No Cover Image

Journal article 1541 views

'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"'

Steven Vine

Interdisciplinary Literary Studies: A Journal of Criticism and Theory, Volume: 13, Issue: 1-2, Pages: 160 - 177

Swansea University Author: Steven Vine

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Abstract

Thomas Pynchon’s 'The Crying of Lot 49' (1965) is about the possible transformation of the social order by the disenfranchised, and is an allegory of the domination of ‘postmodern’ or consumer society by corporate capital. The article reads Pynchon’s text in terms of the debate between Jea...

Full description

Published in: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies: A Journal of Criticism and Theory
ISSN: 1524-8429
Published: Pennnsylvania Penn State University Press 2011
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa11194
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T12:05:15Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:40:41Z
id cronfa11194
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-05-15T16:36:24.4482036</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>11194</id><entry>2012-06-12</entry><title>'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon&#x2019;s "The Crying of Lot 49"'</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8adad05ceecbaab7f4b2be512149b4d7</sid><firstname>Steven</firstname><surname>Vine</surname><name>Steven Vine</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-06-12</date><deptcode>FGHSS</deptcode><abstract>Thomas Pynchon&#x2019;s 'The Crying of Lot 49' (1965) is about the possible transformation of the social order by the disenfranchised, and is an allegory of the domination of &#x2018;postmodern&#x2019; or consumer society by corporate capital. The article reads Pynchon&#x2019;s text in terms of the debate between Jean-Fran&#xE7;ois Lyotard and Frederic Jameson over the politics of the postmodern sublime. For Jameson, the subversive energies of modernism &#x2013; in which the dominant social order represented by bourgeois culture is contested by the scandalous idioms of a dissident art &#x2013; have been extinguished and incorporated by a postmodernist culture that has turned dissent and scandal into one more style, and transformed parody into pastiche. Jameson uses the language of the Burkean sublime &#x2013; terror, astonishment, diminishment &#x2013; to characterise the grasp of postmodern social life by global or multinational capital, a grasp that incorporates dissent and difference into itself and neutralizes the possibility of resistance. While Jameson describes late or postmodern capital in terms of sublime disempowerment, Lyotard uses the sublime as a figure of social dissensus and heterogeneity - and the article employs their contrasting versions of the sublime to read the divided political meaning of the &#x2018;Tristero System&#x2019; in Pynchon&#x2019;s text (an underground postal network that spans the ideological difference between assimilation and subversion). It argues that &#x2018;Tristero&#x2019; can be read in terms of Lyotard&#x2019;s sublime of the &#x2018;event,&#x2019; and in terms of a postmodern temporality.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Interdisciplinary Literary Studies: A Journal of Criticism and Theory</journal><volume>13</volume><journalNumber>1-2</journalNumber><paginationStart>160</paginationStart><paginationEnd>177</paginationEnd><publisher>Penn State University Press</publisher><placeOfPublication>Pennnsylvania</placeOfPublication><issnPrint>1524-8429</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>Pynchon, entropy, the sublime, postmodernism</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>9</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2011</publishedYear><publishedDate>2011-09-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes></notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGHSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-05-15T16:36:24.4482036</lastEdited><Created>2012-06-12T11:11:49.1164205</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Steven</firstname><surname>Vine</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2014-05-15T16:36:24.4482036 v2 11194 2012-06-12 'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"' 8adad05ceecbaab7f4b2be512149b4d7 Steven Vine Steven Vine true false 2012-06-12 FGHSS Thomas Pynchon’s 'The Crying of Lot 49' (1965) is about the possible transformation of the social order by the disenfranchised, and is an allegory of the domination of ‘postmodern’ or consumer society by corporate capital. The article reads Pynchon’s text in terms of the debate between Jean-François Lyotard and Frederic Jameson over the politics of the postmodern sublime. For Jameson, the subversive energies of modernism – in which the dominant social order represented by bourgeois culture is contested by the scandalous idioms of a dissident art – have been extinguished and incorporated by a postmodernist culture that has turned dissent and scandal into one more style, and transformed parody into pastiche. Jameson uses the language of the Burkean sublime – terror, astonishment, diminishment – to characterise the grasp of postmodern social life by global or multinational capital, a grasp that incorporates dissent and difference into itself and neutralizes the possibility of resistance. While Jameson describes late or postmodern capital in terms of sublime disempowerment, Lyotard uses the sublime as a figure of social dissensus and heterogeneity - and the article employs their contrasting versions of the sublime to read the divided political meaning of the ‘Tristero System’ in Pynchon’s text (an underground postal network that spans the ideological difference between assimilation and subversion). It argues that ‘Tristero’ can be read in terms of Lyotard’s sublime of the ‘event,’ and in terms of a postmodern temporality. Journal Article Interdisciplinary Literary Studies: A Journal of Criticism and Theory 13 1-2 160 177 Penn State University Press Pennnsylvania 1524-8429 Pynchon, entropy, the sublime, postmodernism 1 9 2011 2011-09-01 COLLEGE NANME Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGHSS Swansea University 2014-05-15T16:36:24.4482036 2012-06-12T11:11:49.1164205 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics Steven Vine 1
title 'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"'
spellingShingle 'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"'
Steven Vine
title_short 'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"'
title_full 'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"'
title_fullStr 'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"'
title_full_unstemmed 'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"'
title_sort 'The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s "The Crying of Lot 49"'
author_id_str_mv 8adad05ceecbaab7f4b2be512149b4d7
author_id_fullname_str_mv 8adad05ceecbaab7f4b2be512149b4d7_***_Steven Vine
author Steven Vine
author2 Steven Vine
format Journal article
container_title Interdisciplinary Literary Studies: A Journal of Criticism and Theory
container_volume 13
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 160
publishDate 2011
institution Swansea University
issn 1524-8429
publisher Penn State University Press
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Culture and Communication - English Language, Tesol, Applied Linguistics
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Thomas Pynchon’s 'The Crying of Lot 49' (1965) is about the possible transformation of the social order by the disenfranchised, and is an allegory of the domination of ‘postmodern’ or consumer society by corporate capital. The article reads Pynchon’s text in terms of the debate between Jean-François Lyotard and Frederic Jameson over the politics of the postmodern sublime. For Jameson, the subversive energies of modernism – in which the dominant social order represented by bourgeois culture is contested by the scandalous idioms of a dissident art – have been extinguished and incorporated by a postmodernist culture that has turned dissent and scandal into one more style, and transformed parody into pastiche. Jameson uses the language of the Burkean sublime – terror, astonishment, diminishment – to characterise the grasp of postmodern social life by global or multinational capital, a grasp that incorporates dissent and difference into itself and neutralizes the possibility of resistance. While Jameson describes late or postmodern capital in terms of sublime disempowerment, Lyotard uses the sublime as a figure of social dissensus and heterogeneity - and the article employs their contrasting versions of the sublime to read the divided political meaning of the ‘Tristero System’ in Pynchon’s text (an underground postal network that spans the ideological difference between assimilation and subversion). It argues that ‘Tristero’ can be read in terms of Lyotard’s sublime of the ‘event,’ and in terms of a postmodern temporality.
published_date 2011-09-01T03:12:53Z
_version_ 1763750102466297856
score 11.013799