Reed, P. (1994). Less than expected variance in studies of serial position effects is not a sufficient reason for caution. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22(2), pp. 224-230. doi:10.3758/BF03199924
Chicago Style CitationReed, Phil. "Less Than Expected Variance in Studies of Serial Position Effects Is Not a Sufficient Reason for Caution." Animal Learning & Behavior 22, no. 2 (1994): 224-230.
MLA CitationReed, Phil. "Less Than Expected Variance in Studies of Serial Position Effects Is Not a Sufficient Reason for Caution." Animal Learning & Behavior 22.2 (1994): 224-230.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.