs, but either as creative improvisations on themes which turn out differently each time they are ‘performed’ (as in jazz), or as competing narratives, à la Roland Barthes. Ultimately, taking a leaf out of Barthes’s book, the article puts forward a “Europe” Theory of Classification, which operates at the levels of functions, actions and narration.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>The European Legacy</journal><volume>14</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>163</paginationStart><paginationEnd>176</paginationEnd><publisher>The European Legacy</publisher><placeOfPublication>Abingdon</placeOfPublication><issnPrint>1080-8770</issnPrint><issnElectronic>1470-1316</issnElectronic><keywords>European Union, conceptions of Europe, borders, peripheries, cores, imaginary places, Borges, creative impovisation, Barthes, narration.</keywords><publishedDay>30</publishedDay><publishedMonth>4</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2009</publishedYear><publishedDate>2009-04-30</publishedDate><doi>10.1080/10848770902761025</doi><url>http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10848770902761025</url><notes>co-authored</notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGHSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2013-09-27T12:20:22.3712557</lastEdited><Created>2012-06-14T15:38:35.2260237</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Robert</firstname><surname>Bideleux</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2013-09-27T12:20:22.3712557 v2 11323 2012-06-14 Europe: what kind of idea? c3b880aac6e4c2a1536185702a45d443 Robert Bideleux Robert Bideleux true false 2012-06-14 FGHSS Salman Rushdie once asked “What kind of idea are you?” This article transposes his provocative question to “Europe”. It proposes that “Europe” cannot be primarily identified or located in terms of geographies, histories, religions, cultures or values, and that the countless attempts to do so merely diminish the various competing ideas of “Europe”. The article also challenges more recently fashionable visions of “Europe” as a series of concentric circles centred upon (or emanating from) Brussels, as these indefensibly privilege some parts of “Europe” by treating them as Europe’s “core”, while equally unacceptably marginalizing other vital (and in most cases equally “European”!) portions of “Europe” by classifying them as ‘peripheries’. We propose that, while the currently dominant European Union countries have been busily attempting (albeit in vain!) to define and foster various ways of conceptualizing and privileging a “European core”, the borders and so-called “borderlands” of such “Europes” (however they are defined, and wherever and whatever they might be) have been continually constructing, contesting, resisting or challenging the various contending notions of “Europe”. Moreover, the peripheries and perimeters are no less important – and often no less “European” – than the supposed “core”, which is in any case continually shifting, mutating, and regrouping. Indeed, the ever-shifting so-called “peripheries” and “perimeters” of “Europe” have often done more than the supposed “core” to give substance to whatever conceptions of “Europe” were being mobilized or were jockeying for primacy at any given moment. The article concludes by arguing that the various contending ideas of “Europe” can best be understood, not as fixed entities, nor even as teleological constructs, but either as creative improvisations on themes which turn out differently each time they are ‘performed’ (as in jazz), or as competing narratives, à la Roland Barthes. Ultimately, taking a leaf out of Barthes’s book, the article puts forward a “Europe” Theory of Classification, which operates at the levels of functions, actions and narration. Journal Article The European Legacy 14 2 163 176 The European Legacy Abingdon 1080-8770 1470-1316 European Union, conceptions of Europe, borders, peripheries, cores, imaginary places, Borges, creative impovisation, Barthes, narration. 30 4 2009 2009-04-30 10.1080/10848770902761025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10848770902761025 co-authored COLLEGE NANME Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGHSS Swansea University 2013-09-27T12:20:22.3712557 2012-06-14T15:38:35.2260237 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations Robert Bideleux 1 |
| title |
Europe: what kind of idea? |
| spellingShingle |
Europe: what kind of idea? Robert Bideleux |
| title_short |
Europe: what kind of idea? |
| title_full |
Europe: what kind of idea? |
| title_fullStr |
Europe: what kind of idea? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Europe: what kind of idea? |
| title_sort |
Europe: what kind of idea? |
| author_id_str_mv |
c3b880aac6e4c2a1536185702a45d443 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
c3b880aac6e4c2a1536185702a45d443_***_Robert Bideleux |
| author |
Robert Bideleux |
| author2 |
Robert Bideleux |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
The European Legacy |
| container_volume |
14 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
163 |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
1080-8770 1470-1316 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/10848770902761025 |
| publisher |
The European Legacy |
| college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| department_str |
School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - Politics, Philosophy and International Relations |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10848770902761025 |
| document_store_str |
0 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
Salman Rushdie once asked “What kind of idea are you?” This article transposes his provocative question to “Europe”. It proposes that “Europe” cannot be primarily identified or located in terms of geographies, histories, religions, cultures or values, and that the countless attempts to do so merely diminish the various competing ideas of “Europe”. The article also challenges more recently fashionable visions of “Europe” as a series of concentric circles centred upon (or emanating from) Brussels, as these indefensibly privilege some parts of “Europe” by treating them as Europe’s “core”, while equally unacceptably marginalizing other vital (and in most cases equally “European”!) portions of “Europe” by classifying them as ‘peripheries’. We propose that, while the currently dominant European Union countries have been busily attempting (albeit in vain!) to define and foster various ways of conceptualizing and privileging a “European core”, the borders and so-called “borderlands” of such “Europes” (however they are defined, and wherever and whatever they might be) have been continually constructing, contesting, resisting or challenging the various contending notions of “Europe”. Moreover, the peripheries and perimeters are no less important – and often no less “European” – than the supposed “core”, which is in any case continually shifting, mutating, and regrouping. Indeed, the ever-shifting so-called “peripheries” and “perimeters” of “Europe” have often done more than the supposed “core” to give substance to whatever conceptions of “Europe” were being mobilized or were jockeying for primacy at any given moment. The article concludes by arguing that the various contending ideas of “Europe” can best be understood, not as fixed entities, nor even as teleological constructs, but either as creative improvisations on themes which turn out differently each time they are ‘performed’ (as in jazz), or as competing narratives, à la Roland Barthes. Ultimately, taking a leaf out of Barthes’s book, the article puts forward a “Europe” Theory of Classification, which operates at the levels of functions, actions and narration. |
| published_date |
2009-04-30T03:13:01Z |
| _version_ |
1763750111501877248 |
| score |
11.0372095 |